Preview

Utilitarians Arguments Against Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarians Arguments Against Euthanasia
Utilitarians have a very divided viewpoint on how situations should be approached in society. In that viewpoint there is a lot of variability from one situation to another. In this paper the topic of utilitarianism and what a utilitarian would do when placed in a situation of euthanasia is going to be discussed. With the general belief being each person has the same weight in creating happiness towards the situation what is best. Utilitarians often have to analyze many aspects to ensure they are making the correct decision.
Utilitarianism is a concept that in its most basic of explanations is the choosing of an action as a way to create the most good or least amount of sadness in any specific situation. For example in the trolley problem case
…show more content…
Now euthanasia is the painless killing of someone whom is suffering from a painful or irreversible disease and or coma. The reason that a utilitarian would not support the concept of euthanasia is because in the simple thought process that although one person is suffering from the illness that is just the pain and sadness of one person. Whereas if euthanasia was to be used then all of that person's family would be sad due to the loss of the one individual. However if the sick person had no family or no known friends the utilitarian may change his/her outlook on the situation due the the fact that there would be no one to mourn the person after they had died thus the pain of that one ill person would outweigh the pain/sadness that would be felt by that person being dead due to that person not having any family or anyone who cared about them. For a utilitarian each no two situations are the same in this example due to many outlying factors therefore each situation would have to be evaluated differently based on each situation and based on each individual factor as a way to truly measure the happiness or overall sadness that would come out of it. One main reason that each situation would have to be evaluated is how quickly this had been set in and how long the person had been dealing with the illness or been in the coma. The reason this may affect the outcome and the view of a utilitarian is because if the person had a large family and had been fighting this disease for a long time that brings another aspect of understanding into the situation. In this situation if the family knew that the person was in excruciating pain and had no way to escape the pain except through death obviously this would cause the family to be upset

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism = an ethical philosophy that says the most ethical decision or course of action is the one that maximize utility.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a paper by Peter Singer entitled, “Voluntary Euthanasia: A Utilitarian Perspective” (2003), he concludes that the “utilitarian case for allowing patients to choose euthanasia, under specified conditions and safeguards, is strong.” In the body of his paper, he discusses the different conditions and safeguards that would have to be met in order for this to be allowed in reference to utilitarianism. These conditions and safeguards include mandating palliative care specialists to attempt pain relief techniques, and requiring the patient to undergo a psychiatric evaluation to ensure they are in a mental state capable of making coherent decisions. With these conditions and safeguards in place to prevent decisions being made while in constant pain that could be relieved, or decisions being made while clinically depressed, there seems to be no reason as to why a patient shouldn’t be allowed to choose euthanasia or PAS as an end of life option if the net happiness that would result from them continuing to live is outweighed by the pain and suffering the patient would have to…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism claims that everyone shares a common intrinsic value of happiness and that because this is seen as the most important value in life, we should try to maximize…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The study of Bioethics involves the consideration of ethical issues arising from advancements in medicine and/or biology. The study of bioethics helps with determining the proper decision in regard to medical or biological issues. Bioethics is highly influential in academia, where scholars investigate the various scenarios arising from advancements, but is also influential in the applied realms of biology and medicine. Albert Jonsen, in his book Bioethics, claims "This field has established itself as an integral part of practical or applied philosophy and as a valuable adjunct to health policy and medical practice" (Jonsen 4). When dealing with the human body, ethics must be considered in order to preserve the value of human life. A highly…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were terminally ill would you want to end your life? Euthanasia comes from a Greek meaning ‘pleasant death’ this is the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering. Euthanasia can be classified in different ways. Active Euthanasia is when a person deliberately ends someone’s life, for example by injecting them with a large dose of medication such as barbiturate, paralytic, and potassium solution. Passive euthanasia is where a person causes death withholding or with drawing treatment for instance antibiotics or chemotherapy. Both Active Euthanasia and passive are illegal under the English Law. Euthanasia can be regarded as manslaughter or murder which is punishable and can have a maximum penalty up to a life imprisonment.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for ‘good death’. It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. Because of this many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering” (1). I strongly agree in legalizing euthanasia in our society, and I will be applying the ethical doctrine Utilitarianism to defend my case. Euthanasia minimizes the suffering that affects those involved. Euthanasia is already legal in Holland, Luxembourg and Belgium, and permitted in Switzerland if performed by a non-doctor. In the US, the State of Washington, Montana, and Oregon have already passed laws in support of euthanasia while a recent Gallop poll finds that the vast majority of Americans continue to support "right-to-die" laws for terminally ill patients. The following benefits to legalizing euthanasia are: patients’ are saved from unwanted suffering, free up the nurses and doctors time for savable patients, vital organs can be saved, allowing doctors to save the lives of others, and health care cost would be reduced.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If a person is legally allowed to refuse treatment that will effect their life, then why can’t a person who is suffering a great deal of pain share the same faith? Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics today, it is a painless way of killing a patient that is suffering from an incurable and painful disease or if the patient is in an irreversible coma…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We did not have the chance to decide if we wanted to come into this world, so should we be entitled the honor of deciding to leave? Is it Euthanasia, pain or glory? As the American Anthropologist and Folklorist Ruth Benedict once wrote “The trouble with life isn’t that there is no answer, it’s that there are so many answers”. American’s culture war over medical euthanasia has been in the news since 1990’s and now in the 21st century, it remains a concern. In modern America, there was a time in the history of euthanasia that witnessed crucial changes to the nation’s moral values surrounding death and dying. Before, the twentieth century, the word “Euthanasia” was translated into “good death.” This was considered the process of making dying…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason for which people consider ending their life through euthanasia is because they are terminally ill. Terminally ill patients are those who have been diagnosed with a progressive degenerative disease for which there is not a known cure. These diseases include those such as Multiple Sclerosis, AIDS, Huntington's Disease, or Alzheimer's Disease. There are three things that motivate terminally ill patients to end their life. The first reason being that they do not want to diminish their assets by incurring large medical expenses as their death approaches, and as an act of generosity they would rather die sooner, leaving their beneficiaries their assets. The second reason that one may consider euthanasia is that when they realize death is near, they wish to have total control over the process. In addition when a person relies on continuous care from another person, they feel that they have lost their independence, which can be considered as a loss of personal dignity. (www.religioustolerance.org)…

    • 510 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Someone planning a living will has a number of priorities in mind; these ”include being free of pain and psychological stress, having control over decisions about their care, avoiding treatments that prolong their deaths, and not burdening their families” (Alfonso 43). These priorities don’t change when someone is at the end of their life, but hasn’t planned ahead. Having the option of Patient Assisted Suicide will help to ease the patient’s mind that their death can be on their terms. As Rachels points out “active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia” (78). It is much more compassionate to give the patient what they want, and let them choose their own death. As Peter Singer points out in his paper, “if beings are capable of making choices, we should, other things being equal, allow them to decide whether or not their lives are worth living” (529). If we are applying the theory of Utilitarianism to the morality of active versus passive euthanasia, we must look at the consequences of the actions. In both cases, the patient ends up deceased, therefore the final consequences are the same. If a patient is terminally ill and suffering; for the purposes of this example, we will say that this will both produce the greatest good and reduce suffering, because the patient will be at peace. If the patient is given the right to choose active euthanasia, or PAS,…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some might say that euthanasia is not the moral equivalent of murder as this action only affect an individual well-being, it is often valued for its own sake, as well as necessary for pursuit of all other goods within a life. Others might argue that euthanasia is the moral equivalent of murder as every human being has a natural inclination to continue living. Both arguments contrast in helping us evaluate more about euthanasia is the moral equivalent of murder or not. For me, I think euthanasia is inherently wrong as I think this action is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. In the following part, I will define what euthanasia is and base on J. Gay- William’s The Wrongfulness of euthanasia to explain why the thought is wrong.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays