How Did The United States Work In Progress
The United States: A Work In Progress On November 5, 1768, George Washington sent a letter to James Madison, which addresses the need for a stronger government. In that period of time, citizens of the United States felt a sense of insecurity about what their country was turning into. As Washington says in his letter, “We are fast verging to anarchy and confusion... ‘Leave them to themselves, and their government will soon dissolve’, Will not the wise and good strive to avert this problem?” George Washington suggested an overlooking power to ensure the life, liberty, and property of each citizen. Obvious issues with the Articles of Confederation led to constitutional compromises, which resulted in two parties called Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
…show more content…
For example, the Articles did not state a power to raise an army. An army serves as a protection service for their country, so if this was absent, then the nation was functioning in a very dangerous way. This took away the security that all citizens of the United States were promised at the time. Another glaring problem with the government in 1768 is the fact that it lacked a national court system. A court system helps enforce the laws of the nation, which was the underlying problem with the whole government system. Enforcing laws is such a huge necessity because it ensures the fact the country is running in a just and organized way. Because this concept was missing at the time, the country was in a state of bewilderment and on its way to succumbing to an absolute ruler. Obviously, changes needed to be made. Thankfully, the Three- Fifths Compromise and The Great Compromise dealt with sectional differences between the …show more content…
Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the
For example, the Articles did not state a power to raise an army. An army serves as a protection service for their country, so if this was absent, then the nation was functioning in a very dangerous way. This took away the security that all citizens of the United States were promised at the time. Another glaring problem with the government in 1768 is the fact that it lacked a national court system. A court system helps enforce the laws of the nation, which was the underlying problem with the whole government system. Enforcing laws is such a huge necessity because it ensures the fact the country is running in a just and organized way. Because this concept was missing at the time, the country was in a state of bewilderment and on its way to succumbing to an absolute ruler. Obviously, changes needed to be made. Thankfully, the Three- Fifths Compromise and The Great Compromise dealt with sectional differences between the …show more content…
Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the