Preview

VoluntaryAssistedEuthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
VoluntaryAssistedEuthanasia
Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia
Tony Smith
Grand Canyon University
Ethical Decision Making in Health Care
NRS-437V
Lorraine Hover
April 30, 2014
Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia
Voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has been a subject of great controversy the past few decades in the United States. The critical difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide is who administers the life-ending dose of medication. Euthanasia is illegal in the all fifty United States and the District of Columbia. Euthanasia involves the physician or a designated party in administering medical agents. Assisted suicide mandates that the patient self-administer prescribed medications, and in addition choose the time of execution. (Wikipedia)
The “right to die” controversy is on-going and fuels debate in morality, bioethics, legal guardianship, civil rights, and euthanasia. The right to die identifies that an individual with a terminal illness is entitled to pursue euthanasia or assisted suicide. The case of Karen Ann Quinlan in 1977 is hallmark in this debate, a case in which the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in her parents favor, removing her from mechanical ventilation due to her persistent vegetative state. This landmark judgment set significant precedents involving future cases, and the development and implementation of formal ethics committees. Notably, the state of California in 1977 legalized living wills, providing advance guidelines for institutions to follow in the event a patient is suffering from a terminal condition.
Physician-assisted suicide is legal in four states, Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Vermont. There is specific criteria that must be met to entitle a person to pursue voluntary euthanasia; mental competency, state residency is required, a minimum age of eighteen, six months or less until expected death, and two oral requests at least 15 days apart and one written request. The Department of Human Services-Health Services enforces



References: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/ http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=00132 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality of_euthanasia Letter to J. H. Reynolds, 3 May 1818 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    court case to deal with the issue of end-of-life care was the matter of in re Quinlan, a 1976 New Jersey state court case. Quinlan became the first icon of the “right to die” movement. The case of Cruzan v. Director of Missouri Dep’t of Health took the end-of-life issue one step farther down the road toward active euthanasia. The Cruzan family wanted to remove their daughter’s food and water (ordinary care) rather than artificial life support (extraordinary care). The Court’s decision in favor of death by dehydration and starvation was made in 1990. Wendlends case was more unique he was still conscious so the courts decided that we must for now continue to operate on the assumption that life is the best interest for the non terminally ill patient. This case also points out how important it is to have a living will or POA that is aware of your wishes when it comes to living or…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vacco Vs Quill Case Study

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. In particular, this Court's recent decisions concerning the right to refuse medical treatment and the right to abortion instruct that a mentally competent, terminally…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions relating to marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, child rearing and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. In particular, this Court's recent decisions concerning the right to refuse medical treatment and the right to abortion instruct that a mentally competent, terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rapid and dramatic developments in medicine and technology have given us the power to save more lives than was ever possible in the past. Medicine has put at our disposal the means to cure or to reduce the suffering of people afflicted with diseases that were once fatal or painful. At the same time, however, medical technology has given us the power to sustain the lives (or, some would say, prolong the deaths) of patients whose physical and mental capabilities cannot be restored, whose degenerating conditions cannot be reversed, and whose pain cannot be eliminated. As medicine struggles to pull more and more people away from the edge of death, the plea that tortured, deteriorated lives be mercifully ended grows louder and more frequent. Californians are now being asked to support an initiative, entitled the Humane and Dignified Death Act, that would allow a physician to end the life of a terminally ill patient upon the request of the patient, pursuant to properly executed legal documents. Under present law, suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Whether or not we as a society should pass laws sanctioning "assisted suicide" has generated intense moral controversy.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate around euthanasia is a tricky topic from the perspective of both patients and doctors. Should it be allowed, and if so, when is it appropriate to practice? Should doctors be held to moral standards when practicing euthanasia, and if so, which ones? Is killing a patient any different than letting a patient die? Daniel Callahan has responded to philosophers such as James Rachels in his article, “When Self-Determination Runs Amok,” and insists that recognizing the moral distinction between killing and letting die is crucial in evaluating whether euthanasia is permissible. Callahan discusses how euthanasia should not be permitted under any circumstances based on three important turning…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled that patients do not have the right to Physician- Assisted Suicide under the constitution. However, the Supreme Court did not ban PAS (US Legal, Inc., n.d.). Later, in 2006 the Supreme Court ruled that laws related to Physician- Assisted suicide would be voted upon within each state. Currently, Physician- Assisted suicide is legal in five states in the U.S. including Oregon, Vermont, Washington and California where it is mandated by state law. Montana is mandated by court ruling. The first state to legalize physician assisted suicide was Oregon in 1994, followed by Washington in 2009. Arizona, Utah, Colorado, Nevada, Kansas, Minnesota, Idaho, Michigan, Tennessee, North Carolina, Maryland, New Jersey, New York,…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those states are Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Vermont. In Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington the individual who is requesting to put an end to his or her life must be sound mind when requesting this service and must be confirmed by a doctor or…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Ninety percent of the people who die each year are victims of prolonged illnesses or have experienced a predictable and steady decline due to heart disease, diabetes or Alzheimer's disease. Those with a terminal illness should be able to die peacefully, quickly, and surrounded by the people they love. Physician-assisted suicide is legal in six states and people are still fighting today to get it legalized. Whether physician assisted suicide is compassion or murder is a question that is still asked today. Doctor-assisted suicide…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Thesis, Description of the topic and related ethical implications, Obligations to your profession and work as a nurse) Debra Burden…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout many cases in the past it has been seen that the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause are objective and “...deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition...”(Katsh 101). Yet no matter how much our nation has evolved this is a decision that is still very rooted in our nation's values. The States' assisted suicide bans have in recent years been reexamined and reaffirmed. It is clear that because of advances in medicine and technology more and more people are dying in medical institutions. People want to keep the dignity at the end of life and as a result they have remained firm in their decision of the ban, but have created “living wills” and have permitted refusal of life-sustaining medical treatment as ways to give them more autonomy. The many cases have also shown that “many of…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States alone, there are five states that have legalized physician-assisted death in some form: California, Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. While accepting this procedure into their practice,…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the organization Death with Dignity, the states who have passed and legalized, as of December 19, 2016, PAS are California, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Colorado. These five states have the statues named the Death with Dignity Act. Montana is also a state which allows physician assisted suicide and it was passed by the State Supreme Court. According to the Death with Dignity organization, the Death with Dignity Act serves as purpose to helping terminally ill patients without the interruption of several opposing forces such as religious groups, politicians the government etc. In the Death with Dignity Act, “Death with Dignity statutes allow mentally competent adult state residents who have a terminal illness with a confirmed…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Montana. The difference is that euthanasia involves a third party to administer the dose, whereas PAD leaves it up to the patient to take it.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A common case associated with the Right to Die is the case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Ms. Quinlan was a twenty-one year-old living in New Jersey. She slipped into a coma after consuming too much alcohol and overdosing on drugs. Her parents wept as they thought their daughter was going to die. Ms. Quinlan was immediately put on a respirator and miraculously survived, although she was completely unresponsive, was fed through a tube, and could not survive without medicine. The Quinlan family noticed that their daughter was struggling and they requested for her daughter to be taken off life support and allowed to die. The hospital refused and an unsuccessful lawsuit followed. However, once turned to the New Jersey Supreme Court, the ruling was overturned. Strict guidelines were in place. The medical team agreed and took Ms. Quinlan off the feeding tube and respirator. Doctors kept a twenty-four seven watch on Miss Quinlan, feeding her and providing common needs, knowing that she still had some fight left in her. Miss Quinlan fought for ten years in pain until acute pneumonia ended her life. This case had a huge impact on all decisions for the Right to Die. Miss Quinlan’s suffering was cited as the reason the Right to Die should be available for adults that are going to die. Although Ms. Quinlan showed America that there is hope in surviving, it also showed America that…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays