Preview

Vygotsky Piaget

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1257 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vygotsky Piaget
Reflection Paper
Vygotsky & Piaget
Cognitive Development

Vygotsky and Piaget both had many theories on cognitive development. Some were similar and some were different. They discussed areas such as the relationship between learning and development and the way children’s cognitive abilities develop. I would personally like to integrate many of their wise theories into my classroom. Piaget and Vygotsky had similar views on many things and within those similarities were differences. Piaget believed that thinking is the main part of child development. They both viewed a child’s development as buildup of changes that should not be viewed as a growing collection of skills and ideas. Piaget said that these changes happen in distinct stages while Vygotsky viewed them in non-distinct stages. He spoke more about the changes in a child’s mind at specific times rather than specific characteristics. They both agree that children create their own understandings and with age and experience they restructure their thoughts and understanding. Both Vygotsky and Piaget believe in social transmission. Social transmission is the idea that some thoughts are based on cultural wisdom and are passed down from generation to generation. Piaget believed that it has an impact on the content of knowledge. Vygotsky thought it plays a much larger role such as the content and nature of the thinking process. They both felt that kids used sensory motor thinking, solve problems using perceptions and motor actions. On the idea of mature thought, Vygotsky believed that sensory motor thinking is a result of shared activity and communication rather then maturation of sensory motor schemas. There are many differences in thought and views between Vygotsky and Piaget. Piaget focused on the child’s interactions with objects and Vygotsky focused on social interactions. Piaget believed in active learning, which is the view that children develop knowledge and learn by physically and mentally



Bibliography: 1) Doolittle, P. E. (1995). Understanding Cooperative Learning through Vygotsky 's Zone of Proximal Development. 2) Christy, T. (2013). Vygotsky, Cognitive Development and Language. Historiographia Linguistica, 40(1/2), 199-227. doi:10.1075/hl.40.1.07chr 3) Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (1996). Tools of the mind: the Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill. 4) Morrison, G. S. (1976). Early childhood education today. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) One major difference between Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories is that Vygotsky emphasized that… Page Ref: 267…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second part of this essay discusses the cognitive theory development. Lev Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development looks at how children learn from the environment that surrounds them. Vygotsky believed that children are born with certain mental functions such as their ability to focus on certain objects in their environment. According to his theory, children lack higher mental functions such as thinking and ability to problem solve. It is through guidance learning and assistance from Early Years Facilitators that help children learn. Vygotsky believed that children learn through their surroundings and through interactions. According to Oates, (2005) P.35 ‘Vygotsky’s theory of children’s development is greater when they work in their…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrasting points between Piaget and Vygotsky, they have very different ideas for how the cognitive development took place and continued. Piaget believed…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cyp 3.1

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    like piaget posited children learn from hand on experiences. However unlike piaget he claimed that timely and sensitive invention by adults when children are learning a new task (zone of proximal development) could help children to learn new tasks. Vygotsky also stressed the importance of social interaction he felt other children can guide each other’s development as well as adults. Vygotsky also thought that children needed to be active in their own learning and that play is important for holistic learning.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Vygotsky, the child is an apprentice who actively learns by interacting with an adult mentor, who provides the child with knowledge and cognitive tools. Where learning theory saw the child as a passive recipient of training/ conditioning, and Piaget saw the child as a lone scientist, Vygotsky saw the child as a collaborator with adults (M. W. Watson, 2002).…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Vygotsky’s views conflict with Piaget’s on the social and cultural influences as Vygotsky considered that the use of language was the driving force to a child’s cognitive development. Vygotsky also placed more importance on the social influences impacting on cognitive development whereas Piaget was criticised for underestimating this as he stated “much of what child learns begin by accident –The child accidentally performs some action, perceives it, like it and then repeats the action assimilating it into her or his existing schemes” (Hook et al, 2002,…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.) The theories of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky have probably had the most influence on our ideas about how young children learn. Although they worked at about the same time, they approached the topic from slightly different perspectives and emphasized different aspects of children's cognitive development. Piaget focused on the way an individual child acts upon objects in the…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Les Vygotsky believes that children copy what they see their parents doing. He believed in cultural, Vygotsky believes in children construct knowledge. Vygotsky believes social interaction is vital ingredients in learning in development. Vygotsky believes the children should be shown so they can be successful. Piaget, Erikson’s, Skinner and Vygotsky believe that children learn by how and they think they also learn with intelligent and cognitive development.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early Years Framework

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He also believed that cognitive development results from the impute of language. Vygotsky (1934-1987) also believed that language and thought are different. The reason to this is, language and what goes on in baby’s head are two different things until, the age of three where they start putting words together and start thinking their thoughts using language and making sense. Moreover, as cited in Saul McLeod report 2007, Vygotsky theory (1934-1987) also emphasises on the role of an adult in supporting cognitive development and language. Additionally, Vygotsky (1934-1987) also believed that cognitive development connects with social interaction from guided learning within the ‘Zone of Proximal Development’. Whereas Piaget believed that children, cognitive developments depends on their independent…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When comparing the work of Piaget and Vygotsky, thought is given about the profound impact their theories have made on child development and learning. It is interesting how they both approached this topic from different perspectives and emphasized different methodologies. Educators, scholars, and parents have used their philosophies to understand how children learn and to create strategies to teach them. While their theories do share some similarities, there are some differences.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vygotsky

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Vygotsky believes that young children are curious and actively involved in their own learning and the discovery and development of new understandings/schema. Vygotsky placed more emphasis on social contributions to the process of development, whereas Piaget emphasized self-initiated discovery.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Children are actively involved in their learning and are curious about their surroundings (McLeod, 2014). Piaget believed in independent discovery that happens in stages. Vygotsky believed that learning was something that continued all throughout life. Vygotsky differs from Piaget in the idea of the influence of social factors. He feels that with an adult helper, children can learn more and use their new knowledge to direct choices yet to come.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most obvious difference is that Piaget's stages are hierarchical, while Vygotsky's are not. This means that one of Piaget's stages must be "completed" before moving on to the next; Vygotsky's theory does not depend on time. Also, Piaget's stages imply that children cognitively develop on their own. That is, a child completes one of Piaget's stages on his own, without the help of outside aid. For example, during the sensorimotor stage, a child understands that an object exists even when it is out of sight; no social interaction is needed for a child to understand that. On the other hand, Vygotsky's theory concentrates more on the social interactions and aide given to a child while he develops. For example, a child will learn by interacting and communicating with older peers and adults who are more knowledgeable. When teachers support students as they learn, scaffolding takes place, which is another example of Vygotsky's social interactions.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lev Vygotsky

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    first time. Second, I will talk about his theories and thesis's that change the psychological world forever. Last, I will tell you how you can use his methods in your own classroom. Since Vygotsky is not that well known, many people pass on his information for Piaget's information in theis field.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Development

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Vygotsky does not refer to stages in the way that Piaget does. Hence Vygotsky assumes cognitive development varies across cultures, whereas Piaget states cognitive development is mostly universal across cultures. Vygotsky places considerably more emphasis on social factors contributing to cognitive development (Piaget is criticized for underestimating this). Vygotsky states “cognitive development stems from social interactions from guided learning within the zone of proximal development as children and their partners co-construct knowledge” (Lee & Gupta, 1995). In contrast Piaget maintains that cognitive development stems largely from independent explorations in which children construct knowledge of their own. For Vygotsky, the environment in which children grow up will influence how they think and what they think about. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the role of language in cognitive development (again Piaget is criticized for lack of emphasis on this), (Lee & Gupta, 1995). For Vygotsky, cognitive development results from an internalization of language. According to Piaget, “language depends on thought for its development” (Carlson, 2013). For Vygotsky, thought and language are initially separate systems from the beginning of life, merging at around three years of age, producing…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays