Christi A. Flores
Professor Natasha Bryant
Introduction to Management
May 2, 2015
The diverse approaches to management have been fine tuned. Changed and discarded above the years. In this paper we will take a glance at the contemporary approaches. We will scrutinize how they evaluate to each other in addition to if they can be employed in the 3 sorts of environments; competitive, internal, and macro environment.
The initial approach to management would be the theory of sociotechnical systems. Investigators considered that for a business to be prosperous it would require the technical and the social system to effort together in harmony. The social system comprises of the employees, their skills, knowledge, attitude and their perceptive of their job. While the technical system comprises of the items the employee requires for doing their job like devices, tools, or also techniques. Both systems would effort jointly to generate an effect that would be useful to the organization. [Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013).]
The second approach is the approach of quantitative management. This approach utilizes numeric or mathematical techniques to compute issues of organizations consequently the manager can construct an informed decision. A number of techniques utilized are the simulation forecasting, linear equations, and breakeven analysis. This technique is not utilized as to a large extent owing to the fact an organization would require to determine people that are extremely familiar in relation to quantitative mathematics.
The third approach is the approach of organizational behavior in which a supervisor analyzes and studies, the employee’s behavior, an interaction of employee in a group and as the organization as a whole. This will assist to be aware of the whole thing from an attitude of employee’s to teamwork to how an organization can adapt and change.
The concluding approach is the approach of systems theory. This approach proposes that an organization is a structure and a structure can be either closed or open however in this case open. An open system denotes that an organization efforts with its surroundings by outputs and inputs. The organization influences the environment too as the environment have an effect on the organization. [Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013).]
The three environments comprise the internal, competitive and the macro environment. The internal environments are the forces inside the organization for instance the employees, managers, and resources. The competitive environment is the component of the outside environment which comprises customers, suppliers, and rivals. The macro environment is merely similar to the name, huge. It is the broad environment that comprises governments which can be expressed as regulations and laws, technology demographics, economy, and social values. [Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013).]
All of the four approaches to management are pertinent in every environment. All approach has to be taken into deliberation in the adjacent elements. The competitive and internal environments are relevant with every approach since if the organization doesn’t effort and have composition from inside (internal) they will not be successful with their competitive environment. This would eventually cripple the organization to itself reinvent or the organization might stop to exist. Each approach needs to also taking into consideration the macro environment and its constituents so they can assemble the accurate information to construct informed decisions and let the organization be successful. [Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013).]
The 4 modern approaches to managements (sociotechnical systems theory, quantitative management, organizational behavior and systems theory) in conclusion, are diverse from each other but can all make an informed decision to develop their organization to be successful in every environment. An organization requires looking at the environment about them and making a decision what will the finest approach for them to employ. In view of the fact that the organization desires to be successful they will require to find the correct fit for them. All contemporary approaches are used in each of the three environments to build the most excellent outcome of the organization and carry on to improve with the varying elements of today’s society.[ Robbins, S., & Decenzo, D. (2001).]
References
Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013). Management. (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Robbins, S., & Decenzo, D. (2001). Fundamentals of Management. (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall
References: Bateman, T.S., & Snell, S.A. (2013). Management. (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Robbins, S., & Decenzo, D. (2001). Fundamentals of Management. (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Organizational Behavior studies and identifies the behaviors and interactions between and of their workers to improve the organizations processes.…
- 845 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Quantitative Management helps a manager make a decision by developing mathematical models of the problem. Computers facilitated the development of specific quantitative methods. It included techniques such as: statistical decision theory, linear programming, queuing theory, simulation, forecasting, inventory modeling, network modeling, and break even analysis. Despite having all these methods, many managers will use results that are consistent with their experience, institution, and judgment. Many managers have not been trained to use these techniques.…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Because most things in life are part of larger systems, some seemingly trivial events can have significant impact. For example, in 1961, mathematician and meteorologist Edward Lorenz took a shortcut in entering data in a weather prediction model. He innocently entered .506 instead of the full numeric value of.506127, and the result was a completely different weather prediction. In a 1963 paper, Lorenz commented that if the theory were correct, “one flap of a seagull’s wings could change the course of weather forever.” He later changed that metaphor to a butterfly, and now the phenomenon is widely labeled the “butterfly effect” – where seemingly little events can lead to more significant changes to the larger system. Though I’m a little cautious to source Wikipedia, here is the definition of the Butterfly Effect: “The butterfly effect refers to the idea that a butterfly’s wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado, or might delay, accelerate, or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in another location. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events. Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different. While the butterfly does not ‘cause’ the tornado in the sense of providing the energy for the tornado, it does ‘cause’ it in the sense that the flap of its wings is an essential part of the initial conditions resulting in a tornado, and without that flap, that particular tornado would not have existed.” So the whole concept of the Butterfly Effect (which is similar to the Domino Effect) relies on the notion that everything is part of a larger system – in which small changes in part of a system can result in larger changes to other…
- 2136 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Organizational approach assumes that employee effectiveness is based on understanding the intricate interplay of individual, group, and organizational processes (Evolution, 2012). Disciplines such as psychology and sociology are used to try and explain the behavior of employees on the job (Bateman S. , 2013).…
- 310 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Schermerhorn, J. R., & Bachrach, D. R. (2015). Management (13 ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.…
- 1056 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The third approach is the organizational behavior. According to Bateman and Snell, (2013), “Organizational behavior studies and identifies management activities that promote employee effectiveness…
- 400 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
References: Catlin-Legutko, C., & Klingler, S. (2012). The small museum toolkit: Book 3. Lanham, Md:…
- 2209 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Running Head: GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY General Systems Theory General Systems Theory Strengths Weaknesses Although there are several strengths when organizations utilize general systems theory, there are also weaknesses to this modernistic approach. One example of a weakness is the issues organization may face when one subsystem fails. This can become contagious and cause the organization serious system issues. If one subsystem fails, then the others may not be able to produce without it. An option to counteract this weakness for an organization would be to invest in cross-training subsystems. Application In every organization, general systems theory exists. The organization or system consists of common integrated parts or departments called subsystems. Each subsystem affects the others and also affects the organization as a whole. An example of an organization that demonstrates general systems theory is theprofessional services firm AlixPartners, LLP. Within this organization there are several subsystems or departments (AlixPartners, 2009). The first subsystem in the organization is the executive leadership team. This team sets the vision and mission for the organization. This subsystem also creates and demonstrates the core values of the organization. Without the executive leadership team, the organization would have no purpose. The organization would also not know how to obtain the goals without the leadership teams(AlixPartners, 2009). This subsystem sets the example of the company culture. Another key subsystem that is crucial to the system as a whole is the administrative system. This subsystem includes several departments within it and all contribute to the success of the system. The departments include risk management, finance, human resources, marketing and internal information technology. Without these subsystems, the consultants would not be able to provide clients with their services. Each of the individual departments contributes to…
- 345 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This assignment will assess three main schools of thought that apply to Human Resources Management (HRM). With regards to contemporary HRM concepts it is evident that a consideration of the ‘larger picture’ is necessary to be able to effectively push an organisation towards its ideals goals. A consideration of ‘system thinking’, ‘best practice’ and ‘ best fit’ systems of HRM lead to balanced conclusion that it is necessary for an HR Manager to have a sensitivity to the individual needs of the workforce as well as the ultimate mission of the company. Each system discussed here does this differently here does this differently with each focussing on alternate viewpoints of what is most important; be it the intricacies of the system, the commitment applied to the overreaching goals of the organisation.…
- 4698 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Organizations have evolved in many different ways throughout history. On one spectrum of the different theories that are to be examined is the Scientific Management theory, which has its roots in early forms of organizations and uses a theme that is based on efficiency. The other theory that will be used to compare and contrast with Scientific Management will be Systems theory. These two different perspectives are exactly that, different, however there may be certain types of organizations that would be more efficient using either of the theories as a backbone to the way their organization functions. My interest is based on the basic principles of these theories and the similarities and differences that arise within the core of what they represent. And the different work environments that these two theories are being used and why that may be.…
- 1068 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
References: Balkin, D.B. & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2002) Management Retrieved June 28, 2007 from University of Phoenix Web site:…
- 1125 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
measuring the environment, etc. It acknowledges the role of perceptions of the managers in the process of…
- 3558 Words
- 15 Pages
Best Essays -
Next, was the behavior approach which started in the early 1900’s. This part focuses on understanding the needs and wants of people in a company. By knowing how people deal with different things and different types of people, we can create different ways to manage each individual. I know I like challenging myself so I can learn new things, but some people want to be showed step by step on how to do something. By finding out about different behaviors we are able to adapt to new situations.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Sociotechnical system theory is different from organization behavior because, sociotechnical system is a theory to help design jobs that attempts to redesign tasks to optimize operation of a new technology while preserving employee’s interpersonal relationships and other human aspects at work. It’s effective when their employees have the right tools training and knowledge to make products and services that one valued by customers. Quantitative management shows it’s different in helping manager make decision by developing formal mathematical models of the problem. Instead it finds the best solution to problems. In which then can be applied to different workplace challenges. What make systems theory different is, Systems theory addressed the role of the external environment. A system is a set of interdependent parts or elements which function as a whole in achieving certain goals or objectives.…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Bibliography: BIBLIOGRAPHY l 1031 Griffin, R. W. (2002). Management (7th ed.). Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin.…
- 2166 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays