Preview

Bill Of Rights Vs Anti-Federal Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bill Of Rights Vs Anti-Federal Government
In the midst of the eighteenth century, America was beginning to establish an identity for itself and a form of self government that would govern its own government and citizens alike in a systematic way. A system in which united the states of America into a unified state. For America was going through economic turmoil and power struggle after gaining independence from Great Britain after the American revolution. American citizens feared that if the government was given too much power, their own rights and liberty would be infringed upon. To solve this issue, Virginian George Mason met with states delegates on September 12, 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. To proposed that the bill of rights should be added to the recently created Constitution, …show more content…
One were deemed as Federalist, who sought that broad power and authority should reside in the federal government. While the Anti-Federalist, sought that power should reise in state governments, where it could best protect people’s liberties. Both of which were in continuous conflict with one another, for their vision for America were totally different and wanted a someone from their own group to run government to see fit their best interest at heart. One reason that motivated Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was that they were the minority group. And so they feared that the Federalist, who were ruled the majority would form a much too powerful central government that would infringe their liberties and rights. The Bill of Rights made it so, that the power of the federal government be limited. And that the minority of states in America, be equally represented just as much as the large populated Federalist states.
Another reason that motivated the Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was to protect basic humans rights won from the American Revolution so that a strong national government will not be able to take such rights away. So that certain common liberties and rights would be protected no matter what. Most of which was fueled by the fear of a tyrannical government that would be too powerful, and would have unchecked power to do whatever
…show more content…
Giving its citizen a peace of mind and sense of safety and protection. Fortifying the popular support of its people for the success of a new government. As well as unifying the last two remaining states, Rhode Island and North Carolina, who were initially opposed to any form of the Constitution. This made it so that every state would be agreeably accepting of a new federal government run by Federalists.
Another reason that motivated Federalist to pass the Bill of Rights was that it would surely crush the opposition of Anti-Federalist leaders and followers. For after some provision were made by the Bill of Rights, the fear that a new federal government having tyrannical power was quickly relieved, for it ensured basic rights of all citizens in the United States. This made the support of the Anti-Federalist movement diminished drastically, and as a safety net so that the few powerful Anti-Federalist would not be able to weaken the new federal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    powers. The idea that power needed a limit came from the Magna Carta 1215/ if all the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 25 of 1791. Federalism wanted some kind of centralized government and the anti-federalists were willing of a centralized government only if a bill of rights were to be adopted which secured their rights and gave limits on government power. Alexander did not agree with the BOR because he believed that people were going to take advantage of those rights not included in the BOR. James Madison proposed 12 amendments but 2 were dismissed and 10 were ratified. After the Declarations of Independence was ratified congress decided to build a Constitution a factor that influenced that decision was shays rebellion which were the farmers who didn't want to pay there debt making and made riots. Congress believed they needed to strengthen the government therefore the Constitution was created as well as the Bill of Rights which was enacted to protect against giving the central gov too much power and limiting the power of the federal government of the U.S and protected the rights of all citizens. The final form of the constitution was…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-federalists favored limiting the powers granted to the national government in relation both to the states and to the people. They felt that the powers give to the national government should be confined to certain defined national objects. They felt if this didn't happen the national government would destroy, and hinder the power of the state government. The Anti-federalists also saw to it that a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution to place limits on the government’s exercise of power over the citizenry.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Bill of Rights was the main cause of the ratification between Anti-federalist and Federalist, one side the Anti- federalist…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? The purpose of it is to save the Anti-Federalists because from the beginning, they thought that the Constitution favored a central government too heavily. They did not agree that the balance of power provided for by the Constitution prevented one branch from becoming too powerful. They were scared that the Congress and the court system were too far removed from the people of the nation and that the voice of the people was not likely to be heard. There are other things to know about the purpose of Bill of Rights. Here are three.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have the same goal in mind of how to make this country better, but have totally two different ways to approach the matter. The Anti-Federalists want the states to be in control. They believe that strong central government would threaten the people liberty and freedom. Their ideal government is the states and its people to be in charge, and the reason why is mainly because they do not want to have the same system of government like England. But, for the Federalists, they want to have a strong central government. The Federalists argued that, if the states were to have control, the country would be teared apart. On the Federalist #10 written by James Madison, he wrote that “There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” The Federalists were afraid that by having too group of individuals with power, it can cause chaos by everyone have a voice and their interests. The Federalists wants a strong central government, so it can represent the people interest. Also, the Federalists think that with the check and balance system, the people freedom and liberty would be protected. According to the Federalist No. 51, it says “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.” The Federalists want each branch of the government has its own agenda and power. But, no branch can overpower the others, so therefore the people freedom can be protected because no…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It came from the ones who were striving to help this new nation stand on its two feet. It came from the great minds like: James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Wilson, John Marshall, John Dickinson, Roger Sherman, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and the list goes on and on. But the Anti-Federalist wanted to make sure that they would be getting before they would sign the Constitution. When the Bill of Rights was written it had only been 8 years since the American Revolutionary War had ended and the young nation was trying to figure out how to run thins without a monarchy. Why did the Founding Fathers think that we should need the Bill of Rights?…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays