Preview

Anti Federalist Viewpoints

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti Federalist Viewpoints
The Anti-Federalist viewpoint is valid, and should be considered seriously. Their ideas on federalism and the Constitution were similar to the Federalists, but the Anti-Federalists wanted to add more precautions to the Constitution, and were especially careful about preventing tyranny from happening within the states. The Anti-Federalists were focussed on individual rights, and wanted the states to have a high power in the government. Each state at the time was vital for the growth of the United States, as it is today. Their pressing for the Bill of Rights was extremely important then, and equally important in this modern age. This is why the Anti-Federalist view should come to light to the people of the United States.
The Federalists believed
…show more content…
A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."
The idea of a pure democracy was disapproved, as interests of a minority group could dominate other interests, and only support those certain groups rather than the majority. They also wished to avoid aristocracy, which could lead similar events under tyranny. The Federalists approved of the Constitution without believing in further adjustment or editing. They attempted to justify immediate ratification, though the Anti-Federalists voiced their criticism, including adding a bill of rights. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 84:
“It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, [bills of rights] have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular
…show more content…
They also believed that pure democracy and aristocracy would be harmful to the country, as evident in this quote from “New Constitution Creates a National Government, Will not Abate Foreign Influence, Dangers of Civil War and Despotism”, “If the body of the people will not govern themselves, and govern themselves well too, the consequence is unavoidable—a FEW will, and must govern them.” The quote believes in elected representatives for the people of the nation. However, the Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution would not only take power away from the states, but more importantly had already stated a minor amount of rights to be protected. Some rights that were not listed, the Anti-Federalists believed, should be documented within a bill of rights to assure their preservation, as described in this quote from “Foreign Wars, Civil Wars, and Indian Wars—Three Bugbears“, “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists where two political parties during the 1700s and early 1800s. “The supporters of the new Constitution immediately adopted the name Federalists to describe themselves. Their opponent had to contend themselves with the negative label Anti-Federalist”(Faragher 180). The Federalist believed in a strong federal government that would over see the country for the most part, where the Anti-Federalist believed that the states should have more power and not have a great influence from the federal government. The Federalist won is most part because of the people that lived in these Anti-Federalist states wanting to adopted the constitution.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The average citizen did not feel that they would get their fair level of representation and that the government would be out of touch with their needs. The Anti-Federalists were also worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. It was important to the people that they had a solid form of protection that covered basic liberties including freedom of speech and trial by jury. The Federalist needed the support of the Anti-Federalist and considered it a compromise by adding the bill of right if the antifederalist voted for the constitution. The bill of right was added in…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The anti-federalists were also concerned that the original text of the constitution did not contain a bill of rights. They thought the new constitution failed to protect personal liberties and individual rights and that a stronger government was a threat to the sovereignty of the states. After long debate the members of the newly established House of Representatives approved twelve amendments. Ten of these amendments were known as the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government can be a complicated system to understand, but one thing I have come to notice is it either you are for something or you are against something. One that is known to many is either the Federalist or the Anti-Federalist. To be considered a Federalist, they want a strong national government and were all for the approval of the Constitution to aid the debt and tensions. To be consider an Anti- Federalist, they were people who opposed a strong federal government and were for the Article of Confederation instead. They preferred for the power to remain in the state and local governments. Some major points of disagreement between the Federalist and Antifederalist visions of the United States were central government and important documents.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays