Universal Healthcare Argument Analysis

The debate goes on about whether universal healthcare should be established or not, but in the editorials the

authors argue and make valid points about the statement, "Should universal healthcare be established.". As the

debate goes on determining if the healthcare program should be existent or non-existent in America, the author's

use valid points such as statistical data, logical statements, and appeal to the readers emotions. Universal

healthcare would benefit many Americans and it could help avoid early deaths because there are too many people

suffering from lack of care from a professional.

In the first editorial the author argues how universal healthcare can bring down costs and increase access to care.

This argument
Not

only did the author use pathos in their argument, but they used logical reasoning such as "Healthcare can lower costs and

increase access to care.".The author strongly supports their claim by using such strong evidence and appealing their readers

in such ways.

In many ways the author in the second editorial had come to believe and argue that universal healthcare is too

expensive and would reduce the quality of care for people. In this argument the author makes a point about how healthcare

is too expensive by providing a logical statement, such as, taxes will go up which will result in people unwillingly having to

pay more taxes. On the other hand, this author also appeals to readers emotion by stating "Healthcare will reduce the quality

of care.", instantly this statement makes people believe that they will not be receiving top care. As the author pleads to the

readers, they also make the argument realistic and persuading. Healthcare in this authors eyes is not necessary and the

system now should stay the way it is currently.

Although the editorials bear some superficial similarities, the differences between the two