Preview

Was the pattern of Alliances in Europe from 1879-1907 shaped primarily around Germany's concerns for it's security?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the pattern of Alliances in Europe from 1879-1907 shaped primarily around Germany's concerns for it's security?
“The pattern of alliances and agreements formed in Europe in the years 1879-1907 was shaped primarily by Germany’s concerns about its security’

Germany became a formidable power in Europe after its unification in 1871. This power shift meant that Germany was a key player in the international politics of the time. With multiple crises occurring in the region, and tensions between countries growing, needs for alliances and agreements grew. The Dual Alliance, Three Emperors Alliance, Triple Alliance, Mediterranean Agreement, Reinsurance Treaty, Franco-Russian Alliance, Entente Cordiale and Anglo-Russian Entente were the major diplomatic policies formed during 1879-1900. By focusing on the threats Germany faced and how the alliances related to them it is obvious that the pattern of alliances in Europe were primarily shaped around Germany’s concerns for its security.

Germany was a new country, having being unified under the guidance of Otto von Bismarck in 1871, after the defeat of Austria in 1866, and France in 1871. The years following the confederation of the previous 39 Germanic states were times of change. Not only had a new, stronger country been created, threatening other empires, but the balance of power also shifted. Germany’s army of conscripted soldiers, its strong economy and large, nationalistic population, meant the country was, overall, very powerful. However, it was faced with threats, including its geographic position in central Europe, which needed new tactics to forestall.

Prior to his dismissal in 1890, The German Chancellor, Bismarck, was responsible for the formation of the majority of alliances. Bismarck was intent on keeping Germany as a unified country, which could only be achieved by assuring its safety from military defeat. The Iron Chancellor feared internal conflict due to multiple nationalities, and the Catholic Church due to its devotion to the Pope rather than the state. But what Bismarck feared most was the possibility of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II’s foreign policy undid Bismarck’s policies, where he worked towards avoiding a war on two fronts for Germany. Apart from Austria-Hungary Alliance (1879), Three Emperor's Alliance (1881), treaties with Serbia in 1881 and Romania in 1883, Triple Alliance (1882) and eventually the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia (1887), which he considered essential to keep the Russians from reaching an alliance with the French and threaten Germany on two sides. The Schlieffen Plan, conceived by Count Alfred von Schlieffen in 1905 and further refined in the years was to cater for this eventuality. This occurred when the Russian Treaty was scheduled to expire in June 1890 and the Russians under The Tzar, Alexander III were aware of the fact that Bismarck was about to be replaced. Therefore, to secure relations with Germany they suggested renewing the Reinsurance Treaty for 6 years instead of 3 years. The new German Chancellor Caprivi and Wilhelm II decided not to renew it, this gave Russia a feeling of being isolated and vulnerable as her relations with Britain were not good at that time and it was just a natural development that France and Russia form an alliance. The French diplomats immediately began to work on this with the Tzar and an alliance was negotiated in 1894. This action was the one where…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A treaty was designed to keep peace in Europe, instead it pushed the continent towards war. Many alliances were kept in secret. By 1907 two major alliances were formed: the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente The alliance that was developed were two different sides which included Austria, Germany and Italy (the Triple Alliance), and France, Russia and Britain (the Triple Entente). The alliances were formed were all defensive and would operate only when a country was attacked. The alliances and or agreements were seen as two opposing sides which were the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente which had left Germany to be surrounded by some potential enemies.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 M.A.I.N Causes

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    National security was a critical issue for all the major states, the developing tensions meant that no single nation felt secure by itself and every one of them needed allies on whom they could depend . In 1879 , Germany ,Austria-Hungary formed an alliance . They were joined by Italy because of it`s historic antipathy towards France . In response , Russia and France signed the `Double Entente ` in 1894 .…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany, until the late 19th century, was little more than a loose union of fragmented states. Dominating these states was Austria, the Habsburg’s largest stronghold. Unfortunately for Austria, its involvement in the Crimean War forced it out of the major spotlight in European power politics, making it a minor presence in the continent. This left a power vacuum in Germany which was quickly filled by Prussia, a military state with a history of strong rulers.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time period where Germany was looking to expand it’s reign outside of their borders, much of Europe was already under control of other powers and they were forced to focus their expansion on African territories. The problem with this plan of action was that the British navy was considered the strongest naval force in the world, and they already possessed control of many waterways leading to territories desired by both Great Britain and Germany. Due to this predicament, militarism in Germany began with great naval expansion “following the appointment of Admiral von Tirpitz as Secretary of State for the Navy in 1897” (Fulbrook 142). His push for rapid naval growth for means of both a deterrent to other nations and a means of competing with British naval forces lead to the creation of the Naval League and a strong national support for naval expansion, something that did not go unnoticed by other nations. German navy building brought about “a general sense that war was looming, and all European states began a race to be ready for war when it came” (Fulbrook 149). The rapid expansion of Germany in almost all regards and actions taken by other nations presented the inevitability of war, but other key factors also played major roles in the culmination of…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    asdsa

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European leaders believed creating a balance of power would prevent one country from being more powerful than another European country. The idea was if Germany, England, France, and Russia were all equal in power, than there would be no war. But the Chancellor of Prussia, Otto von Bismarck, thought differently. He didn’t like that Germany was being squished by Russia and France, so to solve this problem he created an alliance with Austria- Hungary.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry Kissinger Email

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bismarck was an astute and revered leader in the European community. His departure signaled a change in Germany’s foreign policy. Germany’s pursuit for its own security became the reason for its insecurity. Germany became the strongest military power in continental Europe and caused Great Britain, France and Russia to align against it. Ironically, for the greater part of Imperial Germany’s history, Russia was considered the main threat to peace in Europe. Russia always wanted more land and craved for territorial expansion.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He decided against renewing a treaty with Russia, effectively opting for the Austrian alliance. Germany's western and eastern neighbours, France and Russia, signed an alliance in 1894 united by fear and resentment of Berlin. In 1898, Germany began to build up its navy, although this could only alarm the world's most powerful maritime nation, Britain. Recognising a major threat to her security, Britain abandoned the policy of holding aloof from entanglements with continental powers. Within ten years, Britain had concluded agreements, albeit limited, with her two major colonial rivals, France and Russia. Europe was divided into two armed camps: the Entente Powers and the Central Powers, and their populations began to see war not merely as inevitable but even…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the armies and navies of Europe grew in might and strength, the need for alliances grew stronger. People also feared the German Empire as being the next possible aggressor. The need for alliances was renewed in order to contain aggression. The French and Russians wanted to contain the Germans, while the Germans and Austrians wanted to contain the Russians.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coursework

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Initially, interpretation A presents the view that mutual pacts between Germany, Belgium and France helped peace in the region. These agreements would have allowed the possibility of future dealings as well as reducing post-war tensions; however, as interpretation D agrees, I believe this détente was an “illusion”. I believe the idea the agreements helped achieve stability to be unjustified, as the 1920’s show, arbitration through international organisations failed to work – especially where Eastern Europe was concerned. In 1920 Poland launched two aggressive wars against Lithuania and Russia, the 1920 Polish-Soviet war and the 1919 Polish-Lithuanian war respectively, and despite Lithuania’s appeals towards the League of Nations, no action was taken against Poland. Russia’s situation also highlights a problem with countries that were not invited to join the League, namely Russia and Germany, as they could not appeal to the League - this is supported by France’s military invasion of the Ruhr in 1923. This supports the idea that arbitration did not achieve stability in 1920; countries could make agreements without fear of retribution from the League if they broke them, and this would have furthered paranoia amongst newer and smaller states in Eastern Europe who were unable to properly defend themselves. Fear from attacks would have led to a build up in arms, armaments, and alliances as is shown with the formation of the ‘Little Entente’ between Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia in 1919 and 1920. While one could argue this would have led to stability through stability, the Genoa Conference of 1922 highlighted tensions between the countries, especially where the Soviet Union was concerned – because of its failures, I believe it served only to increase tensions in the East with the Soviet Union and Germany. This…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The key point when describing German Foreign Policy before 1914 is of their willingness to risk war for their own gains in order to achieve world domination and the status of a major power. Michael Gordon argues that this war Germany risked did not, in their minds, involve Britain - their greatest rival;…

    • 2820 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays