Was Us Justified in Using the Atomic Bomb in Japan?

Over the history of the United States, people have been debating over the issue of US using the atomic bomb on Japan. Some may feel that United States was justified and others might feel that US was not justified. The usage of atomic bomb in Japan might seem wrong today, but it was the best option during the war. The United States was justified in using the atomic bombs against Japan in World War II. Some may feel that the United States was justified in using atomic bombs against Japan. The US was obligated to use the atomic bomb, because, after the Potsdam Conference in July, US asked the Japanese to surrender in early August. Japanese said “no” and that they would never surrender. This left Truman with two very difficult decisions; one: keep fighting or two: use the atomic bomb to end the war. Truman chose the usage of atomic bomb on Japan to end the war quickly, by doing this, he saved tenth of thousands of American soldiers lives. According the Truman’s Decision to Drop the Bomb; four cities were recommended as targets: Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, because of fewer populations. The atomic barely got the Japanese to surrender. Us dropped two, then only with the intervention of the Emperor and even then, there was an attempted coup to prevent surrender. If US have hadn’t used the bomb, the war could have lasted for decades. Others may feel that the United States was not justified in using atomic bombs against Japan. The drop of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed hundreds of thousands of people. It was unnecessary for United States to use 2 bombs on Japan, because Japan was already largely defeated. According The Ordeal of Hiroshima; it states that: people were having a normal, joyful and beautiful day then suddenly all gone in flash of light. The doctor describes how the city was in peace in one minute and how it was incinerating in the other. People were in agony as well as him. US killed innocents of people, they have committed a war crime and they have to be trialed for this. Not only people were killed my explosion, they were also killed by radiations. The US had no idea what the bomb could do before they dropped it. The bombs have been affecting the new born babies up to today. It was not right and it was not necessary. The United States was justified in using atomic weapons against Japan. It was either drop the bombs, kill a few thousand people or not drop the bomb, the war lingers on and more people die than the bombs killed. WW2 had to stop and this made it happen. Neither country could afford any more warring on the other, this was a costly expense. True the US killed innocent people, but if they didn't, more would have died at the hands of the Japanese and of the Americans. The bombs not only made sense, they saved lives. The war had to end because the Japanese soldiers were fighting inhumanely; they were fighting with the system of kamikaze. Over the history of the United States, people have been debating over the issue of US using the atomic bomb on Japan. Some may feel that United States was justified and others might feel that US was not justified. Supporters might say that US had dropped atomic bomb to end the war quickly and to save lives. Opponents might say that the usage of bomb killed millions of innocent civilians, it was unnecessary to even use the bomb, because Japan was weakened already. The United States was justified in using atomic bomb, because Japan was given a choice to surrender and they refused.