Preview

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.
The Federalists believed that a strong central government was needed because of the cruel remarks that were made against America in European courts. (Doc. 1) These remarks led the
…show more content…
(Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.
The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 13 articles in the constitution, the anti-federalists were all about the articles becuase it gave more power to the states, the federalists did not agree with that. There were many problems with the articles of confederation one of them being that 9 of the 13 states had to agree with a law in order to pass it. Another problem was since there was no president or executive branch there was no way to guarantee laws passed by congress were carried out. There were also no courts to judge or pune the law because there was no national court system.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people in the States believed that the best way to come together as a country was by having a centralised federal government. These people, known as Federalists, supported the adoption of the Constitution. They produced the Federalist Papers to gain support. Their opponents, the Antifederalists, argued that a centralised government would turn into the same type of government from which they had just won independence. As the Constitution did not include citizen’s rights, a Bill of Rights was added after its ratification.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists where two political parties during the 1700s and early 1800s. “The supporters of the new Constitution immediately adopted the name Federalists to describe themselves. Their opponent had to contend themselves with the negative label Anti-Federalist”(Faragher 180). The Federalist believed in a strong federal government that would over see the country for the most part, where the Anti-Federalist believed that the states should have more power and not have a great influence from the federal government. The Federalist won is most part because of the people that lived in these Anti-Federalist states wanting to adopted the constitution.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (John Adams and Jefferson) were running for president. The Federalists wanted a strong central government with more power than what they had at that time. The Anti-Federalists were the exact opposite. They wanted a small central government with minimal power, that gave most of the power to the states. These two ideas would then become the main topics of debate for future government campaigns.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anti-federalist was against a strong federal government right from the start. They believed if the federal government got too strong it would just take all the power away from each individual state. The anti-federalists fought to expand the amount of representation and felt that on a larger scale corruption would be less likely to go on. Smith in his speeches states, "In so small a number of representatives, there is great danger from corruption and combination" (Melancton Smith, Speeches pg 583). Smith and the rest of the anti-federalists felt that if the representation was too small then factions will form. Factions within a government will form no matter what but factions within the most elites of society can be very detrimental to a government. John Mercer goes on too in his essays to say "The few representatives can always corrupt themselves by legislative speculations, from the pockets of their numerous…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1787, when delegates gathered in Philadelphia to the draft a new constitution for the country. Curtain groups of people at the time think that the old document "Article of Confederation" was going to divide this country apart. At the time, there were two parties, one opposed the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a new plan of government was presented in the ratification of the Constitution, two coalitions of people were created: Federalists, who supported the new Constitution; and the Anti-Federalists, who were against the new form of government. During the Constitutional Convention, both parties presented their case, their form of government and evidence supporting why that was the best way for America to be governed. America must have a National and a State government in order to function properly and fulfill its people’s needs.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalists wanted our government to remain the same; a monarchy. This would cause distrust in the government because of the possible corruption. Federalists felt we should have a central government. They preferred a government with three branches. I feel they cared more about the feelings of the people. Which is why I have sided with the federalist.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the two primary political parties at the time the Constitution was written. However, these two groups preferred different types of government. Nevertheless, Federalists wanted a government that was strong and powerful at the heart and was ruled mostly by the upper class, while Anti-Federalists preferred a government that wasn’t ruled so much by the central government, but more ruled by the states so that they could have their own rights.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believed the constitution gave excessive power to the federal government and thought the Constitution would create a government that the people could not control. Anti-Federalists had argued that a strong national government in a large nation would be prone to the abuses that had destroyed republics since ancient times. They also believed that certain systems among the branches would eventually turn against the people's liberties and no longer protect the rights of the people.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays