Preview

Weak Federal Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
837 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Weak Federal Government
Having to rely on people to make or control decisions for you can be a very scary thing and can result in arguments. When talking about the younger years of America we can clearly see what happens when the government has either too much or too little control over its country. In either sense, it will always bring pain, anger, and rebellion.
For example, in 1776, The Articles of Confederation was created as the U.S. first constitution. It was clear that The Articles made a weak federal government thus it gave more power to the states. While the U.S. used the Articles, it faced many economic problems due to the lack of the power of the federal government. One of the main problems was that the federal government is that it had no control to impose
…show more content…
Adams was a federalist who opposed Republicans, or the Democratic Republican Party. Republicans thought that more power should be given to state governments, because they felt that the Federalists were becoming more of a monarch style government. During this time, there was a lot a fear of going to war with France and Federalists accused the Republicans of being “allies” with the French. With fears of enemy immigrates coming into the U.S., Congress passed four new laws, known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien act restricted the activities of foreign residents in the country as it allowed the government to arrest and deport all male citizens of the enemy nation. The sedition act made it illegal to speak out against Adams or the government on how they ran the country. It was not until 1798, where Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions which gave rights to both states to nullify any acts from congress that they thought were …show more content…
To help resolve the is The Missouri Compromise was passed. This would determine lands to the west of the Mississippi as slave states while keeping north of the Mississippi as free states. Most southerners felt that this law favored the north and were designed to hurt the south. It was not until the passing of The Fugitive Slave Law where it seemed like the legislation was clearly in favor of the South. This law meant that people in the free states were forced to return escaped slaves back to their masters in the south. When Abraham Lincoln became the next president in 1860, southerners feared that he would abolish slavery and destroy the south yet again. Having exhausted their legal and political options, they felt that the only way to protect themselves from this Northern assault was to no longer be a part of the United States of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was created in 1820 to put an end to the conflict between the slave and non-slave states, however, it only caused the conflict to worsen. The dispute began to get worse and worse, eventually making the sectionalism between the North and South increase. The Missouri Compromise ignited sectionalism within the United States, which further contributed to a terrible War.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the beginning of westward expansion, the issue of slavery in the newly settles territory became an important and dividing political issue. The Missouri Compromise tried to reach an agreement between the North and South, admitting Maine as a free state, but Missouri as a slave state. Although the Missouri Compromise was unsuccessful in satisfying the North and South, it was important in that it marked the boundary for slavery in the territory…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Including that John Adams was president in the late 1700’s, he was a member of the Federalist Party. Federalists were already worried that the inundation of French into the country could become a powerful voting block since Adams and other federalist were Pro-British. The alien and sedition Acts were passed by the federalist controlled congress to deal with such a problem. The…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neither piece of his advice was headed as while he was still President, two of cabinet members, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, had followers in political belief who coined themselves, Democratic-Republicans and Federalists, respectively. This division amongst Americans continued to widen into the days of Adams’ federalist administration over such issues as Native American placement and dealings with the French. These heated topics spurred on much debate and public criticism from the Democratic- Republicans who had other ideas as to how the situations should be handled. In an attempt to stop the dissenters from speaking poorly against the government, Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Aimed primarily had the Democratic- Republicans, the acts allowed for the deportation or arrest of any immigrant thought undesirable by the President and immediate arrest of any one defaming the government or thought suspicious. Being unconstitutional as they were, this law angered Democratic- Republicans and they called, reasonably enough, for its retraction. In due response to the acts, Democratic-Republican leaders, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, created resolutions, which were adopted by Kentucky and Virginia legislatures, that allowed states the principle of nullification, or the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alien and Sedition acts were passed by the Federalists in the United States congress in 1798, and they were signed into the law by President John Adams. The alien and sedition acts were four laws, one of which was called the Naturalization Act, another was the Alien Act, the two others were the Alien Enemies Act, and the Sedition Act. The four acts were passed in order to try controlling the activities of the foreigners in the United States during impending war.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was an agreement made that allowed for Missouri to join the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state to ensure the equal representation. A line is drawn across the map which it excludes slavery from any point north of parallel 36:30 below that line, would be able to come in a slave state and above the line would become free states. This compromise was a solution that would postpone the civil…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was the resolution to the conflict involving those for slavery (the South) against those opposed to slavery (the North). Antagonism between the North and the South began to emerge in 1820 when Missouri applied to the United States as a slave state. At the time, in 1819, the United States had exactly eleven slave states and exactly eleven free states; by allowing Missouri into the nation, that balance would be disrupted and the Senate would be spiked towards the South. Missouri was admitted into the nation, however, the House approved an amendment outlawing any imported slaves from Africa to Missouri and set the children of slaves free. Ultimately the Senate rejected the amendment forcing Missouri out of the nation.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alien and Sedition Acts were not merely intended for immigrants who spoke out against the government but more to detain the growth of the Democratic - Republican Party. These four Acts coercively lessoned the likelihood of the party mounting power by eliminating its majority group; soon to be citizens. Many issues led up to the creation of the Acts. This Cause and Effect can be traced all the way back to George Washington's Presidency; a few years after the creation of the Constitutional government after the Articles of Confederation were expulsed.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist authorities and their supporters claimed that the laws were motivated by the need to protect the nation against destabilizing foreign factors in such a revolutionary era (Neuman 54). However, the Republican opposition thought that the true reason was domestic politics. At the time, the split of politics to the federalist and democratic sides made the government uncomfortable, especially considering that immigrants were also political. The Naturalization Act for instance was therefore meant to deal with French and Irish immigrants who tended to engage themselves a lot in republican political activity (Neuman 53). The other alien acts were also supposed to intimidate foreign critics and the Sedition Act to suppress the media and therefore protect the federalist…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The weak and reactionary Articles of Confederation failed to adequately address the rights of colonies; each state had diverse needs that were not being represented in the government. The Articles were drafted in fear that a tyrannical government would emerge after the Revolution, but they were too powerless to enforce taxation. These issues were rectified by the Constitution’s strong centralized government.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Controversy of the Alien and sedition acts In 1796, the federalist, John Adams, was elected as the second president of the United States. At this time the french revolution had been going on for seven bloody years. the federalist party was antipathetic toward the revolution but the ever popular democratic republican party continued, as they always did, to espouse it. America under George Washington had professed neutrality in the French Revolution but the French disregarded this and attacked American commerce ships.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you can see this was a very bad choice that america made. It would not let people in the country and was also kicking people out of it. Some kids had to make tough decisions that could change there whole life. People could not say anything about the government in fear of being arrested for what you say and not be able to go to court and have a trial. As you can see john adams did not make the best choices when he was the president but if not for him america would not have seen what could…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays