Preview

War Crimes and the International Community

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Crimes and the International Community
Running head: War Crimes and the International Community

War Crimes and the
International Community

Antilkumar Gandhi
Professor Farber
Winter 2013
Abstract

What are war crimes? Inhuman acts have been committed in all wars throughout human history. It has only been in the last 2 centuries that certain acts that were committed during war were found to be so reprehensible that they were labeled war crimes. Even thought these acts were committed during the "fog of war", they still merited punishment in a court of law in the eyes of the international community. When military and political leaders began to systematically target large civilian groups because of their nationality, ethnicity, gender or religion, then the international community began to see the necessity of holding political leaders accountable for their political decisions in a court of law, (Hauss, 2003). After World War II, when the atrocities of the Holocaust became well known, the victorious Allied powers decided to hold war crimes tribunals to punish the political and military leaders of Germany and Japan. The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials were the first of their kind in establishing international precedent for the prosecution of war crimes. Later war crimes that were committed in Yugoslavia and Rwanda resulted in the creation of separate tribunals by the United Nations to punish the leaders who perpetrated these acts. Attempts are being made to set up an International Criminal Court, but several powerful countries, including the United States, have refused to support its establishment.

Introduction

The history of war crimes tribunals only begins after World War II, when the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals were established. The Allied powers of World War I attempted to prosecute war crimes committed by the Axis powers, but no prosecutions by an international tribunal ever took place. A commission established


References: Beasley, David (2009). Background: War Crimes Tribunals in History. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Radio Free Asia. Website: www.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/war-crime.html Budge, Kent G Pacific War Online Encyclopedia. Website: pwencycl.kgbudge.com/G/e/Geneva_and_Hague_Conventions.htm Cassette, Jacquie (2000) Chambers, John Whiteclay II (2000). War Crimes. Retrieved 7/31/09 from The Oxford Companion to American Military History Cornish, Paul (2009). Geneva and Hague Conventions. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Military History Companion Hauss, Charles (Chip), (2003). War Crimes. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Beyond Intractability.org. Website: www.beyondintractability.org/essay/war_crimes_general/ Kafala, Tarik
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Lawrence Weschler's Vermeer In Bosnia
    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Summary Of Lawrence Weschler's Vermeer In Bosnia

    The reason is, as Weschler states, “Such interethnic violence usually gets stoked by specific individuals’ intent on immediate political or material advantage, who then calls forth the legacies of earlier and previously unaddressed grievances. (Weschler 784)” The author emphasizes that violence is often fueled by few individuals’ greed of political power and material gains. Hence, when we judge the immoral crimes of war criminals, it would be too rash for us to simplify or generalize that each individual of the criminal group bears the guilt and the responsibility of the war crimes. However, we cannot ignore the fact that the actions of individuals are often influenced by the pressure and the expectations of…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq
    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    The Allies had learned invaluable lessons from the obvious failure of the Treaty of Versailles. While reparations were still severe, the Allied Powers served as conquerors rather than disciplinarians, separating Germany into four military zones, they then stripped it of industry, dismantled the government, and instituted a democratic system. Militarily, the Allies rounded up all German military forces and rendered them inoperative until they could be disarmed. Maritime and aeronautical shipping were all but eliminated and outlined specific orders that would ensure continued control over the region. Another important provision made was the Nuremberg Trials, which allowed the Allied Powers to punish those directly responsible for the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Suffering In The Book Thief
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Suffering In The Book Thief

    War is a foul and nauseating occurrence throughout history. Nevertheless, it is something that has happened more than once. There are numerous amount of people who have experienced the events of a war. Each person can have a different perspective and experiences. However, those people can be categorized as victims, perpetrators, or bystanders.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Genocide Dbq
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Genocide Dbq

    International law was the force behind the Nuremberg trials of Nazi officers in the late 1940’s and in the trial of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosavic. All forms of punishment face difficult challenges such as the ethicality of economic sanctions. Sanctions can easily affect an entire nations’ economy therefore, arguably punishing innocent citizens for the crimes of their government or of a powerful faction. Legal punishment for genocidal acts can be prolonged or delayed due to the inability to find the individuals responsible (document D). The people who committed the violent acts against the innocent can go into hiding, change their names or move to another country before they are held accountable for their genocidal crimes. It becomes painfully apparent that the perpetrators of this hideous mass slaughter of people, are people not so different from anyone else, but people pushed to the brink of desperation. This leads to the uncomfortable question of whether any group of people would have acted in the same manner if they found themselves in a similarly difficult condition, and even more disturbing, whether a situation of equal magnitude cold happen yet again in the near future (document K). There are documented global genocides from…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Forgotten War Crimes
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Forgotten War Crimes

    biased by those who write it, and should not be taken as the whole truth; after…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials During The Holocaust
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials During The Holocaust

    The Nuremberg Trials is the general name for two sets of trials of Nazis involved in crimes committed during the Holocaust of World War II. The first, and most famous, began on November 20, 1945. It was entitled the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which tried the most important leaders of Nazi Germany. The second set of trials, for lesser war criminals, was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10, at the U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunals.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay About War Crimes
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay About War Crimes

    It is not just super important and/or famous people who commit these war crimes. “An 88-year-old man was charged in Germany for crimes committed in 1944 Nazi-occupied France” (Staff 7). They say that he shot 25 people as part of the firing squad. After that he burnt a church down killing a lot of people. These people may not be bad people themselves they may just be trained to be this way. "Most of the time, soldiers who commit atrocities are not sadists or 'bad apples'.... These soldiers are 'normal people' but they have been trained to obey orders with no discussion” (Staff 12). This 88 year old may not of wanted to do this but he may have been forced to by his commander but still. War crime are bad things that nobody should be trained to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Holocaust War Crimes

    War crimes trials are trials of persons charged with criminal violation of the laws and customs of war and related principles of international law. The records of the war crimes trials after World War 2 provide some of the most comprehensive formulations of the concept of war crimes. After the devastating amount of crime committed during World War 2, the law was the only way to seek justice on the accused war criminals.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    International Criminal Court Case Study
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    International Criminal Court Case Study

    The citizenship status of the criminals in this case are that they are citizens of The Federal Republic of Nigeria. The criminals do not have dual citizenship status, so they are not United States citizens and fall outside of the jurisdiction of the U.S. This will require The United States to bring the case to the International Criminal Court, where the Prosecutor will investigate and decide if charges will be brought. This limits and slows down the ability of The United States to apprehend, charge, and prosecute the criminal on their own by having to follow the process that the International Criminal Court has established. If the International Criminal Court denies the request, than the United States will not be able to pursue any charges.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuremberg Trials Holocaust
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nuremberg Trials Holocaust

    The Nuremberg Trials were a series of war trials against the Nazis for their crimes committed during the war. In reference to the article provided, only twenty-two war criminals were tried, to begin with, and after only fifteen were given serious punishments on the count of their respective charges, twelve given the death sentence, and three lifelong sentences in prison. The other seven were either acquitted or given ten to twenty years in prison. The results and the consequences of these trials do not nearly equate to the six million deaths of Jews and other victims in the Holocaust. Although these trials showed the power of obeying judicial laws in worldly events, hundreds of thousands of perpetrators got away with crimes, and this in no way fully shows justification for the Jewish…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jacque Derrida: On Forgiveness and Punishment
    • 2649 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jacque Derrida: On Forgiveness and Punishment

    September 3, 1939— World War Two had begun, and on this seminal day, the world plunged into a conflict that would redefine the workings of human association and justice. Surely, such a war of urgency and severity called into question (and for reform) the notion of a shared inter-state jurisprudence; marking also, for Jacque Derrida and his contemporaries, the first real instance of crime threatening the very notion of human morality—a “crime against humanity”. (Derrida, 29) Accordingly, discourse over a universal ethic or morality became problematized out of the absolute repulsion for the acts themselves, the weight of their monstrosity, which seemed to transcend all notions of a moral imaginable. The starting point here is as political as it is problematic, for the justifications of punishment—such as the need for protection against misconduct or rehabilitation of criminals—were no longer valid for punishing Nazi-related crimes. The atrocities of such a global conflict shattered all standard of justice; they were actions that could neither be punished sufficiently nor forgiven ordinarily: How might one (or a whole nation) respond? Who is the judge of these acts and on what grounds? What does such a notion of justice inscribe? Nevertheless, the rhetoric of forgiveness and punishment became prominent in the world as politicians and institutions alike began asking for forgiveness. For Derrida, it is enough to recall the Catholic Church’s plea for forgiveness of World War Two crimes, the plea of the Japanese Prime minister to Korea and China, the plea of Belgian government for neglecting to interfere with the massacre in Rwanda, and so on. On the grounds of these actions, accordingly, the notions of punishment and forgiveness are conflated by philosophers such as Hannah Arendt and Vladimir Jankelevitch: “Punishment has something in common with forgiveness, as it tends to put a limit on something that without…

    • 2649 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Controversy: The Nuremberg Trials
    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Controversy: The Nuremberg Trials

    At the meetings inTehran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945), the three major wartime powers, the United Kingdom, United States, and the Soviet Union, agreed on the format of punishment for those responsible for war crimes during World War II. France was also awarded a place on the tribunal. The legal basis for the trial was established by the London Charter, which was agreed upon by the four so-called Great Powers on 8 August 1945, [15] and which restricted the trial to "punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Influence Have The Nuremberg Trials Had On International Criminal Law?
    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Influence Have The Nuremberg Trials Had On International Criminal Law?

    The Nuremberg trials established that all people would be guarded by an international shield of justice and that even a President or Prime Minister would be held criminally responsible and punished for any crimes against humanity. But What Influence have the Nuremberg Trials had on International Criminal Law? The Nuremberg Principles and the idea of crimes against humanity not only affected the foundation of International War Crimes Tribunals, but its impact triggered numerous effects beyond creating a term to be used in military tribunals and for political purposes. According to the U.S. Department of state, almost 170 million civilians have been subjected to war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity over the last 100 years. The…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials
    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials

    More than half a century has passed since the end of World War Two and to this day it is still difficult to fully understand the severity of what was by far the most destructive war in human history. More than sixty million people were killed during World War Two and more than half of those were innocent town’s people. Among the dead were over six million Jews, which was two thirds of the total living race in Europe at the time. Beyond these general statistics were thousands of stories of crimes committed against soldiers and civilians. These crimes against humanity included cases of prisoners of war being murdered, sent to concentration camps and abuse as well as harmless civilians being rounded up and “exterminated” in death camps. At the end of the war, the Allies (USA, France, Britain, and Russia) felt that the Germans had to be held accountable for their inhumane actions and felt justified to punish the Nazis in an international court of law. On November twentieth, 1945 the Nuremberg trials began where twenty one of the top Nazi leaders where being prosecuted for their crimes during the war. All of the Nazi defendants were considered innocent until proven guilty and were allowed to defend themselves against the charges. Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders. Other defendants like Karl Doenitz and Albert Speer admitted their actions were wrong. Herman Goering believed his actions were for the greater good of Germany. After researching and gaining the knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials I believe that all six of these Nazi leaders are guilty and I think the judges decided on appropriate sentences for each of the accused. All six of these men helped lead the Germans to commit some of the most brutal crimes the world has ever seen and each of them had to face the consequences of their actions.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics