Preview

Asset Forfeiture

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Asset Forfeiture
The United States Department of Justice 's Asset Forfeiture Program is a nationwide law enforcement program that has become a powerful weapon in the fight against crime. This involves removing the proceeds of crimes used by criminals to continue activity against society. Asset forfeiture has the impact of disrupting criminal activities that would continue to function if the only tool used was conviction and incarceration of certain individuals. While the Department of Justice program applies only to cases developed by enforcement officials in certain agencies of the Federal Government, state and local agencies may have similar programs and are not part of the federal program. (.http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/afp/)
Although the issue has sharply divided opinions, a prime example of how asset forfeiture has been used as a crime fighting tool, on both the federal, state and local levels, is the war on drugs.
On June 17th, 1971, President Richard Nixon declared war on drugs. He referred to the abuse of illegal substances as "public enemy number one in the United States". (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/cron/) US citizens were driven to save the future of this country by saving our people from the evils of illegal drugs. Citizens were accepting of most means deemed necessary to win this war. Because of this, asset forfeiture seemed like the right thing to do. Drug lords were amassing fortunes from the sale of illegal substances, which in turn were draining the finances of the citizens as well as doing them physical harm. It was time to turn

the tables and hit the drug lords in their pockets. With no other visible means of earning income, they lived in luxury. Expensive homes, vehicles, property, airplanes and cash would be seized by law enforcement agencies when it was suspected they were purchased with the proceeds of illegal drug sales. The case and items confiscated would then be used by the agencies to continue the war. This seems ideal



References: 1.http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/afp/ 2. Thirty years of america 's drug war: a chronology http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/cron/ 3. http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-108.ZD1.html 4. http://www.usdoj.gov/marshals/assets/assets.html 5. http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f081.htm 6. http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/496/california_supreme_court 7. http://www.www.unclefed.com/ForTaxProfs/irs-wd/2001/0106001.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A young man by the name of Joseph Rivers boarded a train headed from Los Angeles, California. Joseph brought with him the dream of becoming a video movie producer and a total of $16,000, that he and his mother had scraped together to help start this dream. At a stop in Albuquerque, New Mexico, two men boarded Joseph's train and seized his money, leaving him broke and without the funds to continue on with his trip or return home to Michigan. These men who committed this seemly unjust crime, were federal employees who according to the "civil-asset forfeiture" law, were well within their bounds to do so. (Friedersdorf, n.p.).…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this chapter we also learn that The War on Drugs is more than a simple pronouncement; it is a complex system with multiple rules and regulations. It was authorized by the federal government, protected by the court system, and is executed by local law enforcement agencies. Hundreds of thousands of people are arrested every year for drug offenses, many through specially designed police tactics.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Drugs had invested large amounts of money into this policy when the money could have been spent more wisely. When President Nixon had declared the War on Drugs policy, he sought to defeat this enemy by fighting both the supply and demand parties. In doing this, Nixon launched a immense interdiction effort in Mexico also known to come the drug enforcement agency in 1973. That had meant that President Nixon required Mexico to regulate their farmers or people who grew marijuana. In result, this made the United States to spend millions of dollars closing off the borders (Stanford).…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a significant number of laws implemented polices that governs the procedures of assets forfeiture. Some of the laws implemented are the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), the Money Laundering Control Act (MCLA), Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which mostly concerns criminal asset forfeitures. In dealing with drug offenders, Congressed passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and Control Act of 1970. This Act is a form of civil asset forfeitures that presents the government with the authority power to “seize and forfeit illegal drugs, manufacturing and storage equipment, and conveyances used to transport drugs (“Police Briefing”, 1999).” This law covers the seizing of the alleged drug dealer’s property, home, and vehicles used to transport illegal substances, such as marijuana and cocaine.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society is known as the “Era of Color Blindness.” The war on drugs from the past to the future has not changed according to Michelle Alexander. The previous Jim Crowe law may be eradicated, but the law was brought back into effect by former president Ronald Reagan, known as the “War on Drugs.” The war on drugs that was put into effect by Ronald Reagan was targeted to lower class communities that had a violent crime rate. Focusing on the “Drug War” took light off a pressing issue known as racial caste in America by making harsher punishments for people who used or sold drugs. Even though the focus was in lower class communities it was also just as common in the middle to upper class communities. The “War on Drugs”…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In many ways, the so-called war on drugs was a war on communities of color, a war on black communities, a war on Latino communities.” This statement was made by Angela Davis who appeared in the documentary, 13th. Next to unfair jail sentences, the war on drugs was the next hot topic of the documentary. 13th recognizes that the Nixon administration began the cycle of criminalizing African-Americans struggling with drug addictions, rather than increasing availed resources for treatment and rehabilitation. 13th also recognizes the United States’ 40th president, Ronald Reagan, to be the cause of this…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem began in the 1970s. The U.S imposed stricter penalties for drug-related crimes, but was met with…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nixon also made drug related crimes federal offenses. Convictions for mere possession resulted in felony prison sentences and more serious crimes like dealing or trafficking came with even longer sentences. However, the longer sentences imposed to lower crime had insubstantial effect on arrest rates and did not deter recidivism. Minimum sentences directed toward drug users developed as a result of Nixon’s initiative to significantly reduce crime rates by incarcerating drugs users. This initiative, coined by Nixon as the “War on Drugs,” failed its main purpose of eliminating drug use and significantly reducing the number of drug users.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona law enforcement has abused civil forfeiture by seizing large amounts of property. Table 1 represents the total amount of state forfeiture funds received by law enforcement for the years 2000 to 2014. Arizona law enforcement has forfeited approximately $412 million in property. On average, forfeitures in Arizona are yielding law enforcement $27 million per year (Carpenter et al., 2015, p. 50). Civil forfeiture incentivizes law enforcement in Arizona to seize property because there is no limit to the amount of forfeiture funds that can go towards salaries (Keller, et al., 2012, p. 1 &7). Graph 1 offers a visual representation of the expenditures made by law enforcement in Arizona by type. From the years, 2000 to 2011 majority or 31% of…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The increased use of for-profit privatized prisons in the United States has created a system of mass incarceration due to compromised motivation for these institutions to maximize profits. Over the last four and a half decades, the United States has experienced a surge in the incarceration rates. In 2013, 1,598,780 people occupied state or federal prisons compared to 196,429 in 1970 (“Incarceration Generation” 1). This rise in prison population may be a result of harsher penalties and legislation on non-violent crimes. For instance, President Nixon officially declared the “War on Drugs” in 1973 and endorsed this through the creation of the Drug Enforcement Administration's (“Incarceration Generation” 1). The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, passed…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a significant amount of court cases that show the system is corrupt when it comes to civil forfeiture, but is it a procedural issue or is it “policing for profit?” In 2014, Tan Nguyen left the casino with $50,000 in winnings. He was pulled over by a Nevada Deputy Lee Dove for speeding, and after a search of his vehicle his money was confiscated for no drug related reason, except for the amount of cash. Nguyen had to file an “innocent owner” claim to get his winning back from the county. Humboldt County settled with Nguyen for the full amount being reimbursed, but also received $10,000 to cover attorney fees. This can be considered a possibility of procedural issues in Humboldt County, but then again Deputy Dove may be “policing for profit.” Nguyen’s attorney has a shared settlement when Matt Lee’s $2,400 was confiscated during a routine traffic stop that also resulted in an imaginary link to drugs.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass incarceration is often cited as one of the main pillars of institutional racism in America due to the disproportional amount of minorities incarcerated yearly. The war on drugs is widely acknowledged as one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and its devastating effects on the black community. On June 17, 1971, Richard Nixon officially declared drugs “America's public enemy number one” and thus began the colloquialized War on Drugs (Alexander 16). Seeing as Nixon’s presidency shortly succeeded the Civil Rights Act, Nixon exploited the raw frustration of the remaining segregationists in his campaign for the presidency. Years later, Reagan took office and his supposed drive to “crack down on crime” had an implicit focus on black communities…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with you that asset forfeiture can be a good thing. However, I worry when you say it should be looked at with common sense. It appears now day’s common sense is not all that common and poor judgement calls in general. I would propose better training when it comes to asset forfeiture allowing for more informed officers making better informed decisions.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays