In Patrick Henry’s speeches, we see the opposition to more government power. He speaks his points with real concern for the people of America. He says his main objection to the new government is that “it does not leave us the means of defending our rights, or of waging war against …show more content…
tyrants…” because “…gentlemen cannot be earnest.” He argues against the factions that Madison spoke of and asks “Where is that danger?” speaking of the factions that Madison was sure were going to come about. He is concerned about the liberty that they were seeking and any opposition to it “Our glorious forefathers of Great Britain made liberty the foundation of everything.” One last thing he says that stands out to me is “Your President may easily become King.” This is what he is really scared of, a King, a monarchy being established and them going back to square one.
What this revealed about Madison was that he thought people would be capable of rebellion and more government was needed to make sure that didn’t happen.
Thinking of today’s society, it seems he was right to an extent. No rebellion has been able to overthrow the government and that’s because of the measure we have taken as a society to make sure something like that didn’t happen. What this revealed to me about Patrick Henry was that he thought more government would infringe on their liberty that they came to America for. These points made by both are difficult to not agree with both because I agree with both gentlemen here. We need government to make sure the country doesn’t fall apart but we don’t need the government trying to control our every move and
decisions.