Preview

Utilitarian vs Retributive

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarian vs Retributive
Darwing Silva 706694

Utilitarian and retributive theory of punishment
Utilitarian Theorists believe that punishment should be developed based on what is best for the public as a whole. Utilitarian theorists are forward looking as opposed to retribution theorists. The goal of utilitarian theorists is to prevent a crime from happening again. In a general sense this means that the punishment for a certain crime needs to be great than the possible reward for committing the crime. A utilitarian theorist believes that if this appropriate level of punishment is met, most individuals will be deterred from committing the crime.
Kant objects to the utilitarian approach as he claims it is practical and political. Kant believes the punishment must fit the crime and punishment itself when carried out accordingly and just, punishment is not evil. Kant’s moral theory is not especially preoccupied with punishment, and should not be thought of as primarily a theory of punishment. The reason for considering punishment at such length here is that in doing so, we can come to a better understanding of what Kant thought, and how he dissented from the utilitarian view, on the subjects of the moral importance of individuals’ well-being and what it means to treat someone with respect
Utilitarian Theorists believe that punishment should also be specifically tailored to the individual so that he will not commit future crimes. For example, an utilitarian theorist would believe strongly in incarcerating, or incapacitating, or even executing an individual who is likely to commit another crime The practical problem with this belief is that it is hard to identify specific individuals who will become repeat offenders. In addition, this belief may be in conflict with the idea of punishing consistently. The public believes that punishment is not consistent and therefore punishment
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4th Outlined Brigade Combat Team (ABCT)
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4th Outlined Brigade Combat Team (ABCT)

    Taking command of such a prestigious combat hardened unit, as is the 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), is truly an honor. I’m humbled at the opportunity and want to thank the outgoing command team for all that they’ve done. I believe the development of a leadership philosophy is a continuous ever changing process, comprised of life experiences and a person’s family upbringing. Although my personal leadership philosophy may change some overtime, the core aspects will remain the same.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialist And Non-Retribution Theory Essay
    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Consequentialist And Non-Retribution Theory Essay

    According to Duff and Garland, what are the central differences between ‘consequentialist’ and ‘non-consequentialist’ (often referred to as ‘retributivist’) theories of punishment?…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing Paper

    My theory for the reasoning of punishment has two main goals which are to provide justice for the victims and a lesson to the convicted. When a judge sits in preparation to initiate sentencing they have to go through numerous thought processes because of the uniqueness of every case. Considerations such as what are they trying to accomplish with the punishment and who would benefit from such a sentence. General factors like the age of the convicted and the heinousness of the crime committed matters as well. When a criminal is sentence it is reasoned by retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, or rehabilitation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis
    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical Treatment of Prisoners
    • 3191 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Ethical Treatment of Prisoners

    When there are million’s of people incarcerated throughout the United States, the ethical treatment of prisoner’s rights must be analyzed. Throughout the years many modifications have been made to accommodate inmates and preserve their basic human rights. Have we as a society done enough regarding the ethical treatment of prisoners or have we made their lives in prison too easy that it is no longer a punishment for them? There are many people in the United States who have strong feelings of what is right and wrong and fall on both sides of this question. Utilitarianism is the belief that moral rules should be choices made by a society to promote the happiness of its members (Mosser, 2010). Through the utilitarian view the argument could be made that these prisoners are being treated to good and not good enough. Utilitarianism gives an understandable, theoretical foundation for moral decision making. Prior to coming to a decision upon a course of action, the utilitarian is asked to consider its effects on the entire population over an infinite period of time (Mosser, 2010).…

    • 3191 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Paper Individual
    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sentencing Paper Individual

    The goals of both state and federal punishment are to deter other criminals from such acts and to prevent the individuals from repeating them and presenting a danger to the public. By placing rules and laws they help maintain peace and order helping to make sure that individuals within the state and the country remain safe. The object of punishment is called sentencing, and the state, and federal judges would determine depending on the crime that was committed by the offender. There are some theories on the objectives of punishment that has been the top topic on the philosopher of punishment between the administrative, and attorneys for long periods of time. Many methods of sentence have established, for each them was tests to validate the run-through some method and the state its appropriate purposes.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Treatment of Prisoners
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Treatment of Prisoners

    When there are millions of people incarcerated throughout the United States, the ethical treatment of prisoner’s rights has to be analyzed. Through the years many modifications have been made for inmates and their basic human rights. I sometimes wonder have we as a society, made their lives in prison too easy that it is no longer a punishment for them. There are many people in the United States who have strong feelings of what is right and wrong to this question. Utilitarianism is the belief that moral rules should be choices made by a society to promote the happiness of its members (Mosser, 2010). Through the eye of utilitarian, the argument could be that these prisoners are being treated to good and not good enough. Utilitarianism gives us an understandable foundation for moral decision making. Prior to coming to a decision upon a course of action, the utilitarian is asked to consider its effects on the entire population over an infinite period of time (Mosser, 2010).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies
    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophies

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Sentencing
    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Criminal Sentencing

    Historically, punishment has been the most dominant goal in criminal sentencing. Punishment, as Herbert Packer described, emphasizes the infliction of pain or suffering. In the United States, we believe punishment is necessary to maintain order and show fairness to those who do not violate the rules and laws we live by. Punishment is used on many different levels. We use it from the basics to teach children right from wrong, and we use it as a means to deal with societies most despicable offenders. Punishment in this sense also serves as retribution.…

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Criminals
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sentencing Criminals

    Sentencing is an important aspect in the criminal justice process. It is the punishment defendants receive when they are convicted of a crime. The punishment spectrum is wide and vast, ranging from probation to death. Punishment and sentencing present some of the most complex issues of the criminal justice system. There are four main philosophical reasons surrounding the purpose of sentencing; they are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. Retribution is the philosophy that a criminal's punishment shall be determined on the severity of the crime he or she committed. It should be noted that retribution is not the same thing as revenge and that the punishment does not satisfy the revenge theory to anyone who may have been a victim. The retribution philosophy also is inspired by the Old Testament, where it states "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Deterrence philosophy has two parts to it, which are the general and specific deterrence. The Deterrence philosophy is based on the fact that a criminal will realize the punishment outweighs the crime that he or she is going to commit. This philosophy hopes to prevent the criminal from going through with the criminal act. The general deterrence works this way, if the punishment is seen to outweigh the crime then others will be deterred from committing the same crime. The specific deterrence is based on the theory that a criminal, once punished and released, will not want to commit another crime and receive the same punishment. The Incapacitation philosophy believes by incarcerating criminals, this takes away the criminals liberty by placing them in jail or prison; this will ultimately keep the criminal from committing further crimes among society and reduce further criminal opportunity. Rehabilitation is another means of trying to reduce criminal activity. Rehabilitation will teach a person not to commit further criminal acts. This philosophy believes that the public is better…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Proportional Retributivism
    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is Proportional Retributivism

    “This failure of the theory to provide a basis for supporting the death penalty reveals an important gap in proportional retributivism. It shows that while the theory is general in scope, it does not yield any specific recommendations regarding punishment. It tells us that armed robbery should be punished more severely than embezzling and less severely than murder, but it does not tell us how much to punish any of these,” (Nathanson, An Eye for an Eye). By not giving us specific punishments for specific actions, but continuing on to say that the highest punishment allowed to be given is a life sentence in prison, is enough to completely dismisses the death penalty and also make itself almost unusable due to lack of clarity.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sdfsdf
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sdfsdf

    A SIMPLIFIED ACCOUNT OF KANT'S ETHICS KANT'S MORAL THEORY has acquired the reputation of being forbiddingly difficult to understand and, once understood, excessively demanding in its requirements. I don't believe that this reputation has been wholly earned, and I am going to try to undermine it. I shall try to reduce some of the' difficulties, and try to show the implications of a Kantian moral theory for action toward those who do or may suffer famine. Finally, I shall compare…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics