Preview

United States v Salerno

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
United States v Salerno
Case Study: United States v. Salerno 481 U.S. 739 (1987)

Using your text and the internet, in narrative format with a minimum of 500 words, outline the case of United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987). Give the facts, issue, and court holding of the case.

In the case of United States v. Salerno, Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno was arrested on charges of numerous RICO violations, and detained without bail. This case determined that the Bail Reform Act of 1984 did not violated the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment nor the Excessive Bail clause of the Eighth Amendment. Salerno was indicted on 35 violations of the Racketeering, Influence and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) act that included mail and wire fraud, criminal gambling violations and extortion. It was also determined that Salerno was the boss of the la cosa nostra crime family. After this discovery, the government concluded that there were no provisions that would ensure the safety of the community. Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, the government asked that Salerno be detained until his trial. The request for his detainment was granted on the trial court level. Salerno challenged this decision based on the premise that he was detained without bail. However, the Second Circuit Court of appeals found that Salerno’s pretrial detainment on the grounds of future dangerous behaviors violated his civil liberties. After this decision was made, the government appealed.

The primary issue in this case is whether or not pre-trial detention of a potentially dangerous suspect is punitive making it an unconstitutional deprivation of liberty without due process of the law. The Supreme Court held that the detention of a potentially dangerous suspect is regulatory. Additionally, it was held that when there is sufficient compelling interest, the detention of a dangerous suspect can be justified due to the pending threat the person may cause to society as a result of their release. However, there was dissent in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim, affirming that the County's routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment. By and large, arraignments must be held inside forty-eight hours of arrest. Notwithstanding, weekends and holidays were excluded as days. However, an individuals who was arrested on a Friday could spend up to a week in jail before arraignment…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Pelican Bay State Prison inmate, Jesse Perez, was recently awarded $25,000 in damages in reference to a case filed against correctional officers that were accused of acting in violation of the prisoner’s First Amendment rights. Perez was identified by officers at another prison as a member of the Mexican Mafia. After he was identified in 2005, Perez was transferred to Pelican Bay’s Security Housing Unit. The lawsuit was filed against the officers who claimed they identified him as a member of the Mexican Mafia. Perez claims that their determination and decision to reassign him was a violation of his rights by way of the constitution.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Us V. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Restaurant challenged use by the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) of aggregate method to determine, assess, and collect its share of Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes on tips received by its employees. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 21 F.Supp.2d 1097, granted summary judgment for restaurant, and IRS appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 242 F.3d 844, affirmed, and certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court, Justice Breyer, held that: (1) the law authorized the IRS to base its assessment upon its aggregate estimate of all the tips that the restaurant 's customers paid its employees; (2) such a method is not precluded by negative implication from statutes which authorize the IRS to use methods of estimation for determining income tax liability and which authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to adopt regulations that prescribe mechanisms for employers to adjust FICA tax liability; (3) fact that an aggregate estimate will sometimes include tips that should not count in calculating the FICA tax the employer owes did not render use of that method unreasonable; (4) regulation which says that an employer, when calculating its FICA…

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, during the time Martin was in pretrial detention, his attorneys filed a class action on behalf of all youths subject to preventative detention in New York, charging that this form of detention was violating their due-process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. His appeal was upheld because, at adjudication, most delinquents are released or placed on probation, not many of then were detained. So the appellate judge thought it was unfair to incarcerate them before trial. The prosecution brought the case to the U.S. Supreme Court for final judgment.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Nsl

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. Summarize the Supreme Court’s changing interpretations of how to protect both the due process rights of accused criminals and to preserve the safety of the community.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal justice system realizes that inmates do have some rights, however it is also recognized that those inmates do have less rights than free citizens. Taking away some rights of the inmates is a valid punishment and by restricting these rights it helps in maintaining security in prisons. The title of the case that I chose was Wolff v. McDonnell. This case was very important because it uniformed certain rights and freedoms within correctional facilities. “Although inmates received some procedural safe-guards to protect them against the notorious abuses of disciplinary meetings, they did not receive all the due- process rights of a criminal trial” (Clemens, 2002). Nor did the Court question the right of correctional officials to revoke the good time of inmates. In this case, “Robert O. McDonnell, a prisoner, had filed a class- action suit against the state of Nebraska, claiming that its disciplinary procedures, especially those pertaining to the loss of good time were unconstitutional” (Clemens, 2002). McDonnell also complained, along with other inmates, about the limitations on their access to the law library, legal services, and visitation with the inmate legal assistant and that the regulations regarding prisoners ' mail violated the attorney-client privilege” (Keenan, 2005). This case was argued on Argued April 22, 1974 and a decision was made on decided June 26, 1974.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The contest of strength between the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model is similar to attempting to satisfy every person, each and every second and no one some of the time. Debates are good for both models, but for all growth on one side, there must be one on the opposing side as well. The Crime Control Model, prosecutor or the police, is not in favor for the Due Process Model, a person, to have more rights than they do. Each and every individual who is a United States citizen should know what his or her rights are.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inbau, F.E. (1999). More about public safety v. individual civil liberties. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Chicago: Summer 1999. Vol. 89, ISS. 4, pg 1421, 7 pgs. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from Axia College of the University of Phoenix Library ProQuest database website http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/pqdweb?index=7&did=51287736&SrchMode=1&sid=2&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1226629166&clientId=13118…

    • 2544 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    III. The History of the case being appealed to the Supreme Court and the decisions of the lower courts…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life and the End

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Find a case that dealt with a writ of habeas corpus, briefly relate the facts of the case, and explain how a writ of habeas corpus was an issue in the case.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Outline

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When a person is interrogated it means they are taken into custody and await trial, arraignment, and facing a judge to determine their punishment and enter their plea. In the future of most criminals they are looking at a sentence to serve for the punishment of the law they broke, or crime they committed. These sentences have specific and general deterrence as well as guidelines that the constitution says we must follow. The federal sentencing guidelines are the most controversial and most complex of all the sentencing reform efforts. (Rubuck, 2001).…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used to provide civil rights for individuals and restricts powers of the local and federal government (Lynch 1).…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pretrial Detention

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Klein, J.D. (1997). The Pretrial Detention “Crisis”: The causes and the cure. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 52, 280-305.…

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays