Preview

Summary Of The Antifederaliss Were Right

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Antifederaliss Were Right
“The Antifederalists Were Right” published on September 27, 2006 by Gary Galles in the Mises Daily discusses how the Antifederalists predictions of the dangers of the Constitution were true. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution because they feared a strong central government. However, the Antifederalists reasons for being against the Constitution turned out to be true. First, they feared that vague clauses such as general welfare, necessary and proper, Commerce Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment would allow the government to abuse their power. By claiming that the laws would benefit the country, the federal government could do whatever they wanted. Robert Yates, a New York judge, who was a delegate at the Constitutional
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution
    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution

    They also felt as if the Union to last there must be a stronger central government. Lastly they wanted the central government to have power that they lacked in the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists that the constitution made the government have too much power. Because the Constitution was making the Central government too strong, the Anti-federalists feared that the states would have no power. They also feared that if the president was elected again, he may abuse the power and act like a king. The federalists would also have no Bill of Rights, and many state constitutions had only one. Later the federalists promised to add the Bill of Rights if the Anti-federalists voted for the Constitution. Both the federalists and the Anti-Federalists gave strong points on why people should or should not vote for the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United States Marine Corps and Book
    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United States Marine Corps and Book

    1. Identify the author’s mission (task and purpose) in writing this book. Also, why did you choose this book?…

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    Those in favor of the Constitution called themselves Federalists. Those opposing the Constitution and in favor of more power towards the states called themselves Antifederalists. One strong argument for the Antifederalists side was that the Constitution did not protect the liberties of the people (B). The Constitution did not include a bill of rights which displeased many Americans. When it came time to vote, there were many Antifederalists absent at the polls. Because the Federalists had such figures as Washington and Franklin on their side, as well as organized and aggressive strategies, they were victorious in making the Constitution the law of the United States. The final state to help put this into place was New Hampshire. Even though the majority had voted in favor of the Constitution, some states still opposed it, making them susceptible to succession. Through persuasive speeches and constant campaign, the Federalists won over the final states of New York and Virginia. After a huge demand for a bill of rights from the people, as well as the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, the new government decided one shall be composed…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Their Position On Adopting The Constitution In 1787
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Their Position On Adopting The Constitution In 1787

    Some people in the States believed that the best way to come together as a country was by having a centralised federal government. These people, known as Federalists, supported the adoption of the Constitution. They produced the Federalist Papers to gain support. Their opponents, the Antifederalists, argued that a centralised government would turn into the same type of government from which they had just won independence. As the Constitution did not include citizen’s rights, a Bill of Rights was added after its ratification.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Anti-Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Anti-Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences And Similarities Between Federalist And Federalists
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences And Similarities Between Federalist And Federalists

    Federalist and Antifederalist had different ideas and beliefs of the nation’s government. Antifederalist believed in more power for the states and did not agree with a strong central government. They preferred the Articles of Confederation. Antifederalist did not want to ratify the Constitution due the fact there was no bill of rights and there was too much power in the national Constitution and not the States. On the other hand, Federalist believed in a more centralized national government. Federalist propose the separation of powers, which the act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq
    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq

    The Anti-federalists favored limiting the powers granted to the national government in relation both to the states and to the people. They felt that the powers give to the national government should be confined to certain defined national objects. They felt if this didn't happen the national government would destroy, and hinder the power of the state government. The Anti-federalists also saw to it that a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution to place limits on the government’s exercise of power over the citizenry.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists
    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Tyranny And Corruption
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Tyranny And Corruption

    In fear of tyranny and corruption, two arguments against the ratification of the Constitution were that if they increased the power of the central government they would be too far away to help the citizens with their concerns, instead they favored the rights of the states and the active representation of the average citizens. They also argued to keep the unicameral legislature, they believed that local and state governments represented voters more fairly. They also argued that the newly ratified Constitution didn’t guarantee protection for some basic liberties.They also believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal court, they said that the federal courts wouldn’t be able to provide justice to the average citizen like state…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Democrats And Federalists
    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Democrats And Federalists

    They were against the ratification of the Constitution because they felt that the constitution gave the national government too much power, especially over the states. Their central beliefs of government was that it should be focused on a strict interpretation of the Constitution and its necessary and proper clause. Instead of the government having implied powers given to them by the elastic clause, the antifederalists wanted the government to just stick to its already delegated powers stated in the document. In addition, since the Antifederalists wanted the states and the people to have more power over the government, they favored a small national one. They also believed that once the central government has too much power that they’ll impose on the rights of the people almost like the old monarchy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    personal training (basketball)
    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    personal training (basketball)

    Basketball History- basketball was created by Dr. James Naismith. It is now one of the most popular sports around the globe along with soccer. The game was created In 1891 to condition young athletes during the winter. The equipment’s included a picnic basket at first and a soccer style ball. He published 13 rules for the new game. He halved his class of 18 into 2 teams of 9 players each and set about to teach them the fundamentals and rules of his new game. The aim of his new creation was to throw the ball into the baskets nailed to the lower railing of the gym balcony. Every time a point was scored, the game was halted so the janitor could bring out a ladder and retrieve the ball. After they had enough of climbing the ladder to get the ball down, the bottoms of the baskets were removed. The first public basketball game was played in Springfield, Massachusetts, on March 11, 1892.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics