In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…
Political One change was that when the civil war was that the Ulysses S. Grant narrowly won the presidential election. He had received a number of votes from former slaves in the South. Reconstruction acts and military control of the South meant that African Americans had some protection for their new right to vote. Laws giving African Americans the right to vote didn;t exist in most Northern states. Grant received fewer votes in the North.…
Southern states felt that the Northern States had violated the constitution viewing the constitution as a contract agreement. Southern States seceding from the union with a republic similar to the ideas of the founding father while implementing slavery and Christianity. Southern States creating the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy fight the war over the idea of restoring the original vision when the United States was first founded. Also, fighting for state rights to govern themselves and their right to own slaves.…
In what ways did the Constitution struggle to settle the conflicts over federal and state power prior to the Civil War? Examples could include the Mormon expulsion from Missouri, the rise of political parties over constitutional issues, and the sectional conflict over slavery. What issues continue to be debated today?…
After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great…
It is known that the union did not last, for there was the Civil War. If everyone could agree on what the Constitution implied, then there probably would not have been a civil war. The Constitution was clearly interpreted in different ways. There were many conflicts between the north and south about the issue of slavery in the Constitution. This issue was touched up with the compromise of 1850 (Doc A) and the fugitive slave act. One concept of this compromise was known as “popular sovereignty” where Utah and New Mexico decided to vote on whether they want slavery at the time of statehood application. However, the strict fugitive slave law commanded the capture of any runaway slave. After the fugitive slave law was enacted, many personal liberty laws were created in the North and colored people were…
The U.S. Constitution foes not recognize or advocate slavery, thus many Southerners felt that as the minority in the country (Lincoln was able to be elected without one electoral vote from the South) their rights were in danger of being violated. The theory of "popular sovereignty," a favored one in the south, which gave new territories their right to choose whether to allow slavery also led to disunity, as it placed states rights above federal laws and statutes. Furthermore, the South believed the Constitution to be a compact between states, as opposed to a federal government of higher power than those of the states, and thus, they felt that if this compact was broken, Southern states could secede legally and peacefully. Before secession, the South even attempted to exert their power as states within a union, and did so by stating that unless an amendment was added to the Constitution which formalized the legality of slavery the South would leave the…
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to stave off sectional strife. Its goal was to deal with the spread of slavery to territories in order to keep northern and southern interests in balance.…
However the election of Abraham Lincoln was not the only reason for secession, but a rather a series of rooted problems. Sectional tensions between northern and southern states arose as early as the 1840s when America first began its westward expansion into new territories. Every new territory added raised the question of its position on slavery, as the balance between free and slave states was fragile. In an attempt to gain supporters and appeal to both citizens from the north and south, Douglas introduced the idea of popular sovereignty i n which the citizens of the territory would choose whether it entered the Union pro-slavery or anti-slavery. While this may have seemed like a good idea at the time, it did not prove to be so good in Kansas.…
America was a divided nation during the Civil War, starting in 1861 and ending in 1865, the battles were fought on Northern and Southern lands. The Union was faced with eleven states in the South for secession, who wanted nothing more than to be disconnected from the United States. This war was fueled by many disputes, sectionalism being the leading cause. Sectionalism within the United States hindered unity within the country due to expansion issues and conflicting views on slavery.…
When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…
Beginning at Fort Sumter, South Carolina, the Civil War, lasting from 1861 to 1865, was fought between Union and the Confederacy. This war was caused by a series of disagreements between the North and the South leading to secular division and conflict. The social, political and economic differences dividing the Union and the Confederacy ultimately led to the eruption of the war. As a nation the South depended on an agrarian economy in order to prosper.…
Was the failure of the political system to end slavery the cause of the civil war? I think yes. There were many events that led up to the civil war that I think sparked the start of it. For example, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Fugitive Slave Act, and the famous book Uncle Tom’s Cabin.…
They believed that the central government should not be able to make laws that affect every state. Each state should have be able to make their own laws and be able to govern themselves, in the opinion of the Confederacy. This is why when they thought their constitutional rights were being violated and slavery was coming to an end, they decided to secede from the union. They believed that if they seceded that they could govern themselves and the state would have control. This can be seen in that after they seceded each state had its own standing army rather than one with contributions from each state (Conradofontanilla. "Political and Economic Causes of the American Civil War."). On the opposite side were those in the Union. They believed that there should be a strong centralized government to keep the Union together and in sync. They viewed the nation as one big state rather than a bunch of states forced to cooperate under one leader as the south did. Due to this fact, Abraham Lincoln had never originally planned to end slavery. He believed that the Constitution did not provide the federal government with the authority to end slavery (05/31/13, Eric Black). He…
Another cause of the American Civil War was the fight for whether the government would value federal rights over states’ rights. Economic and Social differences caused the Northern States to view certain subjects differently than the Southern States. The South was also afraid that they would be outnumbered in Congressional representation and not properly exhibited. However, the Constitution allows each slave to be counted as three-fifths of a person for population count, which in turn gave the South the advantage when it came to representation. In 1857, the Dred Scott Decision declared the “freed” Negroes did not have citizenship. Northerners were very shaken by this and the South attempted to force them to return freed or runaway slaves to their owners. Not too long after, Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery Republican, was elected into presidency. He was convinced that slavery would never be allowed to be adopted in new territories and will ultimately be abolished. His victory ensured the South that they had drawn the short end of the stick. This sparked a fire in the South and they fell to their only other alternative. South Carolina published its “Declaration of the Causes of Secession.” They knew Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery and believed he would give preferentiality to northern interests. His election resulted in the secession of eleven southern…