Preview

Federalists Vs Anti Federalist

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
227 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists Vs Anti Federalist
The Federalists believed in a strong central government. They supported the Constitution, central banking and financial policies as a way to cure the economy. They wished to depend on the nation, rather than the state, to provide security and counsel. Most Federalists were artisans, merchants and large farm owners.
Anti-Federalists wanted more power to the states; they felt that if the Constitution was ratified power would be taken away from the people. These individuals were small farm owners who lived in rural areas. They also believed that they should be able to spend money as they saw fit. The Articles of Confederation and Bill of Rights were important documents to the Anti-Federalists. This party had a majority of America at the time.
…show more content…
The Anti-Federalists had more people at the time, but they were diverse and uncoordinated. The Federalists wrote over 80 essays, called The Federalist Papers, stating their positions; they were also able to successfully make the Anti-Federalists understand that the constitution was flexible and would allow some aspects of The Bill of Rights in the document. Federalists claimed that their Constitution would bring more democracy to the nation. They also brought attention to the economic and commercial state, all of which was greatly damaged after the Revolutionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Government Final Notes

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - Anti-federalist were those who favored strong state governments and a weak national government; opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was being written and ratified, there were two main political factions, each having ideas that were vastly diverse from each other. While Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist, many of the other Constitution makers were Federalists. John Adams, a Federalist, was elected as the second American president in 1796 and served in office until 1800.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists were in favor of a strong central government, they took actions which demonstrated the authority of the federal government. Actions like John Adams, while in office had signed the sedition acts of 1798. The sedition act prohibited anyone from opposing the government. According to document F, “That if anyone shall write, print, utter, or…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-federalists favored limiting the powers granted to the national government in relation both to the states and to the people. They felt that the powers give to the national government should be confined to certain defined national objects. They felt if this didn't happen the national government would destroy, and hinder the power of the state government. The Anti-federalists also saw to it that a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution to place limits on the government’s exercise of power over the citizenry.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists and anti-Federalists have many differences and similarities the Federalists want the power to be in the hands of the government and wanted a stronger federal government. While anti-Federalists believed a small state would make it easier to find a common good for their citizens and were against the American Constitution. Federalism is a political concept describing the practice whereby a group of members are bound together by agreement or covenant with a governing representative head. ("Federalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia," n.d.) Federalists believed in a more vigorous centralized regime and that the states were essentially part of one combination that could play a role of laws upon all states. This party was primarily…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist Papers were a set of documents written mostly by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. It was a treatise on free government in peace and security. The main topic discussed in the Federalist Papers were one: the defects of the government and the Articles of Confederation. And two: the new constitution's different components of the three branches of the government. The intent of the Federalist Papers was to secure the ratification of a constitution providing for a more perfect union. The Federalist Papers depicted that the Union appears as a means to achieve the safety and welfare of its parts. In general, the Federalists discusses federalism as a means to achieve free government in peace and security. The five basic themes included…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic ideas of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are that the Federalists were for the adoption of the Constitution while the Anti-federalists were against adopting the Constitution. Federalists wanted a strong central government that can rule the U.S straightforward instead of through the state government. For example, Federalists wanted a system that contained a strong federal court, allowed the federal government to raise taxes directly from the people, and fund the state militias. Anti-federalists were the opposite and wanted a weak government that could serve the functions of the government. For example, Anti-federalists were opposed to the U.S. Supreme Court to have jurisdiction, receive money from the state governments, and…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists were for ratification, supporting the Constitution and everything in it. A few Federalists by the names of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a collection of eighty-five articles and essays about the Constitution under the pseudonym Publius. Anti-Federalists did not support the Constitution for many reasons, one being the fact that it did not have a Bill of Rights. Another complaint was that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, putting the states in danger.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antifederalists rallied behind the ideologies of the Revolution. They saw the federalists as monarchical, detouring from the wants and needs of the people in search for national glory. Patrick Henry and Edmund Randolph both feared that states would lose their right to govern their own people and thus, each state should be able to govern as its own independent entity. They stressed the importance of virtues representation, fearing the proposed congress would be too much like parliament, and the president too much like a king. However, the antifederalists could not agree on an alternative form of government that would fit their agrarian “good society.” They pressed for a Bill of Rights, to ensure individuals would keep their rights and the “ordinary people” would not be forgotten by the monarchs in charge. They wanted to ensure that Revolutionary themes of sovereignty and direct representation would not be lost with the new constitution, placing more importance on their proposed Bill of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists definantly protected the people of their country from tyranny. Before the federalists, the anti-federalists ruled the states, and they were very tyrannous. For example, they wanted all of the states to each take up a portion of the debt from the revolutionary war. This was easily payable by the larger states that had much industry, but for the smaller or less industrially developed states, this was a debt that they were just not able to handle. The federalists finally decided when they had the power that they would assume the debt as a part of a deal to move the capitol to Washington, D.C. This is just one example of how the anti-federalists tried to control the citizens while the federalists wanted to free the people and give them a chance to lead a free life. The federalist party definantly gave the people of the United States opportunity. The anti-federalists, however, did not. They not only jailed those in debt, but also they never set up a national bank to make loans so that people could cope with their debt. From setting up a national bank to helping people in debt, the federalists were able to lend money and keep people from being imprisoned for owing money. This allowed for the opportunity to grow and to expand to many of the…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalist viewpoint is valid, and should be considered seriously. Their ideas on federalism and the Constitution were similar to the Federalists, but the Anti-Federalists wanted to add more precautions to the Constitution, and were especially careful about preventing tyranny from happening within the states. The Anti-Federalists were focussed on individual rights, and wanted the states to have a high power in the government. Each state at the time was vital for the growth of the United States, as it is today. Their pressing for the Bill of Rights was extremely important then, and equally important in this modern age. This is why the Anti-Federalist view should come to light to the people of the United States.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists really make everything clear and put the government and what it has taken from the Americans on display. They start off by saying that what the Revolution was fought for- Peace, liberty, safety, and public good- was ignored. Instead the government influenced its own independence from its people. They begin their conclusion of this argument by stating that, the constitution is to better spread over the government and avoid selfishness between the branches. They finish off by making the fact the governments importance will expand in the time of war.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Predominantly, the Federalist papers communicated an idea of a strong central government, hence their overall vision and plan of the country was to support the republicanism suggested in the constitution that assumed that the…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays