Preview

Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?
WAS HITLER A WEAK DICTATOR?

Introduction

The question of whether Hitler was master in the Third Reich or a ‘weak dictator' is one of the central debates amongst historians of Nazi Germany. It is not necessary to spend too much time here outlining the debate, as this information can easily be found elsewhere (see, for example, the excellent chapter on this subject in Ian Kershaw's The Nazi Dictatorship). Broadly speaking, historians who have participated in this debate can be located on a scale ranging from the ‘intentionalists' at one extreme to the ‘functionalists' on the other.

The ‘intentionalists' include historians such as Norman Rich, Joachim Fest and Karl Dietrich Bracher. What these historians have in common is their stress on the centrality of Hitler's person and ideology in Nazi Germany. According to Rich, for example: ‘The point cannot be emphasised too strongly. Hitler was master in the Third Reich.'

The ‘structuralist' school of thought (sometimes called the ‘functionalist' school) includes historians such as Tim Mason, Hans Mommsen and Martin Broszat. Though structuralists do not deny the importance of Hitler's role, they tend to stress the fact that he exercised his power within certain structures that shaped, and in some ways placed limits upon, his policies. Some structuralists also argue that Hitler was indecisive, influenced by his cronies, and divorced from the day-to-day running of the Third Reich. Hans Mommsen even goes so far as to argue that Hitler was in some ways a ‘weak dictator'.

In order to try and establish which school of thought comes closer to the truth, we shall look at two key issues on which structuralists and intentionalists have clashed, namely the ‘polycratic state' and the Nazi economy.

The polycratic state

Structuralist historians often stress the chaotic structure of the Third Reich. They argue that Nazi Germany was in no sense a monolithic state. On the contrary, it was a chaotic collection of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Working to the Fuhrer

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kershaw examines Hitler’s reign during the 1930s in his essay “Hitler.” The term “working towards the Fuhrer” is instrumental to Kershaw’s depiction of Hitler during the Third Reich. According to Kershaw, through “‘working towards the Fuhrer’, initiatives were taken, pressures created, legislation instigated- all in ways which fell into line with what were Hitler’s aim, and without the dictator necessarily having to dictate.”1 Kershaw argues that the radical action that leduo222222222222 to policy formation was often times provoked from below, and not by Hitler himself.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Final Solution is the most controversial topic of German History as its origination is not clean cut, whilst it would be simple to place emphasis on Hitler and his World View for the destruction of all Jewry there are other factors such as WW2 which must be taken into consideration in analysis of the Final Solution. Other factors include the polarised view of a lack of formal mechanisms and coherent policy, both of which were fuelled by an honest desire to pursue the will of the Fuhrer to commit, as described by Layton ‘The darkest deed of the Third Reich.’ Throughout this essay it will be assessed as to whether or not this plan for the systematic annihilation arose from the chaotic nature of the regime.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr however, rightly agreed with the view that the whole structure of Government was an ‘authoritarian anarchy’. There was a struggle for power between different groups; this was defined by the idea of dualism. State and party institutions were working towards a common goal; however, they were fighting for total control over that area, this could be found within the civil service. It could be said that the ill-defined roles of each individual in the Nazi regime, was something that Hitler had intended on, however, by no one having a set role in society, this would lead to a state of utter confusion and disarray. On the other hand, evidence has shown that unclear positions within the Nazi state improved efficiency. Bormann a bureaucrat at the heart of the administration, despite not having a clear position of power within the party managed to increase the efficiency of the state. He set of the Department for Internal Affairs, which co-ordinated what the party did and the Department for State Affairs, which defined how the party was to be involved in the state. Both these lead to increased party efficiency within Germany, proving that Hitler’s ideas benefited the regime rather than leading to chaos.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Intentions and the “Final Solution”” by Berel Lang captures the Intentionalist and Functionalists views of the “master plan” that Hitler calls the “Final Solution”. The “Final Solution” was what Hitler constructed and planned to carry out the Holocaust. The author makes it clear that this act of violence was carried out by only one person, and that person being Adolf Hitler, and that it was certainly not an accident. Lang creates a biased comparison of what different views of the “Final Solution” were after everybody met for the Wannsee Conference. Intentionalist believe that this was something that Hitler was planning the whole time, while functionalist…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like the intentionalists, the functionalists did have some stronger arguments. Mommsen refers to the Holocaust as a “political process which eventually led to the conclusion that there was no way out but to kill the Jews in Auschwitz and elsewhere.” He further put forth his belief “this did not come into being before the second half of 1941.” Intentionalists cannot counter this claim easily, “No one has uncovered any SS plans for the relocation of Jews in the Soviet interior,” intentionalist Richard Breitman admitted “in contrast, plans for extermination camps were already being implemented in the early fall of 1941.” Just as damningly Rudolf Hoss’s own testimony indicates his orders regarding the Final Solution came directly from Himmler in the summer of 1941. This points in favor of a non-intentionalist argument, though it does not necessarily strengthen the functionalist idea that this was a bureaucratic process, as Himmler, a high ranking member of the inner circle, gave the order.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mason himself was a functionalist and insisted that Hitler’s will should not carry the maid burden of explanation. Mason, amongst other functionalist historians argues in his book that multiple social and economic agencies resulted in a chaotic and reactionary atmosphere, amidst which, pragmatists within the Nazi regime saw potential to instigate genocidal…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The participants in the studies view the years of the Third Reich as positive and stable, free from political upheaval and economic uncertainty. “The Guaranteed pay packet, order, KdF [Kraft durch Freude, Strength through Joy, the National Socialist leisure organization] and the smooth running of the political machinery…Thus ‘National Socialism’ makes them think merely of work, adequate nourishment, KdF and the absence of ‘disarray’ in political life”. (Bessel, p. 97)…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith, Woodruff D. The Ideological Origins of Nazi Imperialism. New York: Oxford UP, 1986. Print.…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    If Hitler was good at anything, it was manipulation. Furthermore, the genocide experienced in the Holocaust could very well have been avoided if a leader as manipulative and irrational as Hitler was removed from the picture. As such, Hitler played a pivotal role in the progression of the Holocaust and he is worthy of blame above all others.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi and the Holocaust

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout Adolf Hitler’s life, he developed many different goals and ideas, which later grew and made who he came to be. Hitler began his life wanting to become an artist, however, that didn’t get him anywhere. Many theorist people believed Hitler grew up in an anti-semantic home. Everything Hitler attempted to accomplish didn’t occur and therefore held the Jews responsible. For example, when Hitler failed to be accepted in The Vienna School of Art, he blamed that on the population of the Jews. Thus, volunteering for service in the German army and learning all that was needed to know about politics and important…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was longing for a united nation with a stable economy. The Nazi party, lead by Adolf Hitler, came to power. "And then there is another fundamental error: they have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference or how great a difference there is between the conception 'national' and the word 'dynastic' or 'monarchistic.' They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as Nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the National Idea was identical with petty everyday political views. They ought day by day to din into the ears of the masses: 'We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Hitler was the leader of the Third Reich, the functionalists believed that the ‘road to Auschwitz’ was characterized by an indirect unplanned path that was defined by cumulative radicalization of the Nazis due to the prevalence of chaotic decision-making processes that were a major feature of the polycratic system of…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The two schools of thought in contemporary studies of the holocaust origins fall under the categories of functionalism and intentionalism. Functionalists believe that Hitler was an anti-Semite yet held no permanent orchestrated plan to eliminate the Jewish race, rather that the vast genocide of the Holocaust was a result of the continual German anti-Semitic policy changing to become increasingly radical and the failure of the Jewish deportation plans. In contrast Intentionalist Historians generally agree that Hitler did have a fixed long-term plan to kill the Jews from the beginning of his political career and that he was the dominant and driving authority force which encouraged the mass slaughter which occurred throughout the Holocaust. The…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Antisemitism in Mein Kampf

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mein Kampf is a book of two volumes authored by Adolf Hitler. The first volume was written whilst dictated to Rudolph Hess and Emile Maurice in Landsberg prison where Hitler was sentenced to following the failure of an attempted coup d’état of the Bavarian government in 1924. Mein Kampf is significant amongst historiography as it is thought to be an insight into the mind of Adolf Hitler. This book is not only autobiographical but full of memoires and political ideologies, which have subsequently sparked debate as to whether this piece of primary historical evidence can be regarded as the blue-print for Hitler’s future ambitions. An intentionalist view by Historians’ such as Lucy Dawidowicz, argues that the Holocaust was the result of Hitler’s long term plan, whereas the functionalist perspective by Historians’ such as Christopher Browning is of the result of a competing agents within the Reich to answer the Jewish question. Chapter 11 of Mein Kampf: Nation and Race, shows to comprehend with the intentionalist interpretation that this did indeed set the foundation for Holocaust as a propaganda medium.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a totalitarian state, however, only to an extent due to differing perspectives Nazi Germany did not fit the universal criteria of what constitutes totalitarianism. It is unarguably necessary that Germany was ran by a single party, had absolute control over mass communication & media, had a systematic terror & police control as well as total control over the army. However, many have argued that Nazi Germany was not totalitarian as it did not have total control over the economy and Hitler’s role in regime of the Nazism played a significant role in whether or not Germany was totalitarian. Views of Hitler’s role in the Nazi state concerning whether or not Germany was totalitarian…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays