Preview

Objections To The Anti Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objections To The Anti Federalists
Anti Federalist Paper

When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights. One of the biggest objections the Anti federalists had towards the Constitution was the Elastic clause. Said clause stated that the government was able to do anything that’s“ necessary and proper” to protect the nation. The Anti Feds viewed this as giving the government boundless power to do whatever they saw fit. The
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution
    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy

    The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing The Federalists And Anti-Federalism
    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing The Federalists And Anti-Federalism

    They were the people who opposed the new constitution. They were afraid of a stronger government.Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Federalists
    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Federalists

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Anti-Federalism
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Anti-Federalism

    In Founding a Nation 1783-1791, the authors claim to mostly agree on inhabitants seeking to acquire “actual settlements” rather than “vacant lands” (VOF, pg. 123). Vacant lands meant property over lands not taken for granted. Landlord companies monopolized the dispersal of lands from the West. Private organizations took custody of distributing land among new incoming colonizers by lobbying the government. Some colonists immigrate across to Ohio over the Appalachian Mountains due to poverty and the War of Independence.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Democrats And Federalists
    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Democrats And Federalists

    They were against the ratification of the Constitution because they felt that the constitution gave the national government too much power, especially over the states. Their central beliefs of government was that it should be focused on a strict interpretation of the Constitution and its necessary and proper clause. Instead of the government having implied powers given to them by the elastic clause, the antifederalists wanted the government to just stick to its already delegated powers stated in the document. In addition, since the Antifederalists wanted the states and the people to have more power over the government, they favored a small national one. They also believed that once the central government has too much power that they’ll impose on the rights of the people almost like the old monarchy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalist
    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalist

    Anti-Federalists wanted more power to the states; they felt that if the Constitution was ratified power would be taken away from the people. These individuals were small farm owners who lived in rural areas. They also believed that they should be able to spend money as they saw fit. The Articles of Confederation and Bill of Rights were important documents to the Anti-Federalists. This party had a majority of America at the time.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. For the Federalists, Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. In the ratification debate, the Anti Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics