Preview

Summary Of George Mason's Objections To The Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of George Mason's Objections To The Constitution
George Mason’s “Objections to the Constitution” was published in October. His assertions reached every state, and Anti-Federalists adopted Mason’s work to disagree publicly with the Constitution. Mason was believed to have claimed he would rather cut off his hand than endorse the Constitution. He argued against the absence of a bill of rights and was convinced the House of Representatives was too limited to represent the citizens appropriately, the Senate obtained too much authority, the federal judiciary would damage the state judiciaries, and finally the president would be the tool in the hands of his advisers or of the Senate. Moreover, Mason had been aghast that the Convention permitted the slave trade to remain until 1808. He also was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Creating the new Constitution would bind the states into one alliance and allow the country to run smoothly. Hamilton thoughtfully accepts the notion of the government allowing the states running themselves is not foolish. However, the states would be “depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties”(8), and only take laws created by the national government as “mere recommendations” and “disregard at their option” (8). The states selfishness about their own well being and not considering that of the nation is a clear factor that the power of executing in a correct manner as a union is important for the future of the country in order for us not to fall under an anarchy. Furthermore, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation increased overtime causing there to be numerous issues.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A newly developed constitution brought upon adverse opinions as to its “new republic form being as enshrined” as well as it being a “danger”. Both oppositional and approval views were discussed within Madison Federalist No. 10 and Patrick Henry’s Speech against Ratification.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Was 9/11 Important

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Roche presents in his essay, the talent apparent in the constitutionalist that met in Philadelphia was superior amongst other groups, which Roche concludes as an advantage. The fundamental need for an ardent group has been a key component of the formation of the United States, acting as the composers of the prosperous future. Roche may consider this formation an advantage due to the authenticity presented, as their reluctance to divert “original” ambitions to pursue an unpremeditated approach of government (Roche 15). The ascendancy they asserted was within reason as the conditions under the Articles and in 1787 presented the need for a convention, likewise promoting the ratification of the Constitution. Of the defects presented in the time…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Mason was an American political leader and planter. Mason was born on December 11, 1725, on his family’s plantation in Fairfax County, Virginia (Rutland). Nearly a decade after his father’s death, he inherited the estate on which he was born (Dreisbach 40). At an early age Mason was tutored by his mother and Scottish schoolmasters, where he showed his interest as a planter, businessman, and thinker (Rutland). Mason married Ann Eilbeck of Maryland in 1750.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his idea that the United States is too large to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created in order to unite a new country. Also, when passing the Embargo Act, Jefferson demonstrates the federal power over the people, which goes against his Republican belief of allowing the states to have more power. As Madison prepares for his term in office, the citizens of the United States were most likely expecting him to be more open to suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, during a speech by Daniel Webster, a Federalist speaking on behalf of the entire Federalist Party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as his party would have preferred him to be. Both Madison and Jefferson are guilty of frequently going against the general ideas of their parties in order to meet their needs at a certain time.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Starting in August 1774 and trailing all the way to July 1776, Virginia held five Revolutionary Conventions. During these conventions the members formed the Virginia Committee of Safety that governed Virginia between August 1775 and July 1776, organized economic trades of British goods, elected members to Congress, etc. On May 15, 1776, after deciding to declare Virginia independent of Great Britain, at the fifth and final Revolutionary convention of Virginia, the members voted unanimously to prepare a constitution and a statement of laws for Virginia. George Mason was the thirty-second member of the drafting committee and he eventually took over as the man making all of the decisions. Edmund Pendleton, the president of the convention, noted,…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitutional Convention took place in May 1787. Delegates from all of the states except for Rhode Island met in the Philadelphia State House in the exact room that 11 years ago, the Declaration of Independence was signed. There were 55 delegates and most of them were lawyers, merchants, or planters, making them rich and educated men. The Constitutional Convention occurred because many of America’s leaders had become unsatisfied at that time with the government structure by which the Articles of Confederation created. George Mason was chosen to be one of Virginia’s delegates because he had much experience with the government.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philanthropos, the anonymous author of Antifederalist No. 7, wastes no time in making his argument against the ratification of the Constitution. His main argument is that the adoption of the Constitution, as it stood at the time before ratification, would lead to a civil war. He claims that “the time in which the constitution or government of a nation undergoes any particular change, is always interesting and critical.” As a result of this statement, the author goes on to argue that adopting the new Constitution will cause instability and unrest among the people, ultimately resulting in war. Philanthropos uses dramatic language and exaggerated claims in order to get his point across. An example of this comes when he states: “Were they mine enemies, the worst imprecation I…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlike some of the state legislatures that wrote and voted on their constitutions, the US Constitution was to be ratified by special state constitutional conventions. This virtually made it impossible for Congress to change the Constitution on an impulse or to even abolish it, leaving no room for “democratic despotism”. It also placed sovereignty with the people and not with governmental institutions. This very important principle of sovereignty was carried over from the revolution but seemingly got lost in some of the states’ legislatures. The Constitution considered the people to be the supreme authority. The Federalists were arguing that “sovereignty remained always with the people and government was only a temporary and limited agency of the people.” This principle was made even clearer by the opening words of the Constitution: “We the People of the United States”, leaving no doubt as to where sovereignty rested, and considering the people the “only source of just authority.” With the debate of sovereignty finally put to rest the Constitution was ratified, strengthening the union of thirteen states by embodying republican…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1700s, there was a surplus of arguments supporting or fighting against ratifying the Constitution. Ratification of the Constitution is not what's best for U.S citizens because although the Bill of Rights was proved to be successful, the insecurity of rights amongst the people, as well as the massive amount of influence that the people of power had; this will not lead to a successful nation. Documents three points out many major holes in the ratification of the Constitution such as insecurity in rights. Document four gives a supporting view as to why the United States should ratify the Constitution, it discusses how Massachusetts solved one problem, the insecurity of rights. Document five points out the people’s fear in the…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most significant being its lack of a Bill of Rights. This is an example of how material interests outweigh ideologies of the delegates. The new system of government was drastically different from the former, it was given significantly more power and took key powers away from the state governments in order to create a more strengthened federal system. The people concerned that this new Constitution would enable the government to infringe on these rights without any consideration. The lack of a bill of rights in the Constitution was one of the key reasons why George Mason refused to sign the Constitution, he wrote, “ The Declarations of Rights in the separate States are no security ……

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Document 1 the author says, “Let us look and [see] the [problems that exist] in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers . . . the complaints of every class of [people who loan money] . . . the [sad] faces of our working people . . . our ships rotting in our harbors . . . the insults that are [made against America] in every court in Europe”. The author who was a supporter of the Constitution being ratified talks about how many problems that the United States has under the current Constitution and he feels that the only way the problems can be solved is too ratify the Constitution. George Washington feels that people thought that they knew too much about how a confederation works when the first…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays