Preview

Vietnam War Leaflet Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vietnam War Leaflet Analysis
Source C: Leaflet by the Seamen’s Union of Australia

Source C is a segment of a leaflet which highlights the perspectives of three individuals from the ‘Seamen’s Union of Australia’ on the issue of cargo handling during the Vietnam War. The leaflet is an official primary produced in 1966, incorporating a mixture of images and written text by William Flint, Basil Box and Raymond King.

The perspectives of the three authors on the issue of cargo handling and the Vietnam War seem fairly clear in this source. All three writers were against cargo handling for South Vietnam and refused to take part in the process as they believed that it was simply a ‘war against women and children’. The writers agreed that their involvement was not helping
…show more content…
This source itself seems to inform people of Menzies reason for action rather than to directly persuade people to take a side. Menzies also states valid reasons for the objectives in Vietnam, covering a wide range of reasons for Australia’s involvement. Although all four aims seemed unbiased and believable, two of them (points 3 & 4) seemed to be key points for War in Vietnam. The first was to stop the spread of communism; the second was to support its allies i.e. United States and South Vietnam. Historical content also support the idea that communism was feared by many countries at the time, believing that it was a dangerous party which would do nothing but create harm to the world. Australia in particular feared communism, as being a capitalist country, the majority were not keen on following the ideas of Communists, especially the idea of being equal. Therefore, I believe that Australia’s role in Vietnam was to prevent the spread of Communism towards the south, helping Vietnam overcome Communism rule (supporting points 1&2), while also protecting itself at the same time. For Australia, supporting allies was a priority as countries like the United States have helped us in the past and maintaining a good relationship with allies is important for Australia as we are an isolated country and may need further support from them in the future. As a Prime Minister, it is crucial …show more content…
The Liberal Party, under the leadership of Robert Menzies, helped out the South Vietnam Government by predominantly providing troops and weapons, especially bombs. Menzies sent personnel and aircraft of ‘RAAF Transport Flight’ to Vietnam, as well as war ships to support the war. Military equipment at the time was extremely important as fighting in the war did not necessarily depend on one-on-one combat, but rather using bombs and aircraft to hit the areas of target more faster without sacrificing soldiers. As there were not enough Australian soldiers taking part in the war at the time, compared to the Communists, Menzies decided to introduce conscription in Australia for the war. Therefore in 1964, it was compulsory for all 20-year-old males to join the National Service under the National Service Act of 1964. The selection of conscripts was based on date of birth, and conscripts were obligated to give two years’ continuous full-time service, followed by a further three years on the active reserve list. The main objective for Australian’s involvement in the war was to stop the Communists moving further south, and taking over the world. There was a genuine fear of communism in Asia spreading to Australia. The entry of Australia into the Vietnam conflict was the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Australian Government also had a main part in the country's involvement in ‘WW1'. They wanted Australia to be feared by other countries and wanted to show adherence to Britain. This also gave Australia the upper hand as Britain would return the favour by joining Australia's side in battle if needed. Australian troops were also very naive at the thought of war and took it as an adventure. Pay was also far substantial to the average working wage which also influenced more volunteers to sign up.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1962 until 1972 Australia was involved in the Vietnam War. Approximately 47 000 Australian men and a large number of women severed there. The decision to commit troops to the conflict centred on the fear of communism.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANZUS and SEATO treaties were created in order for the protection of the treaty member countries and the protected states. The ANZUS treaty was founded in result to the escalating fear of communist expansion in the Asia-Pacific region. The terms of the treaty declared that members must show support and unity for each other if under attack. As for the SEATO treaty, it was established, with member countries including: USA, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Thailand, Pakistan and France, in order to protect countries in South East Asia and the Pacific that felt threatened by Communism. Laos, Cambodia and South Vietnam were named as the protected countries, hence the Vietnam War. However, nowhere in these two treaties did the terms stipulate for member countries to go to war if one was attacked and for there to be military involvement to defend protected states. Furthermore the treaties had no reference to communism, whatsoever. Therefore, Robert Menzies excuse to use the alliances as the reason for Australia going to war against North Vietnam, is invalid. Besides the involvement of Australia was due to American and Australian diplomats pressurizing the Vietnamese president into accepting Australia’s desire to support. Australia’s PM blindly thrust Australian troops into the middle of a hell warzone where the methods of war were not conventional, in order to gain support of the US as the nation’s biggest ally. Menzies believed into honouring…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Australia’s National Service –Many people thought that this process was a scheme to enable Australia’s Participation in the Vietnam War, But that was not the. Under the National Service Scheme, twenty-year-old men were required to register with the Department of Labour and National Service (DLNS), they were then subject to a ballot which, if their birth date was drawn, meant the possibility of two years of continuous full-time service in the regular army, followed by three years part-time service in the Army Reserve. As part of their duty, national servicemen on full-time duty were liable for overseas service including combat duties in Vietnam.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    and off the battlefield. Beneficial to the Lieutenant, his meaningful affections for the junior college…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of war, young Australia wanted to prove their loyalty and worth to their “mother country” which they mostly still relied on. At the time, other nations had more men in their army then Britain, so Australia was keen to provide them with soldiers. When enlisting soldiers, the government hid their true thoughts and only provided the public with the exaggerated truth. As the war went on and more people died, Australians finally realized the truth of war. Even though their opinions changed, they still provided Britain with needed soldiers. Even when the armistice was signed and the war ended, the impacts was still felt in Australia for years…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it was first announced in April 1962 that Australia was to fight in Vietnam it was seen by the majority as necessary and needed. Many Australians supported the war because of their fear of communist advancement and the Domino Theory. They were motivated to support the war by the common dreaded thought that Australia might fall next to communist rule. Furthermore many Australians believed fully in the government as a protection strategy. This policy advocated…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Vietnam War, Australia went to war in Korea (Korean War) to fight against communism in Korea where the communist completely dominated the North Korean Region. Additionally Vietnam is a ‘key domino’ to knocking down Australia in the Domino Theory and as a result PM Menzies brought forth Forward Defence to Vietnam. Overall, it shows that Australian would be involved in the Vietnam War to fend off and stop the spread of communism.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 29th of April 1965 was a pivotal moment in Australian military history. In parliament, Robert Menzies proposed his arguments for sending Australian troops into South Vietnam and subsequently announced that Australia would be joining the United States in the Vietnam War. He believed that Australia’s allies would need help and that it was best to stop the spread of communism before it reached Australia: a forward defence technique. The pressure and increasing fear of communism amongst the Australian public would have also influenced parliament. Although faced with opposition, the proposition advanced, and later that year, the first 800 Australian troops were dispatched to Vietnam.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of Australians supported the country's involvement in the Vietnam War in its early years mainly because of the threat of communism. Australia felt that if communism dominated South Vietnam it would be an even bigger risk to Australia because of the domino effect. If Vietnam fell into communism so will its neighboring countries including Australia. Australia did not want to fall into communism and agreeing to the request for help by South Vietnam, Australia supported the war and troops were immediately sent to Vietnam.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Main reasons for conscripting troops were: supporting the mother country Great Britain, equality of sacrifice, and Australian troops had a good reputation that needed defending. Voluntary recruitment had failed to bring in enough troops after the news from the war fronts spread to Australia. Many men were too scared or just couldn’t be bothered saying “What have I got to join for. I have no wife, no children & no parents depending on me so why should I fight. Let those fight that have something to fight for.” Main reasons against conscription were: there wouldn’t be enough people to work, the working class would burden the fight, too many Australians had died already and it would divide Australia even more. Many believed that no one had the right to send someone else to be wounded or killed or to kill or wound someone else. Both sides fought strongly but after two referendums and a whole year of debating the Australian public chose to not go forth with the…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II did indeed influence changes in the Australian home front; some long term and others short term. The evident threat of invasion by the Japanese forced the Australian government to turn to their American allies, forging new foreign policies and a sense of ‘Americanisation’ of Australian cultural. Minority groups including women and Indigenous Australians also experienced changes pushing for equality. Amidst the pinnacle of World War II, forsaken by her mother country, Australia felt vulnerable to the emerging threat of the Japanese in the Pacific; so in turn, then Australian Prime Minster John Curtin called upon the United States allies for support. This new allegiance came as a shock for many older Australian citizens who still…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of Tim O’Brien’s novel, The Things They Carried, paints a vague mental image of people carrying something – an image that is not yet complete for the reader to grasp the purpose of the novel. ‘Things’ are often assumed to be physical, in this novel, the ‘things’ that the soldiers carried were the mental burdens during and after the Vietnam War. Through the use of narratives of the different soldiers, O’Brien is able to follow each characters physical and mental weight that they carried. The…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters of the story “The Things They Carried” mainly were inflicted with two kinds of weights: physical and emotional burden. In the first chapter, Tim O’ Brien sets up his storytelling by writing long lists of the things the soldiers were carrying in the War in Vietnam. Beyond the basic gears of war, he goes on mentioning the personal luggage that varied from person to person, mostly depending on their necessity, helping the reader to get to know the protagonists in a deeper sense this way. To know their souls, their customs, and the way they would probably live their “normal” lives. A letter, a photograph, a bible, the drugs, condoms, comic books, and a pair of moccasins are all life-story-telling property.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story, "The Things They Carried”, Tim O'Brien writes about the soldiers of Vietnam and the burdens they had to carry with them. In this story, O'Brien uses symbolism, irony and the theme of burden and guilt to portray how the war has affected the men and the ways they cope. O’Brien’s usage of these literary devices serves as a remembrance of what the soldiers have left behind and a false sense of security about the violence and death that surrounds them. We are able to see the way each of the characters’ deal with the atrocities of the Vietnam War and what their objects say about who they are.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays