Viirtual Learning Environment
1.) INTRODUCTION
The issue of integration of technology into the teaching process is a crucial part of future development in the teaching and learning process. The benefits that accrue to students in universities and other learning institutions using e-learning are well documented. Over the past years in majority of countries, academic institutions and other institutions of higher learning have been diversifying in delivery of instruction to learners through internet media. These internet media include Virtual Learning Environment system (VLEs), online classrooms and asynchronous distance learning amongst other growing educational technologies.
Learner-centered instructional techniques help students connect with new knowledge and information to what they already know, to increase and improve on the quality of education they already have and also to seek meaningful knowledge and evaluate their own thinking processes. In addition, the internet provides possible benefits such as new methods of communication, flexible access to resources and different methods of assessing lecturers and students. However, for lecturers, formulating internet resources that are appealing, educationally sound, stimulating and easy to use is often time consuming and involves considerable expertise. The applications of VLEs assist lecturers to formulate resources faster and it does not require development of technical skills.
Typically, the application of VLEs enables the users to easily upload their materials and resources, offers an integrated set of internet tools and provides a consistent look and feel that can be customized by the user. Therefore, the employment of technology to support learning is largely prevailed by the use of VLEs. A Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is a software program devised to facilitate instructors in the management of courses for their students. It aims at helping students and teachers with course administration. It can also track the student’s
The issue of integration of technology into the teaching process is a crucial part of future development in the teaching and learning process. The benefits that accrue to students in universities and other learning institutions using e-learning are well documented. Over the past years in majority of countries, academic institutions and other institutions of higher learning have been diversifying in delivery of instruction to learners through internet media. These internet media include Virtual Learning Environment system (VLEs), online classrooms and asynchronous distance learning amongst other growing educational technologies.
Learner-centered instructional techniques help students connect with new knowledge and information to what they already know, to increase and improve on the quality of education they already have and also to seek meaningful knowledge and evaluate their own thinking processes. In addition, the internet provides possible benefits such as new methods of communication, flexible access to resources and different methods of assessing lecturers and students. However, for lecturers, formulating internet resources that are appealing, educationally sound, stimulating and easy to use is often time consuming and involves considerable expertise. The applications of VLEs assist lecturers to formulate resources faster and it does not require development of technical skills.
Typically, the application of VLEs enables the users to easily upload their materials and resources, offers an integrated set of internet tools and provides a consistent look and feel that can be customized by the user. Therefore, the employment of technology to support learning is largely prevailed by the use of VLEs. A Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is a software program devised to facilitate instructors in the management of courses for their students. It aims at helping students and teachers with course administration. It can also track the student’s
References: Beckton, J., 2009. Lumping and Splitting. Rolling out a new VLE at the University of Lincoln. e-Learning: A Reality Check - Do We Practice What We Preach?, 8th-9th January. Benchicou, S De Miranda, M. A., 2008. Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Engineering and Technology Teacher Education: Issues for thought. Journal of the Japanese Society of Technology Education, 50 (1), pp. 17-26. Dublin, L., 2004. The nine myths of e-learning implementation: ensuring the real return on your e-learning investment. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(7), pp. 291-294. El-Haisoni, M. A. a. E., January 2013. Empirical Investigation of the e-Learning Approach in Saudi Universities. International Journal of English and Education, 2(1), pp. 2278-4012. Forsyth, H. P. J. L. R. a. M. J., 2010. Distance education in the era of eLearning: challenges and opportunities for a campus-focused institution. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(1), pp. 15-28. Govindasamy, T., 2002. Successful implementation of e-Learning Pedagogical considerations. Internet and Higher Education, Volume 4, pp. 287-299. K. Sharma, D. S. a. P. P., 2010. Strategic architecture for e-learning at H.P University. International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (7), pp. 575-596. M. Owen, M. B. a., 2000. Implementing Virtual Learning Environments: Looking for Holistic Approach. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3), pp. 39-53. McCalman, R. P. a. J., 2000. Change Management, A Guide to Effective Implementation, London: Sage Publications. Moser, F., 2007. Faculty adoption of educational technology. Educational technology support plays a critical role in helping faculty add technology to their teaching. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 30 (1). Nunes, M. M. a. M., 2006. Organisational issues for e-learning: Critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(7), pp. 542-558. Pahl, C., 2003. Managing evolution and change in web-based teaching and learning environments. Computers & Education, Volume 40, pp. 99-114. R. Sharpe, G. a. R. F., 2006. Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levels for change within academic schools. Research in Learning Technology, 14(2), pp. 135-151. Russell, C., 2009. A Systematic Framework for Managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: individual strategies in context. Research in Learning Technology, 1(7), pp. 3-19. Salmon, G., 2005. Strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation. Research in Learning Technology, 13 (3), pp. 201-218. Schneckenberg, D., 2010. Overcoming barriers for eLearning in universities – portfolio models for competence development of faculty. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41 (6), pp. 979-991. Walker, L. B. a. R., 2007. Effecting institutional change through e-learning: An implementation model for VLE deployment at the University of York. Journal of Organizational Transformational and Social Change, 3 (3), pp. 285-299. Weller, M., 2007. Virtual Learning Environments: Using, choosing and developing your VLE. UK: Routledge. Yorke, M. S. a. J., November 2004. Embedding Staff Development in eLearning in the Production Process and using Policy to Reinforce its Effectiveness. Birmingham, 9th SEDA conference. http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/cosenew/embedding.pdf Zhu, C., 2010