By the end of his writing Lippman abandons his sarcastic tone for seriousness. With his sarcasm Lippman drags the authors of political writing and the piece he read in particular. Lippman throws the author’s writing down from a clean piece of political work to a common-man’s collage of overused and possibly one sided words. Lippman’s tone seems to linger between sarcasm and seriousness through the bulk of his writing. Further towards the last paragraph it becomes more serious and by the last paragraph Lippman speaks with clear seriousness. Making his views on political writing unmistakably
By the end of his writing Lippman abandons his sarcastic tone for seriousness. With his sarcasm Lippman drags the authors of political writing and the piece he read in particular. Lippman throws the author’s writing down from a clean piece of political work to a common-man’s collage of overused and possibly one sided words. Lippman’s tone seems to linger between sarcasm and seriousness through the bulk of his writing. Further towards the last paragraph it becomes more serious and by the last paragraph Lippman speaks with clear seriousness. Making his views on political writing unmistakably