Porter uses dialogue first and foremost to show the vast difference between what what we want to say and what we really end up saying. A great example of this would be Granny’s dislike towards the doctor. Granny makes comments here and there such as, “Where were you forty years ago when I pulled through milk-leg and double pneumonia? You weren’t even born.” (7) but she can not manage to come up with the exact words to say to convey her anger properly. The structure of her insults simply sound snappy and almost like whining instead of angry or purposeful. Granny’s lack of ability to relay the true meaning of her emotions shows the reader that she is slowly losing her grip on reality. The way Porter uses dialogue also serves as a theme for the…
The characters in “Rip Van Winkle” are exaggerated and strange. For the most part, Irving uses Rip Van Winkle & Dame Van Winkle to show exaggeration in the characters. People in their town view Rip Van Winkle as someone who is friendly & loves to help everyone. His wife, Dame Van Winkle, only saw him as being lazy due to Rip not doing much work around his house. Dame Van Winkle spends most of her time in this story criticizing him and Rip just “….shrugged his shoulders, shook his head, cast up his eyes, but said nothing.” To get away from his wife’s nagging, Rip chooses to go up to the Catskill Mountains with his dog. Dame Van Winkle…
Olds use of tone allows a reader to acknowledge how the wealthy woman stereotypes the…
The lack of disclosure between the working and upper-middle class makes the upper-middle class oblivious to the working class’s hard work effort. In the first paragraph of the passage, Ehrenreich conveys a tone of annoyance and sarcasm. When the maids arrive at the home, they are unable to get inside. Ehrenreich voices that her itchy pink rash, “Must be poison ivy picked up at [the] lockout”(86). This sentence immediately helps the reader feel Ehrenreich's pain, and carries out the irritated tone of the paragraph. Ehrenreich also expresses a mocking tone and her annoyance towards the mistreated working class through her word choice and diction. She explains that the owner of the cleaning service, Ted, “[blames the workers] for customers’ fecklessness”(86). She includes the word fecklessness to create a snobby image for the homeowners, acknowledging that they are oblivious to the maids agonizing work. Ehrenreich also compares the maid service to elementary school students. She illustrates how a day off from work for the maids was not “like a snow day for the grade schools crowd”, because Ted always finds a way to make the maids at fault. Ehrenreich also compares the maids to be, “like cat burglars” while they search for a point of entrance into the house (87). With the use of these similes, Ehrenreich shows her irritated and sarcastic tone. This paragraph reveals Ehrenreich's feeling of dissatisfaction with the gap between homeowner and worker, and how the working class is mistreated.…
The narrator defends the waiter, saying “He did not wish to be unjust. He was only in a hurry” (154). The narrator wants the audience to be aware that the waiter is ignorant and cruel but he is not evil. He is like any other young adult that hates his or her job and wants to go home. The naivety that comes along with the waiter’s age causes him to be unaware and inconsiderate of the old man’s feelings. He socially categorizes the man based off of the three most distinct characteristics he has observed. While the waiter constantly belittles the man for his age, disability, and loneliness, the narrator wants the audience to be aware that the young waiter is a normal person and is not capable of evil…
Steinbeck shows moments of her being overly cruel. She gets lonely and looks around for people to talk to but when she realises that the guys don’t want to talk to her she turns on crooks telling him that she can get him hanged because she would accuse him of rape.…
Readers attempt to find the meaning behind the words, but instead end up oversimplifying what he intends to say by choosing choice words and sentences to focus on. Critics and readers then focus on these small ideas that Thoreau did not even intend for his audience to pay close attention to, which in turn causes large audiences to blow off his real meaning because of what they have chosen to focus their attention on. Solnit points out one of these focus points in her essay, “Mysteries of Thoreau, Unsolved”. “There is one writer in all literature whose laundry arrangements have been excoriated again and again…” (18). She then continues to correct the misinterpretations that surround that idea by turning Thoreau into a real human being, rather than the hypocritical writer that many have made him out to be. She points out that although some may not live by their word, it doesn’t make their words any less true. For example, she speaks of Martin Luther King Jr., “Martin Luther King Jr. was right about racism and injustice whether or not he led a blameless life” (Solnit 20). Thoreau is often focused on as who he was as a symbol rather than who he was as a person. Solnit attempts to make her readers see him as a person, therefore making him more relatable, as well as making his writings more understandable. She refutes…
Precis of Gilman, Charlotte, Perkins “Mrs. Beazley’s Deeds.” In Barbara Solomon’s The Haves And Have-Nots (386-400). New York: New York / New American Library.…
Papule – elevated; palpable; firm; circumscribed; 1cm in diameter (e.g. Psoriasis; seborrheic and actinic keratoses)…
On his college campus he find himself demonized by certain female peers because of his sex. Women accuse him of being part of group collectively “guilty of keeping all the joys and privileges to [themselves]” He finds himself condemned to share the guilt of the few, the few who actually took advantage. The jarring contrast, between the individual and the standard they are held to, recurs throughout the text. The saddening theme of the tragedy of assigned identity, the struggle with inescapable assigned guilt, rears its head throughout both texts. To amplify this feeling of injustice, both authors use vivid imagery to juxtapose the reality of their subjects against the supposed evil they both have cherished. Kingston’s Aunt vilified and despised by villagers for her supposed immorality is described as a gentle happy woman, the apple of her father's eye, a loving woman, a mother who didn’t abandon her child. The men Sanders knew, who stole all the pleasures in the world, live with the privilege of hernias, finicky backs , missing fingers, bent backs, “hands tattooed with scars”. The poignancy of these characters comes from their reality as the antithesis of what society has labeled them as. It strikes the reader, makes them understand what the writers have being trying convey, an understanding of the vast inequity of these…
Inequality because of racism can create unfair situations in which people feel they have no self worth. Steinbeck explores this notion in the novel through the character of Crooks. The way Crooks is treated by other characters in this novel portrayed how white people in that society treated coloured people. Crooks empowers himself by educating himself and being able to read. “S’pose you couldn’t go into the bunk house and play rummy ‘cause you was black. How’d you like that? S’pose you had to sit out here an’ read books. Sure you could play horseshoes till it got dark, but then you got to read books. Books ain’t no good. A guy needs somebody—to be near him.” This is significant because it explains to the reader that Crooks has in fact taught himself to read and owns books. It tells us that sooner or later Crooks is going to go crazy because he has nobody to talk to or to be near. The quote indicates repetition, which helps us understand the pain Crooks feels when he is treated the way he is.…
Smith, in many ways attracts our attention. Although he is a mild, harmless looking little guy, he performs a very difficult job (hanging) without shame. ¡°Somebody¡¯s got to do my job. There¡®s got to be a hangman¡± ¡° the job hasn¡¯t been so disagreeable¡±. From the quotation we see that Smith loves his job no matter how other people say about it. Michael, however, he doesn¡¯t appreciate his own job very much even it¡¯s a nice one. ¡°But it¡¯s nothing like a first-class city paper and I don¡¯t expect to be working on it long. I want to get a reporter¡¯s job on a city paper.¡± Michael, on the other hand is kind of discrimination against Smith¡¯s job. ¡°If you took another job, you and your wife could probably go fishing together.¡± ¡°I just meant that if it was such disagreeable work, Smitty.¡± As we see here, Michael¡¯s attitude toward to Smitty¡¯s job could relate to our real life. In our society, there are many difficult jobs. People don¡¯t like them because they are dirty or dangerous, but if we don¡¯t go to do, then who will do them for us? As a victim, Smith in the end is almost killed by the angry crowd. ¡°One small stone hit him on the head. Blood trickled from the side of his head as he looked around helplessly at all the angry people.¡± I wonder that is Smith responsible for the unfair judgment of hangingThomas Delaney? Why the town people get so angry with him? I think Smith didn¡¯t do anything wrong, and hanging Thomas is just the duty of his job. It is also an irony of the story, as we see what…
Alexander Isayevich Solzhenitsyn once said “Literature transmits incontrovertible condensed experience… from generation to generation. In this way literature becomes the living memory of a nation.” Literature was not created “in a vacuum.” Literature was created in an open environment, it expands and reaches places that not everyone believes it will. Literature is made to express thoughts or to reach social issues. Alexander Isayevich Solzhenitsyn’s quote could be interpreted in a couple of ways. Literature in fact, does transmit almost unchanging, although it is changing, experiences from generation to generation. Whatever it is that is being transmitted into the “new generation” is what soon…
“In that same village, and in one of these very houses, there lived, many years since, while the country was yet a province of Great Britain, a simple, good-natured fellow, of the name of Rip Van Winkle. He was a descendant of the Van Winkles who figured so gallantly in the chivalrous days of Peter Stuyvesant, and accompanied him to the siege of Fort Christina. He inherited, however, but little of the martial character of his ancestors. I have observed that he was a simple, good-natured man; he was, moreover, a kind neighbor and an obedient, henpecked husband”…
For a time you might wander unhindered, elated by thoughts of liberty, but very soon you would find that you cannot dwell forever on the heights. Let us suppose that you feel tired and that you enter a tea-shop in default of a better place of rest. The shop looks sordid and dingy, and you shudder slightly as a vision of true repose comes to mind – something with green fields and running water and the scent of grass and flowers in it. But, alas! you are not free to that extent; here there are no Elysian fields – here is London with all its dreary grey buildings and endless discomfort. So you enter the shop. A pale, grim young woman comes up as you choose a seat, and asks what she will bring. You desire only rest, but once more you are reminded that you are not free to choose; rest of a kind you may have, but at the same time tea and buns will be forced upon you. You settle yourself in your uncomfortable corner, sip some of the nasty tea, taste a bun, and ruminate dubiously about your determination to be free. The grim young woman presently brings the bill for tea and cakes, and you realise in a flash that here again in the person of the shop-girl is a limitation of freedom – you are not free from her. To the extent that your needs have been satisfied by her service, to this extent your life is dependent upon that service. At this point where you and she have met in life, the one as receiver and the other as the giver of service, each is to a certain degree dependent upon the other.…