Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

War on Drugs

Better Essays
1691 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War on Drugs
War on Drugs in the U.S

The term “War on Drugs” was first used by U.S president Richard Nixon. The term is used to describe a campaign of prohibition, foreign military aid and military intervention undertaken by the United States government, with the help of other countries, and the aim to reduce the illegal drug trade. The war on drugs began in 1914 but became more popular four decades ago, on July 17, 1971. This war was declared by President Nixon who said “Drug abuse was public enemy number one!” One would think that war on drugs would have ignited because of the ghettoes or Woodstock festivals in Nixon’s era. In actuality this war began because of the addiction of soldiers who were fighting in Vietnam. President Nixon took action immediately and ordered urine testing for all US troops in Indochina. Nixon signed his war on drugs into law January 28, 1972, Nixon saying “I am convinced that the only way to fight this menace is by attacking it on many fronts”. Although Nixon took action, this wasn’t the first law that attempted to put a halt to drugs in the US. In 1920, the United States passed the National Prohibition Act along with the 18th Amendment, which prohibited the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol for consumption on a national level. The attempt to stop illegal drugs went on even before 1920 with the passing of the National Prohibition Act. The first U.S. law that restricted the distribution and use of certain drugs was the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914. The first local laws came as early as 1860. So even though Nixon declared this “War on Drugs”, it was escalating way before his presidency. The main goals & intent of the War is too discourage the production, distribution, and consumption of illegal drugs. In other words, the war wants to slow down or even stop the making & selling of illegal drugs. It would also like to put a stop to the usage of these illegal drugs. If the selling, usage & production of these illegal substances can be stopped, the United States feels as though this can make the country improve. Although the war on drugs may not have been put in effect because of blacks in the past, but as of today, most of the drug related crimes are committed indeed by blacks or lower class Americans. So another goal for this war in modern day would not only be too stop the illegal drugs but also too help the ones who are involved in these crimes. This war against drugs indeed is affecting the U.S. economically. Many believe that if you simply just stop the war and legalize these drugs, a substantial amount of money will be saved. United States spends approximately $600 per second on the war on drugs. Not only that, but it cost a total of $15.2 billion to lock up all of the nonviolent state and federal prisoners in 1998. That cost taxpayers a total of $24 billion to incarcerate the nonviolent prisoners. These numbers do not include the hidden costs like construction, operation of the prisons, and debt services on prison bonds which drive the cost it takes to incarcerate a prisoner from $20,224 to around $40,000. If the jailing of all of these prisoners actually stopped people from doing drugs than all the money might be worth it, however the drug problem still exists. The government’s anti-drug campaign failed in producing results, and has even encouraged more teenagers to try marijuana, costing taxpayers $929 million by 2002. This shows that the U.S. is putting large amounts of money towards the war on drugs but still have yet to see any results in the end. The Justice Department feels as though with this war against drugs we have “an overburdened justice system, a strained healthcare system, lost productivity, and environmental destruction. In 1970, proponents said beefed-up law enforcement could effectively seal the southern U.S. border and stop drugs from coming in. Since then, the U.S. used patrols, checkpoints, sniffer dogs, cameras, motion detectors, heat sensors, drone aircrafts and even put up more than 1,000 miles of steel beam, concrete walls and heavy mesh from California to Texas. None of that has worked to stop the drugs. The Office of National Drug Control Policy says about 330 tons of cocaine, 20 tons of heroin and 110 tons of methamphetamine are sold in the United States every year. Almost all of it brought in across the borders. Even more marijuana is sold, but it's hard to know how much of that is grown domestically, including vast fields run by Mexican drug cartels in U.S. national parks. The dealers who are caught have overwhelmed justice systems in the U.S... U.S. prosecutors declined to file charges in 7,482 drug cases last year, most because they simply didn't have the time. That's about one out of every four drug cases.
The U.S. has in recent years rounded up thousands of suspected associates of Mexican drug gangs, then turned some of the cases over to local prosecutors who can't make the charges stick for lack of evidence. The suspects are then sometimes released, deported or acquitted. The U.S. Justice Department doesn't even keep track of what happens to all of them. Mexican President Felipe Calderon says “if America wants to fix the drug problem, it needs to do something about Americans' unquenching thirst for illegal drugs.” Obama requested a record $15.5 billion for the drug war in 2011, about two thirds of it for law enforcement at the front lines of the battle: police, military and border patrol agents struggling to seize drugs and arrest traffickers and users. While only about $5.6 billion would be spent on prevention and treatment. The war on drugs is causing a lot of confusion in the justice system and it’s showing no signs of stabilizing. The U.S. looks disjointed and bamboozled when it comes to illegal drug prevention.

Although it may be true that drugs may be harmful to our economy, I think the legalization of all drugs, in the end, would be even more harmful to our nation as a whole. I do agree with the legalization of some recreational drugs, which I also think we could benefit economically from, however, the harm that many drugs cause, especially if easily attainable, would negatively effect our people as a society. However, with the recession that we’re in, with drugs illegal the U.S. does spend a massive amount of money to not see any type of progress. I feel as though the United States isn’t a country, it’s more of a business in my eyes and legalizing drugs would be a good business decision. As far as the country is concerned, legalizing illegal drugs will destroy the U.S. and cause harm to the environment and the people in it. I don’t believe this war on drugs is working, apparently because numbers don’t lie. Since the declaration of this war the only thing that has happened is; more money has been spent, drug trade and drug use has increased and the justice system has fallen apart. It seems as if the U.S. has only received negative results with this fight against illegal drugs. Therefore I believe this “war” is harming the U.S. Jails are being overpopulated, causing thousands of cases to be simply ignored. One out of these thousands of criminals being released could be a major problem in a community somewhere in the U.S., causing disruption and chaos. So is this War on Drugs really doing more harm than good? I believe so. I believe that the war on drugs is doing more harm than the drugs itself. The U.S. goes as far as doing police raids on people’s homes, which in some cases causes innocent people to be shot and killed. Also should drug abuse and possession really be the U.S. main focus? Most of the criminals in jail now are drug dealers, drug abusers or traffickers, yet the illegal drug crimes are still rising. I believe the U.S. has gotten so tied up with this war on drugs that they overlook the real crimes that are actually taking lives of innocent people. 20 people per hour are being arrested for drugs today, but we have maniacs out here going on massacres towards innocent civilians. Schools, movie theatres and other places people come to socialize are being gunned down and we are losing our elderly and children to guns. Yet the focal point is still on drugs. These drugs that we are trying to stop aren’t killing innocent four year old children in the 1st grade, guns and psychopaths are. So I feel as though, instead of putting all this time, effort, and trillions of dollars on trying to stop drugs that will never be put to an end, we should spend wisely on more important things that will protect are communities from losing innocent lives. Also these drug offenders are overcrowding the prisons because the U.S. tends to punish minor offenses with major punishments. So as these jails overpopulate, violence and death increases. Also deduction in sentences given to those being sentenced to or already in prison, which releases potentially dangerous offenders into society. As well as spread of disease and stress among the inmates and staff. Although these people are criminals, this is surely not healthy nor tolerable. The “War on Drugs” have been going on as early as the 1860’s and we still haven’t seen any positive in this fight. The U.S. has good intentions but has made a lot of bad decisions which is still causing disruption and disorder to this day. We can only wait and see how this war will end in the future. Will the U.S. come out victorious or will they fall to defeat and all the money and valuable time they have spent will all have been for nothing?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this chapter we also learn that The War on Drugs is more than a simple pronouncement; it is a complex system with multiple rules and regulations. It was authorized by the federal government, protected by the court system, and is executed by local law enforcement agencies. Hundreds of thousands of people are arrested every year for drug offenses, many through specially designed police tactics.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Drugs had invested large amounts of money into this policy when the money could have been spent more wisely. When President Nixon had declared the War on Drugs policy, he sought to defeat this enemy by fighting both the supply and demand parties. In doing this, Nixon launched a immense interdiction effort in Mexico also known to come the drug enforcement agency in 1973. That had meant that President Nixon required Mexico to regulate their farmers or people who grew marijuana. In result, this made the United States to spend millions of dollars closing off the borders (Stanford).…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Co Rentmeester uses this photo to describe the war on drugs during the 1960’s and the US population trying to cut drugs out. Early alterations to law were enacted when “The U.S. Congress first introduced mandatory prison terms for drug use and sale with the 1956 Narcotics Control Act” (Muscoreil).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English Comp Rough Draft

    • 1155 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the early 20th century, the drug market was not unregulated properly. Medical remedies that contained cocaine and heroin were distributed without prescription. Many consumers were unaware of these drugs and there effects. As a result policies that became known as the “War on Drug” where established. According to the War on Drugs History and Timeline Head (2012) stated, in 1914 the sale of cocaine and heroin were restricted in the Harrison Act of 1914. Head (2012) noted, in 1938 the government attempted to tax marihuana because it was seen as a gateway drug and because of its growing popularity in Mexican-American immigrants. This was known as the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Head (2012) says, in 1951 the Boggs Act was established to mandate federal sentences for possession of cocaine, opiates, and marijuana. Head (2012) noted, these federal penalties were increased in 1956 through the Narcotic Control Act of 1956. According to Fields (2009), in 1971 President Nixon and his administration implemented “The War on Drug” policy, which was the most relevant of all the narcotic policies. This is a commonly used term adapted by the media, which was aimed to define and reduce…

    • 1155 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society is known as the “Era of Color Blindness.” The war on drugs from the past to the future has not changed according to Michelle Alexander. The previous Jim Crowe law may be eradicated, but the law was brought back into effect by former president Ronald Reagan, known as the “War on Drugs.” The war on drugs that was put into effect by Ronald Reagan was targeted to lower class communities that had a violent crime rate. Focusing on the “Drug War” took light off a pressing issue known as racial caste in America by making harsher punishments for people who used or sold drugs. Even though the focus was in lower class communities it was also just as common in the middle to upper class communities. The “War on Drugs”…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history associated with drug criminalization in America contains more political motivators than concerns for public health and safety. The biggest politically motivated aspect to drug deterrence comes from Richard Nixon’s s war on drugs in 1971 which has created a system that discriminates against minority groups and has had little effect on deterring drug use. The war on drugs has thus far been notoriously noted for discriminating against people of color by pumping drugs into their communities and then imposing severe criminal consequences for drug possession, use, or distribution. In fact, one of Nixon’s aides John Ehrlichmen stated that the war on drugs was intended for the following:…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs utilized “tough on crime” rhetoric to create legislation that kept African-American men in a second-class role in American society. In the late 60’s, the Nixon administration was the first presidency to vocally declare a “war on drugs”: targeting drug use and distribution with new “tougher” policies and legislation punishing drug users. Although at the time many Americans praised the war on drugs for bringing awareness of drug use and its impact on crime, the war on drugs has been criticized for its annihilation of black communities. In an interview, Nixon aide John Ehrlichmann confessed that, "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon white house after that, had 2 enemies: the antiwar left and black people...by getting the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1970's Drug Abuse

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The 1960s drug use were characterized as “youthful rebellion.”It gained the attention of the President Nixon and therefore he established the D.E.A. through executive order and declared the war on drugs shortly thereafter. During the 1970s the D.E.A. focused most of its efforts on other drugs due to an assessment on the extent of drug abuse in the United States and it read,…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On June 17, 1971, President Richard Nixon committed what is arguably one of his most significant and lasting executive acts when he issued a special message to Congress regarding the growing drug abuse problem within the United States. Although this message was significant in many ways because of the public acknowledgment that the Federal Government was not doing enough to combat drugs and their associated ills, this message is mostly remembered as the origin of the term the War on Drugs. We are now over forty years removed from that “declaration of war,” and not only has the United States ' drug problem remained, it has grown to unthinkable proportions,…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Asset Forfeiture

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States Department of Justice 's Asset Forfeiture Program is a nationwide law enforcement program that has become a powerful weapon in the fight against crime. This involves removing the proceeds of crimes used by criminals to continue activity against society. Asset forfeiture has the impact of disrupting criminal activities that would continue to function if the only tool used was conviction and incarceration of certain individuals. While the Department of Justice program applies only to cases developed by enforcement officials in certain agencies of the Federal Government, state and local agencies may have similar programs and are not part of the federal program. (.http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/afp/)…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs was signed by former President Nixon with the intention of finding people who…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug Trafficking

    • 5118 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The War on Drugs is a campaign of prohibition and foreign military aid and military intervention undertaken by the United States government, with the assistance of participating countries, and the stated aim to define and reduce the illegal drug trade. This initiative includes a set of drug policies of the United States that are…

    • 5118 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays