Preview

Examples Of Compromises After The Civil War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Compromises After The Civil War
After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address
    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address

    The bloodiest war in American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis for the south, both presidents, but two different sides. Both garner for peace, yet one is willing to start a war, while the other is willing to accept it. This essay will compare and contrast the political, economical, and social outlooks on Lincoln’s and Davis’ Inaugural addresses throughout the civil war between the North and South. Slavery, laws, and state rights drove the South to start a war, and Lincoln received the war with open arms. Both sides wanted peace, but their means of achieving it and their leaders’ choices and beliefs differed greatly while still holding similarities.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lincoln's First Inaugural Address Inevitable
    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Lincoln's First Inaugural Address Inevitable

    Conflict between the North and South was inevitable by the time Lincoln gave his first inaugural address because several Southern states had seceded from the union and because Lincoln would not have maintained the status quo for long. For a good two decades, the United States had been experiencing more and more turmoil over slavery. The Republican North was emphatically against slavery, viewing it as an evil abomination, while the Democratic South viewed it as integral to the Southern tradition. Northerners bannered together in the name of justice, while Southerners rallied to preserve their way of life. Feeling that their entire culture was gravely threatened, Southerners became more and more organized and militant, culminating in South Carolina’s secession from the United States of America on December 20, 1860.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Was Slavery the Cause of the American Civil War? Essay Example
    • 4190 Words
    • 17 Pages

    To What Extent Was Slavery the Cause of the American Civil War? Essay Example

    In his second inaugural address in March 1865, Abraham Lincoln looked back at the beginning of the Civil War four years earlier "all knew," he said, that slavery "was somehow the cause of the war." This essay will endeavour to discuss the role of long term divisions caused by the slavery debate in the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. In doing so this analysis will encompass the period between the birth of the nation beginning with the start of the American Revolution in 1763 and the conclusion of the Civil War in 1865. This being a period in which the newly independent nation struggled with its state system, with each of the former colonies possessing the rights to a significant level of self-governance that inevitably led to disagreements and conflicts of interest. One such conflict was the disagreement over slavery which James Ford, like Lincoln, believes was crucial in creating a clear North-South divide that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Whilst recognising slavery’s overwhelming contribution to the outbreak of the American civil war in 1861, one must acknowledge alternative factors beyond slavery, which contributed to the nations descent towards armed conflict. Revisionists such as William Gienapp and William Freehling emphasise the political contribution to the outbreak of the war and the influence of sectional ideology on ante bellum politics. It was this differing ideology that created the tensions between Southern and Northern parties creating political chaos during the 1850s, the North believing they were attempting to save democracy whilst the South campaigned for increased States’ rights, all of which provoked the outbreak of war. As well as the long-term divisions over slavery and the short term political contributions to the outbreak of war, historians such as Charles and Mary Beard placed emphasis on the…

    • 4190 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In What Ways Did The Constitution Struggle To Settle The Conflict Over Federal And State Power Prior To The Civil War Analysis
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In What Ways Did The Constitution Struggle To Settle The Conflict Over Federal And State Power Prior To The Civil War Analysis

    The United States encountered many difficulties prior to the Civil War. As the years went through, it was clear that the Constitution’s laws would not solve many of the issues left on the decisions of the heads of the state. Constitutional amendments were subjected to free interpretation and manipulation and several difficulties remained to be solved, making the threat of a war real and imminent. The Civil War of 1861 became, in fact, a terrible reality, due to religious issues and sectional power struggles.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    Often people will argue that American politicians did little in the way of trying to avoid Civil war. After all, both Northern and Southern politicians were only trying to benefit their sides which ultimately led to each of the compromises failures. The Missouri compromise inevitably failed because of the main issue of the South’s demands to bring slavery into the western territories. The Compromise of 1850 failed because of opposition from anti-slavery Whigs and pro-slavery democrats, who couldn’t agree on a majority vote for any of Henry Clays compromises. The Kansas-Nebraska Act ended in failure because it failed it end the national conflict over slavery.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    President Abraham Lincoln did not believe that the south could legally secede from union because the states could not get rid of a government they made without collapsing anarchy. Lincoln called the Union a “contract” (Lincoln 2) between the states and the contract could not be dissolved without the consent of all the states. Since the North did not believe the southern slave states had ample reason to secede, all the states were not in accord, so the “contract” (Lincoln 2) was still valid. If the legal matter was not reason enough against secession, the resulting anarchy from a new government should have been a deterrent. The federal government was not able to please everyone, but no government would be able to please everyone. If the new southern government could form on basis of pleasing everyone, it would dissolve into chaos. The new government would be mob rule and it would encourage other factions to break off from the union if they became dissatisfied. It would plunge both countries into a mad power scramble and it could not be allowed even if it was legal, which it was…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle

    According to the former New York Senator William Seward, the American Civil War arose as a consequence of irrepressible conflict between opposing forces. He believed that had there been a compromise between these forces then the nation could have avoided the war. The paper agrees with the senator's views and takes the perceptive that these opposing forces and not just the failure to compromise by politicians were the origins of the war. Politicians could only have achieved so much, but these opposing forces held a stronger bargaining power than the politicians. The paper discusses these forces and concludes by offering a compromise that could have forestalled the war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why The Although The South Won The Civil War
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why The Although The South Won The Civil War

    This observation although valid in some respects, is also a very broad generalization and is by no means without its flaws. This paper will examine not only the validity of this observation, but also its errors. There is no debate that militarily the Northern states won the civil war, however an argument can be made that the south did “win” the peace. Immediately following Lincolns assassination Andrew Johnson would announce his plan to “pardon most, but not all former rebels…return all confiscated and abandoned land to ex confederates, even if it were in the hands of freedmen.”…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Tragic Changes In American Politics After The Civil War
    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Tragic Changes In American Politics After The Civil War

    The Civil War was one of the most tragic wars in American history. The nation was so divided leading up to the Civil War because when Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas joined the Confederacy while Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri stayed in the Union, President Abraham Lincoln became determined to preserve the Union. After the war, the nations reunited and the southern states were not allowed to secede, were placed under military rule, and had to apply for readmission to the Union. The war impacted American politics by starting the Radical Reconstruction, the plan to rebuild America after the Civil War. The war changed American society when slavery effectively ended. After slaves became legally free, African Americans…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Gettysburg Address During The Civil War
    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Gettysburg Address During The Civil War

    These two differing thoughts caused Americans to rage and compromises to be thrown out the window. All that was required was one final spark to set off the flame that would be known as the Civil War. A new candidate was running for president, and the southern states didn’t like him. They swore that if the new candidate were to get elected, they would secede from the union. The candidate won, and they held their ideals, they left.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism In The Civil War
    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalism In The Civil War

    Some portion of the debate that prompted the Civil War (1861– 1865) concerned federalism. Numerous Southerners felt that state governments alone had the power to settle on important choices, for example, whether slavery ought to be legal. Advocates of states' rights supported the individual state governments had the ;supreme law' the central government in light of the fact that the states had created the federal government through the ratification of the Constitution. Most Southern states ended up seceding from the Union since they felt that withdrawal was the best way to secure their rights. Abraham Lincoln and numerous Northerners held that the Union together; their triumph confirmed the national government's right to have control over the…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fate of Their Country

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More