Preview

Was Bismarck’s foreign policy 1871-1890 a success ? 

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Bismarck’s foreign policy 1871-1890 a success ? 
« Was Bismarck’s foreign policy 1871-1890 a success ? »

Otto von Bismarck's foreign policy held certain aims through these years and Bismarck changed his foreign policy due to the circumstances so that he could keep and achieve these objectives. These choices made by Bismarck had mixed success and failure since he had many goals but failed at achieving some of them, but at the end of it all Bismarck had achieved his main goal, which was the preservation of the new German state.

Bismarck's first idea to maintain peace in Germany was the Dreikeiserbund, which was an alliance between the emperors of Austria, Russia and Germany. This alliance was also made to isolate France, since Germany could never be an ally of France because of the German occupation of Alsace-Lorraine. The Dreikeiserbund was created on the 22nd of October 1873 but it did not hold as Germany rejected ideas for a Russo-German military pact shortly after its creation. Bismarck had preserved peace and stopped the chance of him making a choice between Russia and Austria however France had escaped isolation. France thought that Bismarck was going to establish a pre-emptive strike on France. This made England and Italy express serious concern and France had then escaped. The Dreikeiserbund fulfills many of Bismarck’s aims, therefore it can be partly seen as a success even if it ended, but then started again in 1887.



Then, Bismarck led the Congress of Berlin to balance the interests of Russia, Austria-Hungary and Britain, and to establish peace in the Balkans, which was a crucial goal to achieve for Germany. This Congress’s results were conidered as a great achievement in peacemaking, however most of the countries who participated in this Congress were not completely satified. The Ottoman Empire, called at the time « the sick man of Europe » became more vulnerable than it was before, and tensions developped in Bosnia and Herzegovina since Austria gained a lot of territory thanks to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890).…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Devotion from the person to the ambition of their nation is a cause of how the war began. Nationalism within a country so strong, that it causes the collapse of the peace, or the fire to the gunpowder. When royalty is greeted in public, it should be with open arms, warm spirits, and hope of a new beginning. Though, with the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, of Austria, this statement becomes a spurious claim. The trusting gesture of Franz to the people he would have soon ruled, soon became the death of him. The Congress of Berlin in 1878 Austria-Hungary had been given the right to administer Bosnia and Herzegovina on the western border of Serbia. Thousands of Slavs lived in that area, but in 1908, Austria-Hungary annexed these ideas outright, which infuriated the Serbs, who hoped to absorb all the Slavs into their nation. Serbia may have been small and insignificant to Austria-Hungary; however, the one small…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government in Germany represented a new kind of conservatism in the nineteenth-century Europe that was willing to change traditional conservative beliefs to better lead modern society. Bismarck was a realpolitik, which means he chose political alliances that would boost Prussia and Germany significantly, rather than morally preferable ones. Bismarck was able to successfully unify and govern the German Empire because he believed in the application of modern-day tactics and the idea that in order to grow an empire, you must be willing to put its’ needs first. In 1869, Bismarck showcased this belief when he issued a legislation that granted “all restrictions on citizenship of civil rights based on differences in religious confession…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Metternich, Foreign Minister of Austria from 1815-1848, and Bismarck of Prussia from 1862-1890, were the same in their foreign policy goals with their conservative beliefs that the ideas of liberalism and revolution must be crushed, however Metternich often engaged in war while Bismarck only participated in war if completely necessary. Bismarck may have started with more liberal views but became an extreme conservative, to the extent that he had to find a way to appeal to the liberal Parliament in 1863. Although he supported a strong monarchy he managed…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation, provocation, disdain, and most of all he was a man of change. Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation or the changing of one’s surroundings to better fit their needs and desires. Otto Von Bismarck used his ability to manipulate others so that he could help Germany (Prussia), develop a standing in Europe that would make them the number one power in Europe. Otto Von Bismarck was also a man of provocation or the pushing of others for the intent of angering them to take action for or against something. When Otto Von Bismarck was devising his 3 step plan for Germany, he needed to start a war with France but he needed them to make the first move, to do this, he sent France a very mean letter that was…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To some Germans Bismarck was the best and grandest of Germany's statesmen. They say he alone unified the nation and rose it to the greatness. To some others he was a distorted politician who misused his powers and let Germany to dictatorship. Bismarck was a junker who withheld and chose as his prime minister. Bismarck was great at using realpolitik as his style of political views and ways.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays