Preview

Unitary, confederate, and federal government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unitary, confederate, and federal government
There are several advantages and disadvantages to the unitary, confederate, and federal systems of government. The unitary government is often described as a centralized government. It is a government in which all powers held by the government belong to a single and central agency. The central government creates local units of government for its own convenience and needs. Most governments in the world are unitary. Great Britain is an example of a unitary government. The Parliament holds all the power of the British government. Local governments do exist but mainly to relieve Parliament of burdens it could perform only with difficulty and inconvenience.
Advantages of the unitary government include:
1. Less duplication of services and fewer conflicts between national and local governments
2. Uniform policies, laws, political, enforcement, and administration throughout the country
3. Greater unity and stability
4. Simpler management of the economy.
Disadvantages of the unitary government include:
1. Central government out of touch with local concerns
2. Slow in meeting local problems
3. Slow government response (for instance no state National Guard that could be dispatched in emergency, troops would have to be mobilized from national authority).
4. Easily loses track of local issues

The confederate government is an alliance of independent states. The confederate government has the power to handle only those matters that the member states have assigned to it. Usually, confederate governments have limited powers and only in such fields as defense and foreign commerce. In our own history, the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1781 to 1789, and the Confederate States of America, 1861-1865, are examples of the form. Confederations are extremely rare in today’s world. The European Union is the closest approach to a confederation in today’s time.
Advantages of the confederate government include:
1.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism is basically a system adopted by a nation that allows two or more levels of government to have power over the same people and area. This, however, can lead to conflicts since the two governments might try to assert power over the same issue. This can be clearly seen in the Gibbons v. Ogden case. In this case, Chief Marshall was able to use the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to make clear that Congress, and not the states, has the power to regulate commerce between the states. Therefore, this conflict between the two levels of government was resolved by this court decision. If the United States had a unitary government, where all power resided the central government, this issue would not have…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the federal system government, there was an article of confederation (1776-1787), which was designed to keep more power in the states government, and less power in the national government. The article of confederation had much weakness, which calls for a change in the government system. The federal government system which is also known as “Federalism” is a division of power between a central government and state/regional government, and the division of powers are as follow; delegated powers (enumerated), which is expressly given to the national government; reserved powers, which reside in the state; and the concurrent powers granted to both national and state government. The balance and boundaries between the federal government and state…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Confederate System is considered the opposite of the Unitary System. A Confederate System is “A league of sovereign states in which a limited central government exercises free Independent powers.” This system provides a Central Government to deal with areas of mutual concerns, such as, common currency; when it comes to other areas for Confederate Systems to take charge, the member states ban these actions to be taken care of by the Confederate System. “The United States is a confederacy, it was established in 1861.” The Confederation is “A union that consists of parties, united groups, and leagues.” There are also advantages and disadvantages of the confederate system. The advantages of a Confederate System are 1. Keeps power at local levels, preventing the growth of large Central Government. 2. They make it possible for the several states to cooperate in matters of common concerns. The disadvantages are 1. Having a weak…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the battle, both Union and Confederate suffered major casualties. Many Confederate soldiers had died not just in the battle itself. The Unions had suffered the most pain in this way. In just one hour, about 7 thousand men had died and overall they lost 50 thousand men out of 117,000. The Confederates losses were much less severe; they only lost about 1,500 to 60,000…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    States had much more power at their feet than ever before. An example of this was that the states had a great deal of control over politics. One such power was that every colony or state was allowed one vote in Congress (93). Furthermore, the colonies needed a united vote if any amendments were to be made to the Articles of Confederation (Davis). Because there was no national court system under the Confederation, the states resolved controversies amongst themselves. Moreover, the excess power that the Articles placed on the states was with the enforcement of laws; the states had the freedom to enforce any laws they saw fit. Giving states too much power in politics led to chaos that the national government absolutely had no control over (Johnson). Another example of the disarray of domestic affairs was the failure of a successful military. During the American Revolution, the Continental Army was moderate, but once the war was won, the military was largely demobilized (Alden 109). Only a small national force protected the country. The United States’ dream was to build a unified war-making regime, but it was a complete failure, especially after the Revolution (111). America’s dream went spiraling down until there was no hope of a centralized army. The Articles of Confederation government continued…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One government can collect and avail itself of the talents and experience of the ablest men, in whatever part of the Union they may be found. It can move on uniform principles of policy. It can harmonize, assimilate, and protect the several parts and members, and extend the benefit of its foresight and precautions to each. In the formation of treaties, it will regard the interest of the whole, and the particular interests of the parts as connected with that of the whole. It can apply the resources and power of the whole to the defense of any particular part, and that more easily and expeditiously than State governments or separate confederacies can possibly do, for want of concert and unity of system. It can place the militia under one plan of discipline, and, by putting their officers in a proper line of subordination to the Chief Magistrate, will, as it were, consolidate them into one corps, and thereby render them more efficient than if divided into thirteen or into three or four distinct independent companies. If we entered battle what exactly would happen? How, and when, and in what proportion shall aids of men and money be afforded? Who shall command the allied armies, and from which of them shall he receive his orders? Who…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Why did the Framers of the Constitution opt for a federal system rather than a unitary one?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the systems of goverment, there are bound to be many disadvantages, as well as advantages. Ultimatley, the disadvantages and advantages all depend on the size of the state and nation. If there is a larger population, there is automatically a larger window of subjects that make it a go, and subjects that make it a no. Smaller populations tend to have a lower group to choose from. Together there are three branches, Unitary, Confederate, and Federal.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Federalists' opinion some of the detrimental consequences of the confederate system were the lack of an organized treasury, military or government system. Furthermore, the nation suffered from poor commerce; a result of insecure financial transactions, non-regulated interstate trade, and poorly enforced tax laws. They believed that instead of ridding the country of oppression by a superior government, the Articles of Confederation creates conflict between the states and hinders economic prosperity. The emergence of these difficulties early in the life of our nation indicated, to those in favor of the constitution, the fundamental imperfections and the dire need for reform. Hamilton and the Federalists contend that a unified, federal system is more equipped to govern the nation.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The collapse of the Union was a result of the schism separating northern and southern states, originating from differing opinions on slavery which ultimately incited the South’s secession. As the election of 1860 drew near, hopeful democratic and republican candidates emerged despite the already turbulent condition of the nation over the issue of slavery. The Democratic ballot was split between the northern representative Stephen Douglas and southern representative John Breckinridge, while alone on the Republican ballot was Abraham Lincoln. Prior to the election, Lincoln and Douglas became engaged in a series of debates, most of which focused on slavery. Douglas expressed, in his opinion, that African Americans should not be allowed to gain…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, there were 11 Southern states that established their own Government known as the Confederate States of America (Roark, 382). They declared their secession publicly from the United States and strongly maintained the notion of slavery. Slavery was a vital part of Southern society, while the felt threatened; they were convinced that they should strive for independence by seceding (Roark, 403). Southerners anticipated that the threat of secession would force acceptance of demands, but it did not. The Union declared this act as unlawful and ultimately headed to the manifestation of the Civil War.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some portion of the debate that prompted the Civil War (1861– 1865) concerned federalism. Numerous Southerners felt that state governments alone had the power to settle on important choices, for example, whether slavery ought to be legal. Advocates of states' rights supported the individual state governments had the ;supreme law' the central government in light of the fact that the states had created the federal government through the ratification of the Constitution. Most Southern states ended up seceding from the Union since they felt that withdrawal was the best way to secure their rights. Abraham Lincoln and numerous Northerners held that the Union together; their triumph confirmed the national government's right to have control over the…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays