Preview

We Know With Confidence Only When We No Little, With Knowledge Lens Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
We Know With Confidence Only When We No Little, With Knowledge Lens Analysis
“We know with confidence only when we no little; with knowledge, doubt increases”. The quote used in the prescribed title was adapted from famous German writer, statesman and scientist, JW von Goethe. During his lifetime, from 1749 to 1832, knowledge that was supported by sufficient evidence was limited as was a majority of widely accepted scientific knowledge. Goethe’s quote seems unfitting for the era in which he lived with little readily available evidence to back his claim. Despite this fact, the previous quotation shows incredible knowledgeability with foresight and time has proven Goethe to be correct, something that will be proven through this essay. The quote can be supported by evidence from multiple areas of knowledge. However, the …show more content…
They had been unable to find a perfect square root for the number 2 using only whole numbers. Pythagoras was absolutely sure that there was a whole number that when multiplied by itself would equal two. This was before the time that decimals had been widely accepted and almost all mathematicians worked with fractions. One day a man named Hippasus came along and proved that there was no whole number or fraction that when squared would equal 2 using Pythagoras’s own theorem. Legend states that Pythagoras’s group threw Hippasus into a body of water and drowned him for factually disproving his dream. In modern times, the nonexistence of a perfect square root of 2 and that the answer is an irrational number is known to be an absolute fact. The aforementioned scenario relates to the title in that Pythagoras was absolutely sure with confidence that he …show more content…
This is also true in the modern era with the theory of global warming or climate change. It is a disputed theory that is generally accepted to be fact. But can science ever really be accepted as fact? This knowledge question can be answered differently depending on one’s interpretation of science. The classic interpretation would be no. Most things that are accepted as facts in science are theories, literally meaning they cannot be proven to be true, and at any time someone could discover something to disprove it. We have what we call natural laws, but those may only be true in our universe. The counter interpretation would be yes, things in science can be accepted as fact if there is nothing to disprove them. However, which one is better for the human race. I am inclined to pick the former because it implies that there are other possibilities to discover and that more research can be done. When in collusion with Goethe’s quote, the first interpretation suggests that the more we know, the more we will be able to discover and the more our world will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay, John M. Barry uses antithesis to display a contrast in his thoughts and the assuming thoughts of the readers. In doing this, the author is not only able to show the readers the different sides of how scientists are perceived by people, but as well as how they actually are in the world of scientific research. The author collates certainty and uncertainty as an example for the readers to view that scientists of the world are just like them. Scientists contain “certainty, [which] creates strength, and uncertainty, [which] creates weakness” (Barry). In using these disparities, Barry is showing the readers that “science teaches us to doubt” (Barry). By elaborating on the concepts of certainty and uncertainty, readers are able to see…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge, the key to progress, has proven to be a human being’s most powerful and significant weapon. We gain knowledge when we put our brain to work at the problems we need to solve in life. It doesn’t matter what we are trying to accomplish, whether it be creating a new technology or learning how to put together a puzzle, the matter of fact is that both request great examination and research to resolve and learn. Scientific research is a technique used to investigate phenomena, correct previous understanding, and acquire new knowledge. Knowledge could lead us to a possible cure for cancer, an alternative for fossil fuels, and the creation of a revolutionary technology. Nevertheless, all these benefits are a reason why John M. Barry writes about scientific research with admiration, curiosity, and passion in which he blends a use of rhetorical strategies in order to give off an overall perspective of the necessity and mystery within scientific research.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethos Pathos And Logos

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Formatting Requirements: Please compose your draft using a word processor using 12-pitch Times New Roman font, double-spaced with 1” margins. The essay should be from 5-7 pages long. I will only accept a printed copy of your essay.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In What Ways May Disagreement Aid the Pursuit of Knowledge in the Natural and Human Sciences?…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science Barry

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though science is often considered a field for those who want concrete answers and find speculation something beneath them, John M. Barry reveals quite the opposite. Through this passage, Barry shows his reader through numerous rhetorical strategies that scientific research is actually a field for the daring and courageous willing to be left unsure of most answers and rely on faith that someday their work will yield something of importance on the subject.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rhetorical essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By juxtaposing the antithetical concepts of “certainty” and “uncertainty,” and by emphasizing the exceptional burdens of the latter, Barry compels his readers to acknowledge the courage that is required of any successful scientists and, indeed, to appreciate the unnatural skills that a scientist must possess in order to “overcome significant obstacles.” He effectively argues that uncertainty, though a weakness, is a cross that all scientists must bear and that, in order to become a successful scientist at all, one must first recognize that weakness and then persevere in spite of it. To the casual observer, venturing into the unknown might seem the more courageous feat of the scientists, but, as the allusion to Bernard’s quote reveals, the most courageous feat, and what science endeavors to teach most of all, is “to doubt” – that is, to be uncertain and to work with the discomfort of that uncertainty.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science is a fact. We see and use it everyday. We tend to not give our mothers enough credit, but when they cook you your dinner that you digest the food gets broken down by acids and then either stored or made into energy. Even when your pen touches a piece of paper and leaves it residue you are partaking in science. We tend to not consider our daily routines as such a frequently talked about phenomenon, but its true.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this situation, knowledge was more powerful than intended. The importance in taking care in its use is apparent to achieve positive results instead of negative consequences. Demonstrated in Shelley’s novel, some scientific advancement, if not handled carefully, can have a turn of negative…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Certainty and Doubt Essay

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    William Lyon Phelps and Bertrant Russel have conflicting views regarding the importance of certainty and doubt. Phelps position is that having certainty in oneself allows you to accomplish impossible tasks. While Russel believes it is healthy to have a certain amount of doubt in oneself and that people should not only believe in any one philosophy. Both Russel and Phelps make good points on the relationship between doubt and certainty but a combination of the two would be the most helpful. You should always have certainty when it comes to your own capabilities, but doubt is useful when forming your own beliefs and when it comes to others beliefs.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge In Frankenstein

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Effects of acquirement of knowledge being dangerous Throughout history, knowledge has been shown as a fantastic thing, but the novel Frankenstein shows that knowledge is not always a virtuous moral. Across the story every main character shows what knowledge has done to them through their actions and their words. With this in mind, there are also magnificent things knowledge has created in history, which will be shown and supported with excerpts from academic articles. First, evidence of what knowledge has done for us. From Steaming The Debate Advances in Stem Research by Diane Katz and Bruce Walker, “They were able to grow brain and heart tissue from lab-created stem cells.”…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hospers' Argument

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hospers challenges the view of a radical sceptic of that there is no knowledge for everything is doubtful by providing vital grounds on how it can ultimately be attained and by adopting the two different senses of knowing, the strong and weak sense. He then fortifies his argument by proving the incoherence of a doubter. This essay will look on his arguments against radical scepticism and finally to what extent it is successful.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many people who respect the idea that you can ‘Do anything you put your mind to.’ This phrase in itself suggests that mankind as a whole is capable of reaching any target set before it, simply if we try hard enough. From this we can take it to mean that any form of knowledge is attainable by man should we just put in the hours and attempt to discover it. This essay is asking us to consider whether there are types of knowledge that cannot be reached, that is simply out of our grasp. I believe this to be false and I believe science is in fact the answer and that if utilized effectively we can use it to reach any knowledge we so desire.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays