What Are The Arguments Against The Ratification Of Constitution
The definition of constitution is the fundamental laws or principles by which a nation is governed, usually embodied in a written document. The US Constitution is what turned our country’s government around. It is the oldest written document still in operation in the world.
The ratification process for the Constitution took about ten months. Article Seven says that the new government under the Constitution would not start until conventions in at least nine states (two-thirds of the colonies) approved the Constitution. The names of the state deputies are listed in it, probably in the hand of a clerk. The first nine states that approved it were Delaware (December 1787), Pennsylvania (December 1787), New Jersey (December 1787), Georgia (January …show more content…
The Federalists were for ratification, supporting the Constitution and everything in it. A few Federalists by the names of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a collection of eighty-five articles and essays about the Constitution under the pseudonym Publius.
Anti-Federalists did not support the Constitution for many reasons, one being the fact that it did not have a Bill of Rights. Another complaint was that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, putting the states in danger. Others said that the framers were making an illegal document by creating the Constitution. Governor George Clinton expressed many of these objections in several published newspaper articles under the pseudonym Cato.
The Constitution is made up of compromises. Without them, many states would not have ratified it. One of them is the Three-Fifths Compromise, which is about whether or not slaves would get a vote. They came to the conclusion that for every five slaves’ votes, there would be three white men’s. Another is National Vs. State Sovereignty. The larger states had the advantage since they had a larger population, causing them to get to have more congressmen. They compromised with the smaller states, who put up a fight, and decided to have two senators and congressmen proportionate to the
The ratification process for the Constitution took about ten months. Article Seven says that the new government under the Constitution would not start until conventions in at least nine states (two-thirds of the colonies) approved the Constitution. The names of the state deputies are listed in it, probably in the hand of a clerk. The first nine states that approved it were Delaware (December 1787), Pennsylvania (December 1787), New Jersey (December 1787), Georgia (January …show more content…
The Federalists were for ratification, supporting the Constitution and everything in it. A few Federalists by the names of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a collection of eighty-five articles and essays about the Constitution under the pseudonym Publius.
Anti-Federalists did not support the Constitution for many reasons, one being the fact that it did not have a Bill of Rights. Another complaint was that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, putting the states in danger. Others said that the framers were making an illegal document by creating the Constitution. Governor George Clinton expressed many of these objections in several published newspaper articles under the pseudonym Cato.
The Constitution is made up of compromises. Without them, many states would not have ratified it. One of them is the Three-Fifths Compromise, which is about whether or not slaves would get a vote. They came to the conclusion that for every five slaves’ votes, there would be three white men’s. Another is National Vs. State Sovereignty. The larger states had the advantage since they had a larger population, causing them to get to have more congressmen. They compromised with the smaller states, who put up a fight, and decided to have two senators and congressmen proportionate to the