Preview

Failure Of The Constitution In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1237 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Failure Of The Constitution In The United States
Writing the United States Constitution was a very long very hard process. They needed a new constitution, they failed with the Articles of Confederation, they couldn’t stay unified in the face of a crisis like Shay’s Rebellion; every state had their own government but they needed to be unified. The problem was that everyone wanted it to be perfect, but the debates over what to include were very controversy. Not everyone could decide on one thing, with a country filled with a diverse group of people it would be hard to all agree on one thing. One of the problems in writing a constitution was that everyone was from a different political party. There were complaints formed at the time, that the minority was being ignored and being treated less …show more content…
The problem was that some people preferred a more central government and some favored more state governments. Colonists wanted to make sure their natural human rights were preserved by the constitution and couldn’t be abused again, like Britain’s king abused their rights. Some others believed that the bill of rights should include state powers, so the individual states could have some control over their laws. However, there was some people who didn’t want a bill of rights because they deemed it superfluous or unnecessary. “A fifth is of opinion that a bill of rights of any sort would be superfluous and misplaced, and that the plan would be unexceptionable but for the fatal power of regulating the times and places of election” (doc C). Some of the colonists saw that it was a necessary evil to take away the state governments that were under the Articles of Confederation. Under that old constitution, states controlled everything and nothing was unified, and the country couldn’t face a crisis, so it was time for a change. (doc D) They believed that it would lead to a crisis because forcing change is difficult on some more than others, and some don’t like the idea of being ruled under one leader. The colonists think that it will be a dreadful and problematic task but it is worth it because the government needs to be unified as a whole to stand …show more content…
The federalists were happy that there was a federal government and that they were unified, and the anti-federalists were happy that they had their own individual rights and a checks and balance system to keep corruption from occurring in the government. Everyone has their own opinion, America is very diverse today and it was diverse in beliefs back then, so it was extremely hard for all of the colonists to stick together, without hurting one another, and form a unified country with a constitution that kept it all together, they were very patient, they had to be it was their ‘perfect’ government. Everyone wanted the perfect constitution because they wanted to prevent anything from happening that happened with their old king. The constitution had to be settled on, so both sides got some of their ideas put in, but both also had to give up some things to finally come together on a government, because the last one (Articles of Confederation) wasn’t working and the country wasn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Their was way too much power in the constitution. It had to be divided. The first one it was divided into was federalism, which…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Colonists wanted to explain the rights that they believed all Colonists and Slaves deserved. The Colonists wanted to be represented and have help with their needs. Along with representation they wanted a set government. They wanted a successful government that will run the colonists accordingly. Doing this would mean that there had to be a supreme legislative and a supreme executive power within the commonwealth.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist believed that there should be a strong, central government in order to maintain domestic security and liberty. The federalist wanted the constitution to be ratified. The Anti-Federalists wanted to bar the constitution that was drafted from being ratified. They felt that this gave the government too much power. They argued that the drafters were all part of the colonial Aristocracy, and therefore, could not and would not stand for the common good of the nation, but would instead be overbearing, and hostile to the common people.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ϖ Why would the founding fathers want to replace the Articles of Confederation with a federal republic? Why would this not lead to tyranny? Prior to the American Revolutionary War, the colonists were longed for their freedom. They accepted their challenge to demand the natural rights and liberties of a mankind even though they had to give up their lives.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists where two political parties during the 1700s and early 1800s. “The supporters of the new Constitution immediately adopted the name Federalists to describe themselves. Their opponent had to contend themselves with the negative label Anti-Federalist”(Faragher 180). The Federalist believed in a strong federal government that would over see the country for the most part, where the Anti-Federalist believed that the states should have more power and not have a great influence from the federal government. The Federalist won is most part because of the people that lived in these Anti-Federalist states wanting to adopted the constitution.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlike some of the state legislatures that wrote and voted on their constitutions, the US Constitution was to be ratified by special state constitutional conventions. This virtually made it impossible for Congress to change the Constitution on an impulse or to even abolish it, leaving no room for “democratic despotism”. It also placed sovereignty with the people and not with governmental institutions. This very important principle of sovereignty was carried over from the revolution but seemingly got lost in some of the states’ legislatures. The Constitution considered the people to be the supreme authority. The Federalists were arguing that “sovereignty remained always with the people and government was only a temporary and limited agency of the people.” This principle was made even clearer by the opening words of the Constitution: “We the People of the United States”, leaving no doubt as to where sovereignty rested, and considering the people the “only source of just authority.” With the debate of sovereignty finally put to rest the Constitution was ratified, strengthening the union of thirteen states by embodying republican…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S constitution was Americas founding document as it set up there key principles of freedom and democracy. When the founding fathers drew up the constitution their intention was that it would last the course of the U.S history. Many people firmly hold the view that U.S constitution does still work very well today as it restrains the power of government, it is highly adaptable for changing time and allowing power and rights to the states while still allowing the federal government to efficient and productive. However many people believe the U.S constitution has failed as it as many outdated amendments such as the 2nd amendment the right to bear arms. Also many Liberal Democrats argue that it leads to political gridlock much too often. Also on the other side of the coin many Republicans argue that it gives way too much power to government as judicial review for example is in the hands of just 9 Supreme Court justices.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Constitution was drafted by exceptional men with divine help from Heavenly Father, people of all ages have interpreted the language of the Constitution differently than others. This difficulty caused many different groups to form their own opinion on what they thought the Constitution was saying. This was especially evident when our country was first formed and during the Civil War. It all started with the Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist campaign in the 1790’s.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalists

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To say the least, the Articles of Confederation were a highly inefficient means to running the country. Many ask why while the answer to that question lies within the nature of man himself. Yes, the Revolution occurred in response to the repressive temperament of the British rulers and the desire for individual freedoms. It was followed by total control of the government by the masses of peoples who, by nature, were unfit to rule…or were they? While it was blatantly obvious the current system of government was a little too democratic, the constitutional structure, which developed thereafter, was the cause of various tribulations that diverged the nation. Who should rule? How should they rule? What should their economic, political and ethical plans and goals consist of? All of these questions rocked the nation at the time and led to the…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forming this new country was a tough process. There were several different ideas. After realizing that the country was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came a new idea; which was to ratify the Constitution. The procedures for ratifying the new Constitution were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with that changed how people thought, building up confidence that human reasoning can solve matters instead of force or use of the government. More secular outlook emerged out of the bloom so western society finds other ways to figure out solution from a non-religious perspective, this is where individuals became and felt more important instead of just the state. Based on this, (Doc. B) states that there’s basic scheme how the English colonies in the North parts of America (the nine areas named Rhode Island, Boston, Connecticut, New Jerseys, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and Carolinas); it seemed useful enough to become a “universal concurrence”; The cooperation that is leading the colonies are devised heavily towards public peace and tranquility. So when it comes to having at least a small government at bay for each northern region, each would have two appointed representatives or deputies who are qualified for an experience for sobriety, sense, and substance; a discussion of a possible congress may have taken into consideration. Building a government means that people and their business will be heard; most likely a democratic development was thought out from the start, so the people can get their options expanded. Being able to switch provinces, gain justices, and more influential ways to support the union and safety of the colony against enemy of Great Britain. An “Impact of Enlightenment” (Chapter four lecture) featured a glorious revolution which results in an English bill of rights that gives some benefits to the people and limitation for the government. For the people, which are given the right to bear arms, freedom of speech, habeas corpus, and excessive bail; as for the ones governing, they are given a standing army and aren’t allowed to give taxation by royal prerogative. Now what pressures the colonies from having a government that would diverge from Great Britain would be…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus came many debates and questions about the central government. In Document C, Thomas Paine explains that man cannot live without a government. We are always in need of some security, even if we hate the government we still follow the laws since they protect us. Since the separation from Parliament they could finally self-govern themselves as Americans which the Continental congress decided it’d be a good idea to set up a national government. From there the Articles of Confederation were created which established the roles of the national government. The Articles of Confederation limited the rights of states to form their own policies which the states ignored since Congress did not have much authority over the states. Adding on to the fuel, the Treaty of Paris stated that even if the colonies are separated from Great Britain they…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the forming of the nation took place right after a war, many decisions had to be made carefully to make the nation perfect. When trying to form a nation, there will always be plenty of challenges along the way that are like the ones America dealt with. One of the problems America faced while trying to build a new nation was trying to build the new constitution. The states were…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of rights put limitations on the new federal government, but had no restrictions for the “States”. Like the Second Amendment, for example, and how it protected the local militias, and the majority of the other amendments protected the local juries. If you read closely, you will see that the phrase “the people” was stated the most in the majority of the amendments, showing true to the famous words “We the People,” and stating again the fact of Constitutions main goal of popular…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the revolution one of the many principles created for the new government was put into the Declaration of Independec. "men are created equal...that to secure these rights, the goverments are instituted among men, dervin their just powers from the consent of the governed,- that whenever any form of government becomes detructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter of abolish it" doc 2 this shows that the power of the govenrment to be destroyed was given to the people and all people were created this is was just one of the ways that the government wanted to show that the goverment wouldnt become dictarial along with the Bill of rights to the constituion. The reason for this was that the idea of having a strong governemt wasn't accepted by all and was debatable. This goes to show that the united states governmet did try to…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays