Preview

War and Legitimate Self-Defense

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War and Legitimate Self-Defense
War and Legitimate Self-Defense

Starting a war is an immoral act. It is a very serious sin against the Fifth Commandment and it has been condemned by the Church’s Magisterium throughout all of Catholic social teaching. There are more appropriate ways that we have been taught to solve conflicts. Pope Pius XII even warned us that “Nothing is lost by peace; everything is lost by war.” War itself has been one of the greatest threats to the sacredness of life throughout the entirety of human existence because of its horrible devastation to human life. In fact, it is estimated that between forty million and seventy million people died as a result of World War II. One would think that this loss alone would help convince the world that this fighting is not necessary, but clearly, we have not learned our lessons. Wars tend to cause more civilian deaths than soldier deaths due to the indiscriminate use of force, famines, diseases, and genocides that associate themselves with the evils of war. For these reasons the Church does everything within her power to prevent war from starting. Moral law requires that all citizens and all nations do everything they can to avoid war. Pope Paul VI supported this notion by calling for “War no more; no more war!” in his speech to the United Nations assembly. The Church’s reason and the Law of Love tell us that it makes more sense to resolve conflicts without choosing violence, although this choice may be a difficult one to make. When war occurs, we may have to choose whether to defend ourselves through force and violence or through nonviolent resistance. Legitimate defense is the teaching that limited violence is morally acceptable in defending yourself or your nation from an attack. The Divine Law does not forbid this type of defense because when threatened with bodily harm by an unjust aggressor, we have the right to defend ourselves and other innocent people who are also being threatened by the aggressor. Harming the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Most wars are fought for territory, money, or political and religious freedom and, as a result, many wars involve Christianity and religion…

    • 650 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to keep up with human thought, human government and society needs to be reborn. The future is now, but we need to learn from our past. Look to the ancient ones, and see what made them successful. It has been proven time and time again that the old system and Church is losing its power and control. The importance of the Catholic Church in everyday life will need to be set aside, to allow humans to explore new ideas about the world. It is time to heal ourselves, put aside our old beliefs, and start to accept new ones. We have brought a new time upon ourselves, and we need to accept…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vacco Vs Quill Case Study

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia."…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While some religions, like Christianity and Islam, may have defended war in time of defense, other such as Buddhism condemned war at all accounts, as well as the Daoism. I will now go through some different religious views on war.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All Quiet Final

    • 702 Words
    • 1 Page

    Wars are very harmful phenomena that cause pain and harm to all of the people that…

    • 702 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    'In war some sorts of restraint, both on what we can legitimately fight for (jus ad bellum) and on how we may legitimately fight (jus in bello), are morally required'.1 However, recent theorists also add the responsibility and accountability of warring parties after the war (jus post bellum) to the main two categories of just war theory. From Christian perspective the function of the JWT was simply an excuse of making war morally and religiously possible writes Michael Walzer. He also agrees with its defendants, that it made war possible in a world where war was, sometimes, necessary. JWT is therefore to be used as a sort of moral rule-book from which legitimate instances of the use of force can be read off whenever needed.2 That said this essay aims to investigate and legitimate World War II by examining jus ad bellum's predominant principles – just cause, rightful authority and right intention, further by examining jus in bello's essential principle of non-combatant immunity and discrimination, and finally, looking closely at two peculiar moral events of closing days of World War II.…

    • 3976 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict is inevitable, and constantly present in life. Whether it’s obvious and right in front of your face or hidden beneath a pile of lies someone will always suffer because of it. Although that being said, without it- would we truly understand the importance of peace? There are some out there who believe that some of the greatest triumphs and acts of the human spirit were during times of great conflict such as wars and repression’s. But I believe that these events have caused the most horrific demonstrations of human nature in the act of killing the innocent.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War and Warcraft

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The wars of religion escalated because many people were unhappy with their culture and societies few of religion. Martin Luther was one of the first to be outspoken. He stated that he did not believe that the religious society should forgive all sins. This eventually made others think and turned into a large amount of society not pleased with the religious culture of the Roman Catholic Church. There was one faith, one law and one king. The social order wanted a change in religion and took a deeper look into the doctrine. This led to many political issues. How was the church and kings going to maintain civil order with these new ideas? The state, society and religion were no longer going to be binding together. This showed the way to anarchy, destruction and of course, war.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wars have defined the history of Europe. They have stimulated turning points in both culture and knowledge and have effectively changed the futures of many European countries. Wars have been started for multitude of reasons; however as the years have progressed the catalyst of these wars have shifted with the qualms of both the government and society. Initially, many of the European wars were provoked by religious differences. Later on wars were started over governmental changes and after that they were provoked by internal discontent. The Holy Roman Empire caused a period of European history brimmed with religious wars.…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas law, “Stand Your Ground” states that a person may use deadly force in a reasonable self-defense situation, without the need to retreat when a threat presumes itself (US News and World Report, 2016). The positive outcome the law was enacted to accomplish was to give the right to the people to defend themselves, family or property by using this law for self-defense (Texas Stand your Ground Law exp).…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Catholic Social Teaching

    • 479 Words
    • 3 Pages

    11. The proper formation of _just war_ is recognized by Church as an invaluable dimension of determining the moral weight of any military conflict.…

    • 479 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Self Defense

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are justice system to make correction when individual that breaks the law. The concept of two affirmative in the law has been placed for a purpose. Those are tools that are able to help with interrogation and also in the legal system of courts. People break the laws for many reasons some do it because of their beliefs, out of revenge and others just behave that way. Some people feel like it’s a necessity to do something out of the law because they don’t want to feel control by the government. There are many ways to prove if someone innocent or guilty in the court system based on the crime they committed. There are two affirmative defenses which typically possesses the burden of production as well as the burden of persuasion, justification…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays