Preview

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay
In the late 1700s, there was a surplus of arguments supporting or fighting against ratifying the Constitution. Ratification of the Constitution is not what's best for U.S citizens because although the Bill of Rights was proved to be successful, the insecurity of rights amongst the people, as well as the massive amount of influence that the people of power had; this will not lead to a successful nation. Documents three points out many major holes in the ratification of the Constitution such as insecurity in rights. Document four gives a supporting view as to why the United States should ratify the Constitution, it discusses how Massachusetts solved one problem, the insecurity of rights. Document five points out the people’s fear in the …show more content…
Document four is a direct counter argument to document three. Document four is an excerpt from a resolution from the Massachusetts Constitutional Ratification Convention. It discusses the fact that Massachusetts only passes the Constitution given that certain rights would pass as well. Reassuring the people that their rights would be protected. Document four discusses how Massachusetts also said that a bill of rights would completely resolve all the problems and worries that were discussed in document three.
Back to the opposing view of the ratification of the Constitution is Document five. Document five talks about the types of people that are trying to get into congress, and may be in congress fool the citizens with their nice and smart voices as well as their money; when really they only discuss the tip of the matter with you. And aren’t doing as much as they could be doing. The document also talks about that theses people who have the money are able to use that money to travel to Philadelphia and have an impact on congress, and their impact will most likely be in the best interest of the wealthy rather than the interest of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    2. Federalist Papers-aimed to convince Americans to accept the new Constitution. Published in New York. Written by Hamilton, Madison, Jay. Patrick Henry of Virginia and George Clinton argued against the constitution saying it takes away individual rights, replicates monarchy, and doesn’t have a bill or rights, and was illegal. The federalists had Franklin & Washington in their meetings=major plus. Led the Federalists to add a Bill of Rights. Clinton also published essay under the name “Cato” going against the constitution. See antifederalists, Hamilton.…

    • 3959 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Mason’s “Objections to the Constitution” was published in October. His assertions reached every state, and Anti-Federalists adopted Mason’s work to disagree publicly with the Constitution. Mason was believed to have claimed he would rather cut off his hand than endorse the Constitution. He argued against the absence of a bill of rights and was convinced the House of Representatives was too limited to represent the citizens appropriately, the Senate obtained too much authority, the federal judiciary would damage the state judiciaries, and finally the president would be the tool in the hands of his advisers or of the Senate. Moreover, Mason had been aghast that the Convention permitted the slave trade to remain until 1808.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. Imagine you are either a Federalist or Anti-Federalist. Argue for (or against) ratification of the Constitution. Include economic status, geographic region and political ideals in your argument.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates - U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people. The state legislatures ' decisions to hold ratifying conventions confirmed the Constitution 's legitimacy.... [tags: Papers]…

    • 6771 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These historians do not believe Charles Beard's thesis and try to disprove his thoughts and prove that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are people having public security holdings, who are people from all different backgrounds. The Delegates mostly signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looking out for them. There was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to benefit the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the New York State Ratifying Convention shows that there was a mixes of people with different economic status voting for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to want…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The states however were not satisfied if the requirements would be presented to them completely. For the most part some states led by George Mason from Virginia requested and enforced a Bill of Rights to be ratified before the final document was galvanized. Ratification for the Bill of Rights would prove crucial strain for the US Constitution simply because it would set thickened safeguards for citizens and protect rights of those accused of criminal infringements (O 'Connor and Sabato 2009, pg. 57). Enacted into law, the new Constitution was ratified and enacted. Everyone was not pleasant entirely with it. Benjamin Franklin…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story, Arguments against Ratification at the Virginia Convention was all about the delegates at the Virginia Convention debating the constitution and the ninth vote for ratification which many pushed for. In the book it says, “...the acceptance of only nine states would not have boded well for strength and unity of the new nation, so the Constitution's supporters set out to make ratification a unanimous mandate for change”. They pushed hard to convince nine states…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A lot of people think that the constitution should not be ratified but I think that the constitution should be ratified for three main reasons.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fear of tyranny and corruption, two arguments against the ratification of the Constitution were that if they increased the power of the central government they would be too far away to help the citizens with their concerns, instead they favored the rights of the states and the active representation of the average citizens. They also argued to keep the unicameral legislature, they believed that local and state governments represented voters more fairly. They also argued that the newly ratified Constitution didn’t guarantee protection for some basic liberties.They also believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal court, they said that the federal courts wouldn’t be able to provide justice to the average citizen like state…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US Constitution Process

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document 5: Amos Singletree opposed Massachusetts ratifying the Constitution because the illiterates or less educated, him included, feared the Constitution would be used by “monied men” or lawyers, bankers, merchants, etc… to obtain the money and power in their hands because of their high class education.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry revealed their belief that the act of ratifying the constitution would eventually create a monarchy. Henry addressed, “I need not take much pains to show that the principles of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy, like England a compact between prince and people, with checks on the former to secure the liberty of the latter?” Patrick Henry spread his message on how unsafe the Anti-Federalists felt, believing their public liberty would be taken away with the ratification.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the United States won the war against England in Yorktown it was up to the colonists to build a government from the ground up. The decisions made in the creation of the United States were arguably the most important events in the united states. In the year 1788 the Constitution was ratified by New Hampshire, officially doing away with articles of the confederation that so heavily hindered the government previously, creating a more balanced government that is still in place today.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    third

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the constitution to be ratified, however, nine of the thirteen states were required to approve it in state conventions. Opposition to ratification ("Anti-Federalism") was partly based on the Constitution's lack of adequate guarantees for civil liberties.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays