Preview

Dbq Anti Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Anti Federalists
The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification …show more content…
The average citizen did not feel that they would get their fair level of representation and that the government would be out of touch with their needs. The Anti-Federalists were also worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. It was important to the people that they had a solid form of protection that covered basic liberties including freedom of speech and trial by jury. The Federalist needed the support of the Anti-Federalist and considered it a compromise by adding the bill of right if the antifederalist voted for the constitution. The bill of right was added in …show more content…
The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the debates over ratification of the new constitution, each party's stance was clear. The Federalists preferred a strong central government, while the Antifederalists favored a more decentralized form of government. The Federalists believed that a strong centralized government was needed to insure the liberty and security of the people. They felt that the separation of power between the states was too unstable to run the country properly. With the many different conflicts that would arise from such a large division of power, the public's best interest would be overlooked. They also felt that it was the unity of the public's…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who were the anti-federalists? Describe their views during the ratification debates and identify an important part of the Constitution that resulted from their involvement. Anti-federalists were a group of diverse individuals that opposed the new federal constitution. They were united by their fear of the new constitution that placing more power in the hands of national government was dangerous.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central argument between the two groups was the existence a federal government. The Federalists wanted a federal government, which they believed was necessary to preserve the Union. The Anti-Federalists wanted the majority of the power to rest in the states, just like the Articles of Confederation. Because the Federalists eventually were able to create the Constitution, which set up the new federal government, in conjuncture with the regional governments, the Anti-Federalists created a Bill of Rights to go along with the Constitution. This Bill of Rights would prevent the central government from limiting democracy or restricting the states’/peoples’ rights. Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists believed a tyrannical government could be prevented because of there Bill of Rights.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    under the Articles of Confederation, just edit it a little. They wanted the states to hold the supreme power rather than the national government. Most feared that the constitution would turn our government into a monarchy. Brutus I made the statement, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“ The name Anti-federalist is actually misleading, they were actually more for federalism than the federalist, as they wanted the power more separated to the states. Their thoughts were that a government under the constitution would lead to corruption as the power hungry federal government would become corrupt and try to consolidate all of the power.“In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power. In some weighty instances, (as making all kinds of treaties, which are to be the laws of the land,) they have the whole legislative and executive powers. They, jointly, appoint all officers, civil and military; and they (the Senate) try all impeachments, either of their own members or of the officers appointed by themselves.“ -Richard Henry…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic ideas of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are that the Federalists were for the adoption of the Constitution while the Anti-federalists were against adopting the Constitution. Federalists wanted a strong central government that can rule the U.S straightforward instead of through the state government. For example, Federalists wanted a system that contained a strong federal court, allowed the federal government to raise taxes directly from the people, and fund the state militias. Anti-federalists were the opposite and wanted a weak government that could serve the functions of the government. For example, Anti-federalists were opposed to the U.S. Supreme Court to have jurisdiction, receive money from the state governments, and…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason that motivated the Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was to protect basic humans rights won from the American Revolution so that a strong national government will not be able to take such rights away. So that certain common liberties and rights would be protected no matter what. Most of which was fueled by the fear of a tyrannical government that would be too powerful, and would have unchecked power to do whatever…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists wanted more power to the states; they felt that if the Constitution was ratified power would be taken away from the people. These individuals were small farm owners who lived in rural areas. They also believed that they should be able to spend money as they saw fit. The Articles of Confederation and Bill of Rights were important documents to the Anti-Federalists. This party had a majority of America at the time.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays