Preview

Was Robespierre A Hero Or A Villain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Robespierre A Hero Or A Villain
Maximilien de Robespierre: A Hero and a Villain
Leader. Murderer. Hero. Villain. Your thoughts on Maximilien Robespierre all depend on your point of view and your experiences. Some people seeked revenge against him while others backed him to his death. The reason for all these mixed feelings was a series of events that changed not only France but their revolution as well. Maximilien de Robespierre was a French politician and influential figure of the french Revolution. He was in control of France in the 1790’s and was a key figure of the french revolution. Under his rule France experienced some of the most gruesome acts in history in the execution of thousands by guillotine until he was brought to death in 1794.

Born to young but successful
…show more content…

With many fresh ideas in his head he headed out for the real world.

Using what he learned in college and his great speaking techniques he began giving lectures about democracy and other enlightenment ideas to listeners and followers. As hisideas gained popularity so did he, and he was elected to the Third Estate of the Estates General. Representing the greater population he argued for equal rights and fair rules on taxation. More and more the other two estates began taking note of his points and countering them, but he had the people of France backing him up.

Due to unfair and excessive taxes to the government the Third Estate of France was left with very little money for food and other necessities. After having all they could take the lower class, led by Robespierre went to the king and begged for equal taxation laws, but the king simply ignored them and disregarded the whole situation. This disregard for the interest of the people led to a string of events backed by Robespierre including The Storming of the Bastille, The Declaration of the Rights of Man, and The March on Versailles (Britannica 118). Maximilien had got what he wanted; a revolution to fight for the rights of the
…show more content…

Kee 3
This even included the execution of King Louis XVI of France and his wife during a time called The Great Fear. After this event Maximilien Robespierre rose into full power over what was left of France and killed all of the Nobles and Clergymen of the countryside. Besides that under newly passed laws any person even suspected of disagreeing with or threatening the revolution was put to death by the guillotine, an act deemed necessary by the revolutionaries in order to create a successful new government (Britannica 346).

As the terror escalated the revolution began turning on Maximilien. So he gave lectures and speeches defending his position on the executions, but to no prevail. He was soon declared an outlaw and arrested, along with twelve followers (Britannica 346). The next day they were all guillotined without a trial and buried in a common


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HUM 112 Quiz 3 me

    • 349 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why did the French Tribunal order execution of Maximilien Robespierre, one of the leaders of the revolution and new government?…

    • 349 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ French Revolution

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the revolution, the peasants made sure they were heard. They started killing nobles; the guillotine was made making the death sentence faster and cheaper. Thousands were killed with the guillotine including Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, his wife. The time after this was known as the Reign of Terror, when Maximilien Robespierre took over. During this period of famine and panic, the peasants were finally heard and released from feudalism. This French Revolution changed a lot helping commoners, but not the other people. It actually created a bigger war killing thousands of people. The people were…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The execution of Louis XVI marked the beginning of the 18 month period of the French Revolution that has come to be called ‘The Reign of Terror’”(49). It was led by no other than Robespierre, in an attempt to start a new government, which proceeded to execute large numbers of people. The 18 months was a blood pouring event during the French Revolution. These events were unnecessary and the whole Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was a sin to kill, they went against what other through and what was right, and they went beyond what was necessary.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many were victims of mistaken identity or were falsely accused. The guillotine was the “engine” of the Terror. Members of the Convention soon turned on the Committee of Public Safety. Robespierre was arrested and executed.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, people have overthrown governments for a variety of social, political, and economic reasons. When basic needs aren't met and natural rights aren't protected, people start to question the government's morals and ideals. in the 18th century, the citizens of France were inspired by the Enlightenment ideas of Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau, as well as the success of the American Revolution. As a reaction to their unfair treatment, the people of the Third Estate rebelled against the government, and eventually, after many deaths and changes of power, the people finally received their much-deserved rights. There were many well-justified causes of the French Revolution, and although many horrible effects presented themselves, the resulting…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were people who wanted the power that was implicated in being a part of the Committee of Public Safety and others who wanted the Terror to end and were completely against the Revolutionary government as a whole vying for the removal of Robespierre. Others thought it would be best for him to be removed in order to keep themselves alive. In order for this to happen, they began to collect charges against him, one them being the Law of 22 Prairial. Robespierre was arrested and refused a hearing before his peers. He was executed on July 8, 1794.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XVI took power when his father, who was the previous ruler, died. Many people did not agree with this because he as a young man at the time and had no experience running a country. King Louis XVI enjoyed the riches that came with being King but he did not have any experience and made random decisions that hurt the common people of the country which made France a target for other countries. King Louis XVI did not know what he was doing, obviously, but he controlled everything. The French people had no say in how their country was ran because the King paid no attention to them. France wanted him executed. Document F shows an image of when King Louis XVI was killed by the guillotine. The image also shows Maximilien Robespierre, another inspiring figure of the American Revolution, holding the king’s head while everybody else was happy and laughing as it was an enjoyable event. This event happened on January 21, 1793 long after King Louis XVI started ruling, so France was still incredibly poor.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren't necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people's enemies by terror. Robespierre also mentions that a popular government in revolution evolves from virtue and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: "virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless." He says, "the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself." In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of despotic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot may govern by terror his brutalized subjects and subdue by terror the enemies of liberty. Even though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and ruthlessness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and ultimately led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn't necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face more…

    • 366 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Severed heads, numerous bodies, and constant fear in the streets, does the Reign of Terror sound justified to you? The Reign of Terror was an immense turning point in the French revolution and lasted for 18 months. During this time period 20,000 people were executed using the guillotine causing a lot of bloodshed. The reign of terror was unacceptable and cannot be justified for many reasons.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5, 1793, to July 27 1794. It was a civil and a foreign war, where the government decided to terrify the people of France, and to take harsh consequences against those who were against the revolution, like the nobles and priests. The government forced terror in the hearts of the French. Approximately 40,000 people die during the Terror. About 15% were the nobles and clergy. Another 15% were the middle class. The rest were peasants. The brain of the terror is the Guillotine. It was blade, which dropped fast, and the victim would not feel pain. Dr. Joseph Guillotine created the Guillotine, and it quickly became a symbol of horror in the Reign of Terror. Another method used in the period of Terror was The Breaking Wheel. The Breaking wheel was the famous execution before the Guillotine. The Breaking Wheel was a torture device where they attach a person to the wheel and rotate the wheel were his bones break and the person gets dehydrated. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. Jean-Baptiste Carrier put his victims into vessels with trapdoors for bottoms and to sink them in the Loire River.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of terror

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    20,000-40,000 people died from the guillotine alone. This loss adds to the evidence that people of France did not want the Reign of Terror, therefore it is not justified. The people of France might have been more okay with the Reign of Terror if it did not contradict France’s ideas of rights and actions. Originally it seemed that France was doing the right thing to hire spies in neighborhoods, also known as the “Committee of Public Safety” .However, the original idea of things being safer for citizens was soon shot down.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was caused because the Third Estate’s desire to have liberty and also be equal. The way France’s social class was made it was just a matter of time before the revolution would start. The economic classes of France were made up of three estates. The first estate was the church, or clergy, the second estate was the nobles, and the third estate was made up of the peasants, the uneducated, and lawyers. France’s economic system made the third estate pay the most taxes and the clergy members didn’t have to pay taxes, and for the nobles they paid little or no taxes at all. People who are starving and can barely afford to survive can only pay so much taxes before they stop paying their taxes.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre states, “What is the goal toward which we are heading? The peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality.” (Bienvenu, p. 1, para.1) The laws that have been passed by the royalty that are meant to bring long lasting righteousness, are laws that are recognized; these laws are not written any where but in the essence of all individuals. Robespierre was elected as the representative of the National Convention and joined a political club called the radical Jacobin party. Being apart of the Convention and the Jacobins, Robespierre took over the administrative power of the Republic. Because the Jacobins believed that France was in need of change and restructuring, and Robespierre was now the head of the Convention, he can develop such change. By doing so he argues that in the land, the use of ethics must be replaced with the use of pride, proposition for traditions, self-regard for arrogance, magnificence for narcissism, prestige for money, and immorality of the sovereign for virtues and the phenomenon. He believed in democracy and the Republic of virtue. He felt that in order to set the basis of democracy within the people, the merge of both ending the war of independence and oppression must take place in order to put an end to the revolt. The essences of the Republic are virtue and equality. He explains how it is the development of virtue and the maintenance of equality that creates the Republic. Therefore, it is embraced or founded by an individual. He believed that the quality of being an admired government would be an advantage in gaining the trust of the citizens in order to create a strict and rigorous government, “…be trustful towards the people and severe towards itself.” (Bienvenu, p. 2, para. 2) Robespierre states the strengths and weaknesses of this theory: the strength being the triumph of truth rather than dishonesty, and the rights of the community’s interests than the private. The purpose…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays