Utilitarianism Sentient Creatures And Humanity Analysis

Running head: UTILITARIANISM: SENTIENT CREATURES AND HUMANITY !1
Utilitarianism: Sentient Creatures and Humanity
Anonymous
University of the People
UTILITARIANISM: SENTIENT CREATURES AND HUMANITY !2
Utilitarianism: Sentient Creatures and Humanity
A virtuous humanitarian might never muse over murdering someone for flesh, a cannibalistic reason in which starvation is a consequence of hunger in isolation. Some would choose death, sacrificing individual life for collective lives. But, is self-sacrifice the ultimate character trait? Is it wise? Or, is it foolish? While the character trait of self-sacrifice may be innately the ideal, virtuous humanitarian, there are situations in which the individual chooses not to. Hence, creating a complex degree
Furthermore, it is inevitable that every species will experience pain and suffering, but animals tend to not inflict such onto themselves. It is human beings that oppress and abuse them. However, in utilitarianism, happiness means freedom, but there are criticisms that must be dependent on the situation.
UTILITARIANISM: SENTIENT CREATURES AND HUMANITY !3
Differentiating hedonism from utilitarianism allows inspection of when meat-eating is considered moralistic, ethical, or never. The belief in animal rights already suggests that hunting is like murder—there is no basis in accepting the act as fun which is a sensuality. A utilitarian vegan might argue that meat-eating is harmful to the environment which harms every species.
Considering the impacts of feeding grains and giving fresh water to livestock, the maldistribution of food and water globally, and the methane produced, it is a collective reason to choose a plantbased diet. But, there is a sense of justice that would allow meat-eating in certain circumstances.
The underprivileged might eat meat because of efficiency with poverty being a struggle.
Sometimes, it involves cultural relativism in which cultural foods sample meats. Even
Scientifically, not eating meat is healthy overall when smartly done, but there are no surging politics to defend it so far in the United
UTILITARIANISM: SENTIENT CREATURES AND HUMANITY !4
States. Unfortunately, some animal rights activists become impeding on others which removes the collective intention and becomes an individual motivation to convert lifestyles. That is possibly why many do not change, but seeking for political power on meat-eating becomes a valuable asset towards utilitarian law though would meet rejection by the norm.
If utilitarianism values collective intentions, then that foregoes individual intentions.
“Morality says that you should never treat rational human beings merely as means to your end” (Justice Harvard, n.d.), but the individual that rejects meat-eating might reject it merely because it is repulsive to recognize slaughter becomes flesh on the platter. Unlike me, I am a utilitarian if it means furthering justice and compassion upon the world. I have not become a vegan for many years because my family does the shopping for food groceries, so it would be selfish of me to impede on that. But, is it selfish if it is reasoned with protecting the