Preview

Voluntary Euthanasia and Dr. Kevorkian

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Voluntary Euthanasia and Dr. Kevorkian
Assisted Suicide Euthanasia, possibly one of the most controversial topics in today’s society. A word that derives from the Greek language meaning, “good death”. Euthanasia is a term that refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. Dr. Jack Kevorkian once stated, “In quixotically trying to conquer death doctors all too frequently do no good for their patients’ “ease” but at the same time they do harm instead by prolonging and even magnifying patients’ dis-ease.” Euthanasia is nothing new to the world, in the 1500’s William Shakespeare portrayed the Roman practice in Julius Caesar by depicting Brutus running into the sword held by Strato. Suffering has always been a part of human existence. Requests to end suffering by means of death through both physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia have occurred since the beginning of medicine. Assisted suicide is more common that most would think, Based on a recent study, 57% of physicians practicing today have received a request for physician-assisted suicide in some form or another. As Katie Pickert states in TIME U.S. “The issue of whether human beings –and more pointedly, doctors- have the right to help others die has been in the public discourse since before the birth of Christ”(1). In the 5th century B.C. the ancient Greeks and Romans tended to support the concept of assisted suicide. Even as physicians in the ancient times swore to the Hippocratic oath, “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if

I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion” there were still many that did not follow these guidelines and proceeded to assist or kill regardless. Ian Dowbiggin wrote, “Throughout classical antiquity, there was widespread support for voluntary death as opposed to prolonged agony, and physicians complied by often giving their patients the poisons they requested” (A Merciful End). More often than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dr. Death, Death machine, and murderer. These terms surround Dr. Jack Kevorkian and make his story menacing. Dr. Kevorkian, a physician in the 1990’s, used and advocated Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS). PAS describes a physician knowledgeably giving a person medication to induce death with the person’s consent. Dr. Kevorkian would provide a device which attached to a person, allowing them to flip a switch that caused death.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ncreasingly, in the courts and the media and in conversation, we are hearing about euthanasia and the so-called "right to die."…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a doctor, you swear to an oath that is to provide lifesaving medical care and to try and extend life comfortably, the best way you can. In “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong” Ryan T. Anderson states why a physician assisting in a terminally ill patient’s death is ethically and morally wrong. This article that I chose was published on Newsweek on March 26, 2015, but first appeared on The Daily Signal. As the article describes what and how this particular approach works, it goes in great detail to explain why it should not even be an option for physicians.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physicians and patients debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide is okay to do in any circumstances, because there are pros and cons to every side. One might say that if a physician assists in the suicide it may help someone not suffer through a slow painful death. Another person might argue that if a physician does assist even by just prescribing the medicine is morally wrong and against the oath the physician takes at the beginning of his or her career. Understanding some people are terminally ill and want to just die versus putting up the fight is a hard situation to understand, but some physicians do “understand”. Even though they understand does not mean that they will agree to assist in taking the pain away from someone. On the other hand a patient may want to live as long as possible and prosper every bit of their life even if it means being in a vegetative state.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic oath states “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.” (“Greek Medicine - The Hippocratic Oath." U.S National Library of Medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2016.) “The American Medical Association (AMA) policy states, "Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as a healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.” (Pearson, John. "Point: Assisted Suicide Is Unnecessary." Points of View: Assisted Suicide (2016): 5. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 29 Oct.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians assisted suicide can be defined as the voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician (Snyder 2001). In order to truly explore the ethical dilemma of physicians assisted suicide we must first understand and grasp the base meaning of the term, as well as let go of any prior misconceptions we may have surrounding the topic. The process of physician-assisted suicide is different than you might imagine. Before I had researched this topic I had the inaccurate impression that physician assisted suicide was a procedure similar to that which you would imagine for an animal being put down or euthanized. As many of us unfamiliar with the topic might believe,…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For decades, the public, government, and physicians have been debating over the “Death with Dignity Act” or “Physician-Assisted Suicide.” It started back in the Ancient Greek and Rome time. The debate originated around the Hippocratic Oath and the condemnation of the practice. With the upsurge of Christianity, many physicians continued to condemn the practice. Within the last two centuries the public has spurned many discussions about Physician-assisted suicide and Euthanasia from many different historic perspectives (Procon.org, 2012). Although this debate has been lengthy and many of the issues discussed over the centuries are repetitive, new ideas and concerns do emerge with the current debate. What do you think when you here assisted suicide? Would you want your family member to suffer with an illness that has put them in so much pain that they cannot function? Personally, I would not want to see my family member suffer in pain while they are dying with no cure.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many different organizations like the World Health Organization or WHO, are concerned that the nature of the physician - patient relationship will be irrevocably altered for the worse if physicians are given a license to “kill”. (Young). However, advocates for physician assisted suicide like Margaret Battin will argue that physicians whom alone society has entrusted custody of the means of ensuring a good death, have a positive duty to help terminally ill patients in intractable pain who wish to die, which is a duty grounded in the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance (Young).…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1,672). A huge theme that society has seen in regards to euthanasia is the physician’s role. Physicians have been seen as murderers for assisting the death of their patients and they have been referred to as mercy-killers. However, many people tend to disregard the fact that even the physician, who is usually the one being blamed, can actually be the victim as well. According to the American Medical Association’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, it was stated that “although life-prolonging medical treatment may be withheld, the physician should not intentionally cause death” (as cited in Dickinson, Clark, Winslow & Marples, 2005, p. 44). In a study mentioned by Dickinson et al. (2005) it was found that when physicians were asked about whether or not active voluntary euthanasia (AVE) should be legalized, the percentage of those who were in favor of was between 35% and 71% (p.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide grants the opportunity for a doctor to lethally inject drugs into a consented patient. This controversial topic has sparked a huge moral issue. The feud between whether it is morally acceptable ultimately pays no key role. People have been committing suicide in gruesome ways for hundreds of years and will continue to do so. If their only ambition is to die, why not let them do it peacefully? Even though this subject is seen as morally unacceptable, physician-assisted suicide should only be legal in certain circumstances, including the following: when a patient is terminally ill, with validation from their doctor, inmates in prison sentenced for life, and patients in an irreversible coma.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians and other medical caregivers have the obligation to maintain life, as sworn in the Hippocratic Oath which states: 'I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect'. The Hippocratic Oath is an oath stating the obligations and proper conduct of doctors, taken by those beginning medical practice. The Hippocratic physician rejects the view that the patient's choice for death can make killing him right. Helping a patient commit suicide directly disobeys the Oath. The official position of the Catholic Church in Rome remains that killing of a human being, even by an act of omission to eliminate suffering, violates divine law and offends the dignity of the human person.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays