Preview

Was Aristotle Right in Thinking Virtues Were Relative?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Aristotle Right in Thinking Virtues Were Relative?
Was Aristotle right in thinking virtues were relative?

Aristotle at the age of 17 was sent to the intellectual capital of the Greek world, Athens and there joined the Academy and studied under Plato. He then later in life set up the Lyceum school and taught there. He argues that whenever we do something, we do it to gain an end, and that the ultimate ends of all ends is the chief good, the greatest good. He believed that actions are directed towards an aim, he uses the example that someone gets in the morning to go to work and they go to work because they want to earn a living and have a good career; they want earnings and a career success so that they can live life well. Aristotle was a relativist who didn’t believe in universal forms unlike his teacher Plato. He bought about a theory called the “Golden mean” were it says that humans should stay in-between two extremes, which is called “virtuous character”, where a human should show virtuous mean not excess or deficiency. An example used in his twelve moral virtues is courage, where the deficiency is cowardice and the excess of this virtue is rashness.
Virtue theory is different to any other theory. Instead of looking at what the right thing to do is, it is principally concerned with the idea of the human character and it asks how you can be a better person. However, most theories concentrate on defining principle by which we should act. Virtue theory is about defining good people and the qualities that make them good. Virtue theory is opposite to the utilitarianism approach, it puts the right character before the right behaviour, we should be much less concerned with actions and consequences, and much more concerned with the character of the moral agent.
Relativism is the view that there are no moral absolutes, so that our moral judgements relate to upbringing and society. Philosophers have sought to justify relativism culturally. Cultural relativism explains that moral virtues vary between societies.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle accepts the individual choices and experiences of people and was more concerned with virtue ethics. He doesn't have an idea of free will. Along with Socrates, Aristotle believes that someone may know what the best outcome is and still do wrong, but draws the line between happiness and moral virtue. This includes depression and unhappiness. The world has moral meaning. He explains that moral virtue does not mean the end of life. His theory is that happiness is the end of life, which comes together with reason. Virtue is a state of personality that has to do with someone’s choice.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue theory differs from the two other normative theories, utilitarianism and deontology; it focuses primarily more on the individual, and their characteristics; whereas the other two focus more on your actions. Virtue ethics encompasses how we should be and which virtues we should acquire. Deontology and utilitarianism is an expression of what we should do, and this differs from personal yearnings and feelings.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context. Cultural relativists believe that all cultures are worthy in their own right and are of equal value. Diversity of cultures, even those with conflicting moral beliefs, is not to be considered in terms of right and wrong or good and bad. Some believe that morality is relative to culture, but some believe that argument is invalid. Some also argue that there is such a thing as moral isolationism.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The virtue theory deals with the individual, the expectation is to “cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do (Boylan, 2009).” It deals with the character of an individual. Qualities of a virtuous person would be considered an upstanding, trustworthy, dependable, and honest. In contrast an unethical person would be selfish, unreliable, devious, or careless.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue theory, also known as virtue ethics, focuses more so on the character of a person rather than the rules and consequences of specific acts. What this essentially means is that the primary focus is whether or not the person acting ethically is a person who upholds high morals and virtues, in turn expressing “good character” (Garrett, 2005). Rules, intent, consequences and outcome are not necessarily irrelevant; however, the emphasis of virtue theory is primarily on a person’s character, their virtues, and their expression of good intentions (Garrett, 2005).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue ethics is the ethical theory that best describes my views. The biggest different between myself and a straight edge ethical theorist would be that I judge a person for every situation, while always assuming that their morals are still intact. In this case, values help to describe what is important to a person’s life. Virtue ethics…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics 316

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virtue Theory relates to the pursuit of excellence in everything you do. As one commercial put it, “Be all that you can be” (U.S. Army 1981). One must have the idea that if they want to maximize their greatest potential, they must work hard to produce it. To the Utilitarian this may appear selfish, but self-discipline and self-determination is key to achieving the goal.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theory of virtue is one theory that is quite different from the rest. In the…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person is born into this world with the opportunity to grow and realize his or her true potential. Aristotle believes that this is something everyone should work to achieve. No one intentionally wants to fail at being a human being and so people do whatever they can to continue to flourish. Aristotle’s philosophy favors ethical egoism because he believes that everything people do is in order to secure their own happiness in the end.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue and Relativism

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Virtue Ethics

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virtue is the moral character of a person. A virtuous person will try to live up to a high moral standard. A person of virtue is who thought to be kind they we would expect this person to be kind in all different situations. This ethical theory is different from other theories because virtue does not focus on duties and rules or the consequences of an action of helping…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays