Preview

Why Did Japan Dropped The Atomic Bomb On Japan?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
833 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Japan Dropped The Atomic Bomb On Japan?
During World War II Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and ruined many of our fleets and military. The decision on what to do to deal with Japan was a tough one. America made the right decision on dropping the atomic bomb on Japan.

The atomic bomb was necessary in order to assure the war would end as soon as possible. On August 6th the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, on august 9th a second one was dropped on Nagasaki, and on August 10th Japan declared its intention to surrender. This is clear proof that atomic bomb was an effective way to end the war. Even if it did kill many people it might actually have killed less people then if we had kept the war going for much longer.

Japan brought it on themselves. Japan surprised us with an attack on Pearl Harbor. This was one of the worst things that could've been done. We were not expecting this to happen at all because Pearl Harbor is too shallow to drop bombs into it so we had kept almost all of our fleet there. Japan invented something to go over part of the bombs so that it would make it okay to do this. Japan hit us hard very hard and we had to choice but to strike back with war. They hit us harder then we could've expected in Pearl Harbor and they
…show more content…

Both of the countries needed desperately to have the other one surrender. The war had been going on for a long time and it wasn't going anywhere something drastic had to be done. It was better that it be done to Japan because they had already hit us hard. If we had waited for them to drastically injure us then that would've cause for us to surrender and for them to win the war. Then a lot of people would've died from that plus even more while we would've been waiting for them to attack. Sometimes unfortunate things happen from war. They may be sad but they will happen and it's not the wrong decision made by us the war was avoided in the first place so bad things were going to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article, Ending The War Against Japan: Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb, the author provides information on the war in the Pacific which involved the United States and Japan. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the United States entered the second World War in 1941. United States gained control of Okinawa in 1945 which meant that the U.S had control, in the months of May through August there were major air attacks on Japan, the Manhattan Project and the two atomic bombs the United States dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the choice out of the many options that might have been given to President Truman and Secretary of War, Henry Stimson. They felt that dropping the atomic bomb was the best way to get the Japanese to give an unconditional surrender.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan was extremely focused on the emperor and felt like surrendering would be the last option for them since they did not want to appear weak. Japan was willing to give up all their women, men, and children if need be to fight back. The outcome of the war included two bombings in Japan for a sign of surrender.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To this day, many debate the primary reasoning behind Truman's decision to use Atomic Bombs against Japan and whether they served to bring a quick end to the war or to gain leverage with the Soviet Union in the post-war world. The cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was specifically decided as these were population dense cities that were primarily devoted to military production. These cities also did not hold cultural significance within Japan, as opposed to cities like Kyoto. Because of this, many argue that Truman did not seek to destroy Japanese culture or its people; the goal was to destroy Japanese means of war production. The war was coming to its end and it was only a matter of time before the Japanese surrendered.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the war continued, an invasion would be needed and such an invasion “… would have cost an estimated million casualties,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). It was even believed by President Truman “… that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). Even though the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, the quick end to the war they brought saved more lives in the long run than those that were lost in the…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1940’s it was a crazy and brutal century. Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Japanese. The attack took at least a couple of hours long. The Japanese damaged at least 20 ships, destroyed over 150 planes, and killed over 2,000 people. Since Pearl Harbor had happen the United States had declared war on Japan. The government did not…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When President Harry Truman made the decision to drop the first ever atomic bomb, did he saves lives or did he create a whole new Pandora's box that we would continue to struggle with today? After gathering facts and meeting with our Allies such as the Soviet Union, he believed that dropping the atomic bomb would make the Japanese surrender quickly saving lives in the long run. There were many factors that went into the decision that President Truman made. After the bloody battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, American soldiers and the American government realized that the Japanese would fight to the end. They did not believe they were "beaten" but they believed they were luring the American troops to their turf where they could fight a better battle in their rugged terrain.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor? Many hypotheses and theories exist for why that fateful day occurred in history. Was Japan trying to take over the world and the United States stood in their way? Did we deserve this? I believe Japan attacked Pearl Harbor for a combination of reasons. War is never simple and I have to believe that it is never just the fault of one. I believe that the combination of a breakdown of relations with the US, Japan’s imperialistic actions, and the US’s restriction on trade with Japan lit the fuse that resulted in the bombing of Pearl Harbor.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though many innocent lives were lost, the atomic bomb was justifiable to use in this case. More lives could have been lost if the U.S. would have invaded Japan. More specifically, the bomb saved Japanese lives. From the battle of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, we saw how extreme they were. If we were to take the mainland, we could have wiped out the entire nation, which is surplus compared to the lives lost from the bomb.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic that was dropped on Japan helped end the war earlier. The atomic bomb was the best way to assure an end to the war. “When the atomic bomb became available in July 1945, it appeared to be the most promising way to end the war”(Walker). By dropping the bomb on Japan, they would have to surrender because of their loss and destruction. The atomic bombs made Japan’s emperor make a decision as whether to surrender or continue. “The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki persuaded Emperor Hirohito, who had wavered for weeks, that the war must end immediately” (Walker). By dropping the bomb, the U.S. ended the war…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the soldiers were ready to die at any moment as long as they take out as many Americans as possible. The fighting style of the Japanese was deadly for American soldiers and the way fight on the battle proved to America that the Japanese would not give up on their country. Japanese men the were going into war knew that they were most likely not returning to their families at home, so they risked it all for their country. The fact that the Japanese would not surrender means that the United States would have to fight as long as the Japanese were willing to fight and that would have caused more American deaths than needed. The atomic bomb was the best solution to get the Japanese to surrender without having caused so many American deaths and the bomb did its job and pushed Japan to surrender.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was justifiable to drop the atomic bomb because it was the final turning point in winning WWII for the United States. As the history.com notes, “Six months of strategic fire-bombing of 37 Japanese…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the final stages of the war Germany had surrendered and the U.S. was on their way to victory; however, Japan, a major enemy at the time, would not settle for surrendering and continued to fight back. From the beginning it was clear that Japan would do anything in their power to win the war, so they would be seen as superior. This was learned first handedly by the U.S. after Japanese air crafts invaded Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, sinking eighteen ships, killing 2,403 Americans, and wounding 1,178 Americans. This attack on the U.S. was a significant…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the summer of 1945 the United States was entering the final stages of World War II. One could assume that ending the war quickly was a priority. President Truman was demanding “unconditional surrender” from Japan. In a statement he released on May 8th, he described unconditional surrender as “Our blows will not cease until the Japanese military and naval forces lay down their arms in unconditional surrender. Just what does the unconditional surrender of the armed forces mean for the Japanese people? It means the end of the war. It means the termination of the influence of the military leaders who have brought Japan to the present brink of disaster.… Unconditional surrender does not mean the extermination or enslavement of the Japanese people. (Alperovitz, Gar (2010-12-29). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (p. 39).)” So if the war were to end the Japanese would have to unconditionally surrender, secretary of state James Byrnes said as much, “For instance, in his 1947 book Speaking Frankly, James F. Byrnes declared without qualification: “Had the Japanese Government listened to [Ambassador to Soviet Union] Sato and surrendered unconditionally, it would not have been necessary to drop the atomic bomb. (Alperovitz, p. 34)” The Japanese refused to surrender because of the terms they would be conceding to. They wanted a guarantee that their emperor would be protected and they felt unconditional surrender would put him in jeopardy. “The reality is that as the summer of 1945 progressed, most U.S. leaders fully realized that the only serious condition Japan’s leaders sought was an assurance that the Emperor would not be eliminated. (Alperovitz, p.34)” One could conclude that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan’s refusal to unconditionally surrender. There is also belief that the atomic bomb was dropped to intimidate the Soviet Union. As historian Barton Berstein put it, “The combat use…

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays