Preview

Arguments Against Anti-Federalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Anti-Federalism
In Founding a Nation 1783-1791, the authors claim to mostly agree on inhabitants seeking to acquire “actual settlements” rather than “vacant lands” (VOF, pg. 123). Vacant lands meant property over lands not taken for granted. Landlord companies monopolized the dispersal of lands from the West. Private organizations took custody of distributing land among new incoming colonizers by lobbying the government. Some colonists immigrate across to Ohio over the Appalachian Mountains due to poverty and the War of Independence. Ohio inhabitants relied under government protection and obeyed the laws form by the legislative branch. In 1785, a group of Ohio residents were invaded by governmental officials. Orders from the government, the men in charged …show more content…
Anti-federalists believed in the new constitution obtaining such power can lead to infringement of civil rights by wealthy Americans. For instance, wealthy Americans lobbying the government for certain laws to pass against the middle and lower class. Even though Henry failed to convince the government to reject the new constitution, Henry opened the eyes of Federalists. According to Patrick Henry, “They not foresee latent consequences: I dread the operation of it on the middling and lower class of people: It is for them I fear the adoption of this system” (VOF, pg. 129). Indeed, in the nineteenth century middle and lower class outnumbered the wealthy class of people. It was rare for anyone to attend college during that era. The predicament of lower class would encounter more uncivilized laws of not being capable to understand the enactments. Henry feared of war occurring between the Americans because not everyone would agree among the same common good …show more content…
Henry acknowledged of no need for a strong government that removed away the general government’s power. Patrick Henry demonstrated for a strong centralized government, it required “liberty is it direct end and foundation” like how Great Britain established “liberty as the foundation of everything” (VOF, pg. 128). Henry stated, “the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of consolidate” (VOF, pg. 128) on which the government can thrive into a dangerous and powerful “monarchy.” Consequently, the government ought to the rights to legislate, change private contracts, and obtain arms to defend itself. Henry beliefs of a consolidated government would cause chaos between state government and Americans. Americans would disagree of a strict republican government and federalists taxing on poor people. State governments would soon dominate over the general

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry viewed the new constitution with an opposition in which he believed that it gave too much power to the central government at the expense of the state governments. His fear, and great anti-federalist views were rooted in his assumption that in the long term, officials wound inevitably misappropriate and abuse the power granted to them. “Did we not know of the fallibility of human nature,” he told the Richmond delegates, “we might rely on…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The government would not get a lot of taxes. There would be no armies. The states would still be too strong. Each state would have different money. There would still be only on the house.”…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They were the people who opposed the new constitution. They were afraid of a stronger government.Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though both the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Constitution makers were aristocratic and wanted a government removed from the masses, their political philosophies differed greatly. Jefferson’s thinking was very progressive for his time in…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American federalism offers a solution to fears that the people will only be ruled by majorities from different regions that contained different interests and values. In the past America was run by the Articles of Confederation but it was not strong enough to hold the nation together. Under the loose Articles of Confederation, the national and state government was unable to maintain order. After the Revolution, Americans mounted debt from purchasing goods from other countries. To solve this problem the states would tax their citizens and this caused many people to go into bankruptcy. When Shay’s Rebellion happened people started realizing that by having a less powerful national government, it created many problems within the states and it also demonstrated the importance to maintain domestic order. The framers of the constitution created a federal government that replaced the weak confederation with a more powerful national government.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Patrick Henry’s speeches, we see the opposition to more government power. He speaks his points with real concern for the people of America. He says his main objection to the new government is that “it does not leave us the means of defending our rights, or of waging war against…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They guaranteed that the Federal government would dependably perform the will of the general population. On the other hand, Jefferson would not bargain and demanded lecturing his old fashioned fear inspired notions. Jefferson even went so far as to say, "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories." Unfortunately, this troubled rationality did not work extremely well for the American individuals by any stretch of the imagination; it supported the improvement of groups, a clear irreconcilable situation, and no place for trade off. Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. The Democratic Republicans indicated on numerous occasions that they were most adroit at bringing about inward strife as opposed to fathoming anything. Plainly Jefferson's uncompromising and accusatory rationalities just served to separation Americans, open up interstate clashes, and harm the quality of the United…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of creating political parties were highly contested and opposed by President George Washington. In Washington’s Farewell Address he advised the government of, “the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party” in which he believed that dividing the government would cause grave problems for the nation’s success. Regardless, through the creation of the U.S. Constitution, two distinct political parties formed: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The formation of opposing parties led to the first evidence of a divided nation, resulting in controversy between political powers such as Alexander Hamilton (Federalist) and Thomas Jefferson (Anti-Federalist). This divide in political power created a sense of sectionalism rather than nationalism,…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Anti-Federalists believed that mankind always seeks freedom and a social contract between the person and the state or the government to protect safety and rights such as happiness, self-defense and unalienable. Anti-Federalists also believed states declaration of rights is not enough and that these rights are so essential to life such as life, liberty and property that we can’t even risk losing it. After all it was seen necessary to specifically have Bill of Rights as the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep our…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the U.S. Constitution being the longest written constitution throughout the whole world's history, there were many debates and arguments against it prior to its indoctrination (Wallace, 2015). Anti-Federalist mainly preferred small government tactics of the Democratic-Republic (Schultz, 2016). In contrast, the Federalist believed that its current government was too weak to enforce its laws under the Articles of Confederation (Wallace, 2015). In return, this brought about the Federalist fight for a stronger central government. Also, Federalist wanted to develop a first-class industrialist country that distributed throughout the whole world to other economies (Schultz, 2016). Federalist argued that a large, diverse, and populated country…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays