Preview

Violence: Words Are More Powerful Than Words

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violence: Words Are More Powerful Than Words
“Violence begins -- and ends -- in communication.” These are wise words from legacyproject.org. Yes, there are many, many cases of physical violence in the world every day but every physical fight starts with some sort of verbal violence. People can use words to make things worse or make thing better. Most of the time people choose to make things worse with their words. Words hold more power than weapons. One reason why words are more powerful than weapons is that if words can hurt, they can also heal. Another, it serves as a mean of cooperation and compromise. Lastly, with words, we can influence someone into thinking something that they are not going to do, or cause someone to make a mistake.
“If words can hurt, they can also heal. Think of the four words, ‘I have a dream.’ The moment they enter your mind, you know who said them -- and
…show more content…
However, words are more powerful than weapons. Rob Waters writes about the effects of disciplining children with a spanking. “Spanking teaches your child to fear you -- not to listen to you or respect you.” This is a quote from Rob Waters in a study on child spanking. Physical violence is very evident and causes pain, but words do more damage than a punch.
In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” Caesar was one of the most influential people in the play. He used his words to persuade people to become a follower of him. Another person in the play who was very persuasive with his words was Mark Antony. Antony, after Brutus, spoke to the common people and used his inspiring words to make them turn against Brutus and plot to get revenge on the conspirators. These are ways the words are more powerful than weapons. It is our responsibility to think before we speak. Words are usually the greatest weapon, so choose to help someone instead of hurting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scheming, manipulation, and backstabbing are common in almost every society in this day and age. As seen on many occasions in Julius Caesar, the conspirators spend a lot of the play plotting against Caesar,because they fear what he might do if he comes to power. Brutus is portrayed as the tragic hero, and he gives numerous speeches to convey his opinions and feelings about the subject matter. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Marcus Brutus makes many appeals to rhetoric, specifically ethos and pathos, in order to get his point across to the audience.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest english authors, Shakespeare, had developed a play called, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar which contains various writing methods. In Act III, one of the main characters, Caesar was killed by Brutus, his companion Antony had constructed a speech for the Romans about Caesar’s death. By comparing Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches, many rhetorical appeals and devices can be seen. Antony was able to gain the trust of the Romans by using Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar. The main goal of Antony’s speech is to persuade the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious by using ethos and staying calm and emotional as he delivered his oration.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vengeance is a powerful. Caesar’s slaying by Brutus sets Antony in motion to deceive his murderers into allowing him to speak to Rome. In his speech to the Romans, Antony turns Rome against Brutus using repetition to convey the irony in his own speech and discredit Brutus, as well as, applying meter to add emphasis to the mutiny, and contrast Brutus’s speech allowing him to connect with his countrymen.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response to Bell Hooks

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Simple physical punishments; such as pinching, flicking, and spanking, are carried out on us at a very young age, and all throughout life. Our parents are here to discipline us, to teach us the difference of right and wrong. When we first misbehave, our parents might tell us to “knock it off” or “stop” and they may raise their voice when asserting these commands. We sometimes stop when told to, but sometimes we ignore their commands and keep misbehaving repeatedly. This is where physical punishment comes into play. A form of physical punishment would and will be carried out on us. At first it may be a simple punishment, but gradually the punishments intensify. Once a punishment has been carried out, many of us become cloaked in fear of punishment and from this fear we learn not to do that mistake again. Simple punishment is used for the good of children and to discipline them, “Dr. David Safir, father of five and grandfather of five, CNN asked him to talk to us about his views on spanking. He said he was spanked as a child, spanked his own children when necessary and believes the occasional use of physical punishment -- not abuse -- can be an effective tool for parents” (Zeidler) If these simple punishments are executed out…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fist Stick Knife Gun

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Violence was a huge recurring issue throughout Geoffrey Canada’s book Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun. The book drew upon numerous incidents of violence encountered by Geoffrey himself, his daughter, and his students. As a child growing up in the Bronx, it was essential that Canada knew how to fight. Ironically not fighting often caused more pain and difficulties in the long run than fighting did. Canada was an intelligent child and was more advanced than many of his peers in the community therefore he was placed in more advanced classes. The problem with these classes was that students often associated being smart with being weak and not being able to stand up for yourself. In the Bronx, fighting at school was a norm and it was a way to gain respect from your peers. Canada chose to fight as a child because he knew doing so would have a positive impact on his educational experience. Proving that he was both smart and tough was essential to his survival in the Bronx. Canada’s daughter on the other hand, growing up in Boston was not raised around the scale of violence that he had grown up with. One day while on the bus she was attacked by another child, her face was bleeding from being scratched. Prior to this event she had no worries and never focused much on violence. Unfortunately after this incident she was forced to realize that violence is a reality for many people even at school, where you think you are the safest. Both Canada and his daughter had to face the reality that violence was unfortunately a norm in their communities. It was important for them to not let others take advantage of them and to be able to stand up for themselves if need be. They also understood that violence was a last resort, they did not go looking for trouble and tried to solve issues with conversation as much as they could.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psy/ 101 Final Paper

    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Corporal punishment is used as a discipline method for children. One of the most commonly used discipline methods in America is corporal punishment [ (Gershoff & Larzelere, 2002) ]. Is corporal punishment considered to be an effective form of discipline for children? Many parents’ opinions are different on how to properly discipline a misbehaving child. It has been proven children who receive corporal punishment as a form of discipline face several challenges. Due to the affect of corporal punishment other discipline methods are available and will be discussed more in details.…

    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    -Term Consequences of Corporal Punishment: Proceeding of a conference, February 9 and 10, 1996 in Elk Grove Village, Illinois). [electronic version] Pediatrics, v98.n4:pp837(6).…

    • 7524 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People can have two different views on this question, and its one that can cause much debate. In my opinion, I believe it is completely wrong to use violence to prove something, since I think it makes every matter worse. Violence is always wrong, even in self-defense. Usually if someone is threatening you it's because that person feels threatened themself; if you make it clear you're no threat to that person they’ll probably stand down. And in the few cases where they don’t it's much better to die knowing that you have refrained from violence than to live knowing that you have hurt or killed another person. Another reason why I think violence isn’t right to prove a point is that it actually can kill more people than it can save. America and Germany fought for power even though some suggest it was to solve conflict. Yet after the war, Russia tried going after America, and since then, there as been unrest between the two. Now they have created weapons of mass destruction in order to scare each other off and try gain peace. But what happens when the time comes to use those weapons to "solve the conflict"? Will there be anyone left to save? Violence is the WORST way to solve conflict, and if you try to prove a point it only makes things worse. Overall, I believe violence is never good. It will never be good. Violence only causes a vicious cycle. Two wrongs do not make a right. No matter what happens, do not use violence, violence will only make matters worse, not better. There are many better ways of sorting out things, rather than violence.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Childhood Love Lessons

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Welts, scars, and bruises are just a few of the marks abusive parents leave on their children. However, a spanking or a light slap on the hand are some simple ways of teaching loving discipline. In Justice: Childhood Love Lessons Bell Hooks claims, “No one can claim to be loving when behaving abusively.” Parents who abuse their child do not either show or teach love. Despite that it is unfair to say that a slap on the hand is abuse, and the parents who commit these actions are abusing their children. There is a difference between teaching with light physical punishment and abusing your child.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pros and Cons of Spanking

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The theory of discipline has been debated for decades. Arguments over how it should be carried out and how harsh it should be has been discussed. One aspect of discipline has been shoved into the dark, the effect on the child. No matter how much it is spoken of children remember what happened to them in their childhood. Whether they were pleasant or not can lead to problems later in life. One debate that shall soon be settled deals with the spanking of children.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human nature seeks ways in which to resolve any conflict that’s we are confronted with. The use of violence seems to be an attractive method to put an end to conflict. History has shown that violence has been an effective tool to resolve conflict, and there is no doubt that violence can resolve violence in given situations. However we need to ask ourselves, is violence the only way to resolve conflict? And does it always resolve the conflict? Due to the recent increase in violent behavior amongst teenagers in our society I would like to present a speech on use of violence in response to conflict. I am writing this speech to present to my fellow peers as I think that it would be the best way to get my point across to my audience and maintain the seriousness of the issue. I will use formal language which will also uphold the seriousness of the issue being discussed. I will be referring to Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible to support my ideas and add credibility to my argument. My purpose of delivering this speech is to convince my audience that violence is not the only way to deal with conflict and doesn’t always resolve the conflict.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays