Wayne Davis Definition Of Happiness

The question of seeking ‘happiness’ is what every individual looks for in his or her life. This essay will weigh arguments whether the thesis for the identification of happiness is aligned with pleasure. I will be using Daniel Hybron and Wayne Davis’s ideas to support my arguments to answer the question presented. When trying to analyze and answer the question one must understand what the terms and definitions of pleasure and happiness really means. The first ideology to examine will be Wayne Davis’s. Davis’s claim is that happiness and pleasure comes from the same place. The way Davis distinct his claim is from the terms “dispositional” and “Occurent”. The term “dispositional” explains that happiness is a long-term act that it doesn’t go away and it isn’t temporary. On the other hand, his term “Occurent” explains that happiness is divided into parts. Like we say “carpe diem”, live in the moment. Therefore, Davis thinks that it is a momentary act of happiness. Davis thinks that getting pleasure equals to being happy. This theory that Davis has can be categorized in two two concepts “non epistemic” and “epistemic”. These two terms contain the definitions of where pleasure comes from. In the term ‘non-epistemic’ he argues that it happens in chains of events, which doesn’t bring happiness. However, the term ‘Epistemic’ is the
Hybron states that happiness can be categorized into two terms: prudential and psychological. The term prudential states that life is an act of “flourishing” as the words “Eudemonia” explains in Aristotelian Ethics. On the other hand, the term Physiological covers ‘Hedonism’ which comes from within your feelings. Hybron’s view on the question explains that happiness isn’t something that is temporary and which happens and ends in an instant. Hybron doesn’t connect happiness with pleasure. The role of emotions and feelings and hedonism is more crucial for