The “anytime, anywhere” aspect of online learning is the most significant advantage over traditional classroom (Arbaugh, 2004:171, cited by Brandon & Hollingshead, 1999; Dede, 1991; Harasim, 1990). Learners can process material at any time from any place (Paechter & Maier, 2010:296, citied by Artino & Stephens, 2009; Narciss et al, 2007). For students who cannot afford to take away from their time-dependent jobs, online programs provide flexibility in time and pace of study so that they are able to work meanwhile maintaining the universities’ academic commitment (Sharpe & Benfield, 2005; Conrad & Donaldson, 2004; Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013). Moreover, by accessing a learning management system such as Moodle, Blackboard, course website, students can achieve clarity about their course information like assignments, test dates to the full extent (Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013:181). On the other hand, online learning could be time-consuming
References: Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. The internet and higher education, 7(3), pp169-182. Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online Baturay, M. H. & Bay, O.F. (2010). The effects of problem-based learning on the classroom community perceptions and achievement of web-based education students. Computers & Education, 55 (1) ,pp43–52. Benfield, Greg. & Sharpe, Rhona. (2005). The Student Experience of E-learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), pp109-126. Bettencourt, L. A. & Houston, M. B. (1999) But that’s not fair! An exploratory study of student perceptions of instructor fairness, Journal of Marketing Education, 21(2), pp84–96. Conrad, R.-M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Dede, C. J. (1991). Emerging technologies: Impacts on distance learning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (pp146–158). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage. Fraser, B. J. (1998) Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants, in: B.J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds) International handbook of science education (Chapter 5). Boston, Kluwer Academic. Harasim, L Jou, Min. & Lin, Yen-Ting. (2012). A Web Application Supported Learning Environment for Enhancing Classroom Teaching and Learning Experiences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 64, pp1–11. Kruger-Ross, M. J. & Waters , R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers & Education, 61, pp176-184. Maier, Brigitte. & Paechter, Manuela. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students ' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), pp292–297. Meyer, Katrina A., 2003, “The Web’s impact on student learning: a review of recent research reveals three areas that can enlighten current online learning practices.” T H E Journal, 30(10), p14. Macdonald, J. (2003), ‘Assessing Online Collaborative Learning: Process and Product’, Computers & Education, 40(4), pp377-391. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Körndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in webbased learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, pp1126−1144. O 'donoghue, Tom., Sweeney, Jill. & Whitehead, Clive. (2007). Traditional face‐to‐face and web‐based tutorials: a study of university students ' perspectives on the roles of tutorial participants. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), pp 311-323. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, Available from: http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf.