Preview

Difference Between Democrats And Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Democrats And Federalists
In American society, there have always been groups that don’t share the same view as the other and are complete opposites. Besides the political parties of the Democrats and the Republicans that are dominant and seen today, another famous political feud that took place long ago was between the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Both groups wanted their political views to be recognized in a document that would lay out a new form of government for the newly independent America. Of course, this came with its own set of problems since each group had trouble cooperating with the other on a number of issues that concerned their new system of government. Since a previous document known as the Articles of Confederation proved to be a fragile system …show more content…
They were against the ratification of the Constitution because they felt that the constitution gave the national government too much power, especially over the states. Their central beliefs of government was that it should be focused on a strict interpretation of the Constitution and its necessary and proper clause. Instead of the government having implied powers given to them by the elastic clause, the antifederalists wanted the government to just stick to its already delegated powers stated in the document. In addition, since the Antifederalists wanted the states and the people to have more power over the government, they favored a small national one. They also believed that once the central government has too much power that they’ll impose on the rights of the people almost like the old monarchy. On economic issues, they felt as if the economy it should be based on farming in order to protect the interests of the many farmers in the colonies. They also strongly opposed a national bank since it allows for the wealthy to have most of the power. Furthermore, they were entirely against the concept of a national debt and wanted the states to handle their own individual debts. Without a doubt, Jefferson and the Antifederalists certainly didn’t want the government to tax the states, especially high taxes and wanted to leave the issue of taxing to be intrastate. Lastly, on the subject of the Bill of Rights, the Antifederalists wholeheartedly wanted one included in the Constitution. This would ease their fears of the government potentially taking advantage of the people and would allow the people to maintain their own natural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are multiple between federalist and Democratic-Republicans. They are Differences Between the First Political Parties. Some of the differences between federalist and Democratic-Republicans is that federalist leader is Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans leader is Thomas Jefferson. The federalist has an alliance with British and the Democratic-Republicans has an alliance with French. Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson always disagreed on many things.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They also felt as if the Union to last there must be a stronger central government. Lastly they wanted the central government to have power that they lacked in the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists that the constitution made the government have too much power. Because the Constitution was making the Central government too strong, the Anti-federalists feared that the states would have no power. They also feared that if the president was elected again, he may abuse the power and act like a king. The federalists would also have no Bill of Rights, and many state constitutions had only one. Later the federalists promised to add the Bill of Rights if the Anti-federalists voted for the Constitution. Both the federalists and the Anti-Federalists gave strong points on why people should or should not vote for the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those in favor of the Constitution called themselves Federalists. Those opposing the Constitution and in favor of more power towards the states called themselves Antifederalists. One strong argument for the Antifederalists side was that the Constitution did not protect the liberties of the people (B). The Constitution did not include a bill of rights which displeased many Americans. When it came time to vote, there were many Antifederalists absent at the polls. Because the Federalists had such figures as Washington and Franklin on their side, as well as organized and aggressive strategies, they were victorious in making the Constitution the law of the United States. The final state to help put this into place was New Hampshire. Even though the majority had voted in favor of the Constitution, some states still opposed it, making them susceptible to succession. Through persuasive speeches and constant campaign, the Federalists won over the final states of New York and Virginia. After a huge demand for a bill of rights from the people, as well as the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, the new government decided one shall be composed…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people in the States believed that the best way to come together as a country was by having a centralised federal government. These people, known as Federalists, supported the adoption of the Constitution. They produced the Federalist Papers to gain support. Their opponents, the Antifederalists, argued that a centralised government would turn into the same type of government from which they had just won independence. As the Constitution did not include citizen’s rights, a Bill of Rights was added after its ratification.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideal society of Jefferson and his followers varied greatly to the federalists’ ideal society. The Jeffersonian Republicans wanted their society to have a central government that barely controlled the lives of the independent farmers. They preferred to have a strong state government. The sole purpose of the government was to protect one’s liberties that the Constitution granted. Jefferson expresses his ideal society in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opposing competitors such as the Jeffersonians led by Thomas Jefferson, who preferred rural life and spoke for southern efforts, believed that it would be more necessary to provide the majority of the power with the individual states. The Jeffersonians also believed that the creation of national banks was unconstitutional, and that it wasn’t permitted by our early forefathers. As differences continued to occur, Americans only saw the gap between the two political parties widening more and more.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-federalists favored limiting the powers granted to the national government in relation both to the states and to the people. They felt that the powers give to the national government should be confined to certain defined national objects. They felt if this didn't happen the national government would destroy, and hinder the power of the state government. The Anti-federalists also saw to it that a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution to place limits on the government’s exercise of power over the citizenry.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans like a lot of the same things? Well, they actually didn't like a lot of the same things and rarely saw eye to eye. One of the many things that they disagreed on or had different takes of it was the government. The Federalists wanted a strong government and would do all that they can to have one. The Republicans, on the other hand, did not want a strong government because they feared that if they had a strong government, they would endanger people's liberties. This is according to the text page 292. Another thing that they disagreed on was the French government or the French in general. The Federalists did not like the French very much but the Republicans did. The Republicans liked the French…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists; Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and George Mason believed in a strong state government. They also believed that the Constitution would give too much power to the president. The Anti-Federalist…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central argument between the two groups was the existence a federal government. The Federalists wanted a federal government, which they believed was necessary to preserve the Union. The Anti-Federalists wanted the majority of the power to rest in the states, just like the Articles of Confederation. Because the Federalists eventually were able to create the Constitution, which set up the new federal government, in conjuncture with the regional governments, the Anti-Federalists created a Bill of Rights to go along with the Constitution. This Bill of Rights would prevent the central government from limiting democracy or restricting the states’/peoples’ rights. Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists believed a tyrannical government could be prevented because of there Bill of Rights.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry was an Antifederalist. He was not for the ratification of the Constitution. He believed that their rights and privileges are endangered and the states will eventually give up.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Antifederalists Were Right” published on September 27, 2006 by Gary Galles in the Mises Daily discusses how the Antifederalists predictions of the dangers of the Constitution were true. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution because they feared a strong central government. However, the Antifederalists reasons for being against the Constitution turned out to be true. First, they feared that vague clauses such as general welfare, necessary and proper, Commerce Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment would allow the government to abuse their power. By claiming that the laws would benefit the country, the federal government could do whatever they wanted.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the transition of power to one single government and the lessening power of the states because they believed that this would increase taxes, almost entirely obliterate the states, cause the government to have uncontrollable power over the people, favor the “well born” over the commoners, and end all forms of civil liberty. If the Anti-Federalists had it their preferred way, then they would not have had the Constitution ratified at all because their beliefs disagreed with it directly. Notable patriots such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry supported the assertion that the federal government was allotted too much power, which they thought would inevitably led to dictatorial control and tyrannical power abuse. The Democratic-Republicans believed that this national form of government would act monarch-like,…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays