Preview

Was America right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1580 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was America right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan
Was America right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan? Having explored the evidence I believe that America was justified in dropping the first atomic bomb but not the second. The reasons as to why I believe this will be explored in this essay. Near the end of WW2, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. The first on the 6th of August 1945 on Hiroshima and the second on the 9th August on Nagasaki. This was carried out under the order of Harry S. Truman, the American president at the time. In Europe the war was mainly over, but in Asia Japan still prevailed. America was contemplating a full scale invasion of Japan following the attack on Pearl Harbour however this was not executed as the atomic bombs were dropped instead. The main reason as to why the first bomb can be justified but not the second is that although Japan was seeking a negotiated peace, they were not prepared to agree to the Potsdam Declaration as they were against the terms provided. This suggests that something had to be done otherwise Japan was not going to surrender and the terms were not going to be changed, therefore in order to achieve peace and to prevent the continuance of the war, the bomb on Hiroshima was necessary and can be justified.
Furthermore, the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima which was the location of a Japanese army base and was not specifically aimed to kill civilians as it was only meant as a warning. Although Hiroshima did kill approximately 66,000 people, as it was the first testing of an atomic bomb in history, the Americans did not understand the full impact that this bomb would have and did not expect it to harm as many civilians as it did. It can be argued that if America did not understand the implications that the bomb would have, they shouldn’t have dropped it. However, I believe that as Japan was not prepared to surrender and as the war was dragging on, the bomb on Hiroshima was the right course of action to undertake as ultimately it killed less people than it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why Did Truman Choose Ww2

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Japan surrendered and dropped the first bomb at Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, 73,000 people ended up being killed. After the second bomb was dropped September 2nd at Nagasaki, it killed 37,500 people. The second reason is President Truman saving resources. By sending the atomic bomb, President Truman saved lots of resources. If he didn’t send the bomb, he would have had to keep sending out fuel and oil to keep machinery and weapons running.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. On August 9, 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. Thousands died instantaneously while many more died from radiation exposure from the bombs. The use of the atomic weapons was unnecessary due to the fact the Japan’s military was greatly weakened and ready to surrender, thousands of innocent lives were sacrificed simply for political power, and there could have been alternatives to cease the war.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though the bomb killed many inocent civilians were killed, I believe that it was necessary because with out the dropping the war would have gone on, and more lives would have been taken on both sides. The Japanese had no means to stop in the war but the dropping of the bomb showed that the US had no means to stand down either and we would take the actions necessary to protect ourselves and make sure that the Germans and Japanese made no advances. I believe it was…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In WW2, the bomb wasn't the smartest thing America did. As they hurt many innocent Japanese people in the process. If President Harry Truman and the military thought out there plan to end the war. They could've ended it much more peacefully. If America were really wanted to drop the bomb, they should've dropped it on Germany, as they were the next threat during the…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we look back on this historical event, many would argue if dropping the atomic bomb was the right choice. Strategically and politically, Truman was justified in dropping the bomb, but morally it wasn’t the right decision. America didn’t enter the war until December 7th, 1941, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The US had been trying to stay out, but many knew their entrance…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States dropped the first atomic bomb on, a medium-sized Japanese city, Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. President Truman’s decision of dropping the atomic bombs was absolutely necessary since it saved lives of millions of the Americans and the Japanese as well. This attack on Pearl Harbor was just an example of what could have happened…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Europe, the war with Germany was over but Japan was still fighting. So the U.S could concreted on the war with Japan. The U.S had atomic bombs ready and a decision had to be made; should they sent ground forces to invade Japan or should they bomb Japan. So on August 1945 the U.S decided to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and this created some controversy. Some people though it was a good idea to bomb Japan, while others say that 200,000 innocent people were killed. I believe that bombing the two cities was the right decision because it did save the lives of many U.S soldiers and it ended World War II.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays