COM/150 Effective Essay Writing
Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay
November 7th, 2010
Kathryn Geranios
Gay Rights Expository Essay
Even though some people believe that being homosexual is a choice made by an individual either as a way to rebel or as a perversion, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community (LGBT) deserve the same rights that heterosexuals are entitled to. Rights such as the right to be married in more than just a few states and the right to openly serve in the military without the fear of being discharged. Lately there have been several news stories that involve the LGBT in some way, the biggest being the teens that committed suicide because of bullying in school or over the Internet. It is stories like these that make a person wonder if there will ever be a day that the LGBT are accepted or at least be left alone to live their own lives as they are. So many people are being discharged from the military because the word got out that they are homosexual, including officers that have been in the military for years. This should not be allowed to go on. These men have literally been risking their lives for years for no reason but pride in their country and they are discharged because they are seen unfit to serve the country. Gay rights is a big topic in the United States right now and is the main focus of this expository essay.
The LGBT community deserves the same rights that everyone else is entitled to. According to research, in 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed a law on any gay man or gay woman that, if broken, would mean the men would be castrated and the women 's nose cartilage would be mutilated (Head, 2010). The U.S. Supreme Court finally put a stop to laws like these after enforcing them for 224 years (Head, 2010). In 1951 the first national gay rights organization was founded, but because of the times it was too dangerous and not to mention illegal so they had to meet in code (Head, 2010). In 1969 the gay rights movement really accelerated, after raiding a gay bar in Greenwich Village and arresting employees and drag performers the NYPD got more than they bargained for, a crowd of more than 2,000 gay, lesbian, and transgender supporters of the bar took on the police and forced them into the bar which caused a three-day long riot. Since then there have been several presidents and businesses that have "come out" as supporters of gay rights. There were states that started to let gays get married and some that started to then took it away such as California recently.
One would think that of all the rights that should automatically be given to the LGBT, the right to openly serve in the military would be at the top. However, that isn 't the case. Many men and women have been discharged from the military for simply being proud of who they are. Some of whom served in the military for years, risking their lives to keep America safe. America 's history has had several different policies when it comes to homosexuals in the military. Before World War II there were no written policies against homosexuals serving in the military, except that sodomy was thought as a crime by military law ever since the Revolutionary War times (Powers,2010). However, during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, homosexuality was defined as a mental defect and all homosexuals were barred from serving based on medical problems (Powers, 2010). In 1982 the Department of Defense actually came out saying that "homosexuality was incompatible with military service," in a DOD directive causing nearly 17,000 men and women to be discharged during the 1980s (Powers, 2010). By the end of this decade, several homosexuals of the military publically came out and challenged their discharges through the legal system and by the beginning of 1993 it appeared that the military 's ban on homosexual personnel would soon be overturned (Powers,2010). After a long debate and congressional hearings President Clinton and Senator Sam Nunn reached a compromise which they called "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell, Don 't Pursue", under its terms those serving in the military will not be asked about their sexual orientation and would not be discharged simply for being homosexual. However, having sexual relations, or displaying any sort of attraction to the same sex, or telling any other military personnel about their sexual orientation is considered "homosexual conduct" under the policy and is a basis for involuntary discharge (Powers, 2010). As of right now "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell" remains in effect, and will continue to for awhile it seems. President Obama is taking a different stance on the issue and instead of facing the problem head-on is putting it aside for a later date (Powers,2010). I have faith that one day, maybe not in my generation or lifetime, but someday the LGBT community will be given the rights that they are entitled to as "free" Americans.
Although this essay is focused mainly on the fight for gay rights in the United States alone, people need to understand that the LGBT is fighting for their rights all over the world. In Spain, where the kings and queens were once the biggest defenders of the Christian religion, the socialist government has launched a reform that will grant gays and lesbians the right to legal get married and adopt (Graff, 2004). Even though Europe has a long tradition of protecting gay rights, Denmark was actually the first to introduce registered partnerships between homosexual couples in 1989 (Graff, 2004). The Dutch finally legalized same-sex marriage in 2001 (Graff, 2004). So why can 't the United States? Why are we so far behind in the times? The United States, however, is surprisingly not the worst country when it comes to legalizing gay rights. Spain is actually where the fight is fiercest, even though the government will allow homosexual couples to marry and adopt children, the Church has called on Spanish Catholics to help fight the legislation (Graff, 2004). Which isn 't anywhere near as bad as Italy, where the Italian parliament has passed one of the harshest assisted-fertility laws in Europe that bans donor sperm, donor eggs, and surrogate motherhood, all of which homosexual couples can take advantage of to have children, and limits assisted-fertility treatments to "stable" heterosexual couples (Graff, 2004). In the United States, same-sex couples couldn 't wed anywhere in the country until 2004. But now, same-sex marriage is legal in six states: Vermont, Iowa, Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire (Vestal,2009). Currently, the United States is divided on whether or not to redefine marriage. The California Supreme Court approved the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage but in turn allowed the 18,000 homosexual couples that had married before Proposition 8 took effect to continue to legally be married (Vestal, 2009). On top of this, twenty-nine other states have voter-approved prohibitions that block same-sex marriage in their state 's constitution to try and keep the judges from overturning the bans on same-sex marriage. In polls, a very large amount of Americans are still against equal marriage rights for the LGBT, but these margins are getting smaller (Vestal,2009). If gays continue to be denied these rights they miss out on benefits that heterosexual couples are automatically entitled to. The National Organization for Women (2003) stated, "Same-sex couples across the country are denied more than 1,000 federal protections and rights. Most states deny committed lesbian and gay couples hundreds of additional benefits. These rights range from the ability to file joint tax returns to the crucial responsibility of making decisions on a partner 's behalf in a medical emergency."
In conclusion, some people do think that being homosexual is a perversion or a way for their teen or family member to rebel against their parents. This is just not true, loving someone, whether of the same sex or not, is not something that can be controlled or stopped. Heterosexual couples love without reason, why can 't same-sex couples? People cannot help who they are attracted to, so why should they be punished for it? What can be done about this? Getting the word out that acceptance is as simple as keeping religion out of the topic altogether. Some people 's opinions are based on what they think is written the Bible and use passages from the Bible to back up their case. However, religion is supposed to be kept out of the courtroom so why is this topic an exception to that rule? If a person has a homosexual man or woman that has recently come out in their family, they should support them, help them through this difficult time don 't condemn them. In the long run it will do more damage to that person if they don 't have someone to support them or someone to trust through a change this big.
References:
Powers, R.(2010). An Overview of the Don 't Ask Don 't Tell Policy. Don 't Ask Don 't Tell-The Military Policy on Gays. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com/od/millegislation/a/dontask.htm
Graff, J.(2004). The Fight Over Gay Rights. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,733764,00.html
Head,T.(2010). The American Gay Rights Movement. Retrieved from: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gendersexuality/tp/History-Gay-Rights-Movement.htm
Vestal,C.(2009). Gay Marriage Legal in Six States. Retrieved from http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=347390
Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor 's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. Thank you for using WritePoint.
Curtis Little COM/150 Effective Essay Writing Week 9 [Write out numbers under 10] Day [If used as an adjective, these two words are hyphenated] 7 [Write out numbers under 10] Final Expository Essay November 7th, 2010 Kathryn Geranios Gay Rights Expository Essay Even though some people believe that being homosexual is a choice made by an individual either as a way to rebel or as a perversion, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community (LGBT) deserve the same rights that heterosexuals are entitled [The passive voice is a form of "be" (are) and a participle (entitled ). Over-use of the passive voice can make paragraphs officious and tedious to read. Try to use the active voice most often; for example, passive voice = The paper was completed on time. Active voice = the student completed the paper on time--See eCampus > Center for Writing Excellence > Tutorials & Guides > Grammar & Writing Guides > Active & passive voice] to. [Avoid using "at" or "to" at the end of sentence; this is informal grammar] Rights such as the right to be married [Passive voice] in more than just a few states and the right to openly serve [Doctoral rule (but good advice for any academic writer)--avoid a split infinitive; consider placing the adverb (openly) before or after the infinitive (to serve )--try "openly to serve " or "to serve openly" (or place "openly" later in the sentence)] in the military without the fear of being discharged. [Passive voice] Lately there have been several news stories that involve the LGBT in some way, the biggest being the teens that committed suicide because of bullying in school or over the Internet. It is stories like these that make a person wonder if there will ever be a day that the LGBT are accepted or at least be left alone to live their [Check pronoun agreement--if "their" refers to "person" (or a singular subject), it should be singular, too (his or her)] own lives as they [Check pronoun agreement--if "they" refers to "person" (or a singular subject), it should be singular, too (he or she) and perhaps require adjusting the following verb] are. So many people are being discharged [Passive voice] from the military because the word got [Doctoral rule (although good advice for any academic writer)--instead of using "get," which can mean many things, more formal is to use forms of "receive," "obtain," "arrive at," "can," "could," "grow," "able to," etc.] out that they are homosexual, including officers that have been in the military for years. This should not be allowed to go on. These men have literally [Beware: this word if used to mean "figuratively" is incorrect. "Literal" means "actual, real." Avoid using this word to add emphasis] been [Doctoral-level comment (also recommended for any academic writer)--do not divide two-part verb beginning with has/have/had. Try to place "literally" before or after the two-part verb (have been)--"literally have been" or "have been literally" (or place "literally" later in the sentence)] risking their lives for years for no reason but pride in their country and they are [Run-on sentence: place comma before "and"] discharged [Passive voice] because they are seen unfit to serve the country. Gay rights is a big topic in the United States right now ["Now" is a difficult word. Because this is being read some time after you wrote it, "now" is ambiguous. If you mean "as of the present time" (Since the revolution, George is now king), you can simply leave out "now" = Since the revolution, George is king. If the time or date is important, fill it in] and is the main focus of [The preposition should be "on"] this expository essay. The LGBT community deserves the same rights that everyone else is entitled [Passive voice] to. [Avoid using "at" or "to" at the end of sentence; this is informal grammar] According to research, in 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed a law on any gay man or gay woman that, [Check word usage--If this word refers to a human being, people are never "that" or "which," they are "who"] if broken, would [Remove comma] mean the men would be castrated [Passive voice] and the women 's nose cartilage would be mutilated [Passive voice] (Head, 2010). The U.S. Supreme Court finally put a stop to laws like these after enforcing them for 224 years (Head, 2010). In 1951 the first national gay rights organization was founded, [Passive voice] but because of the times it was too dangerous and not to mention illegal so they had to meet in code (Head, 2010). In 1969 the gay rights movement really [Clearer writing suggestion--"real" or "really" means "existing in actuality"--it adds little to the meaning (and using it to mean "big," "very," or "genuine" is slang); replace it with a more expressive word] accelerated, after raiding a gay bar in Greenwich Village and arresting employees and drag performers the NYPD got more than they bargained for, [Remove comma after a conjunction as first word in a sentence unless it precedes a parenthetical phrase] a crowd of more than 2,000 gay, lesbian, and transgender supporters of the bar took on the police and forced them into the bar which [Use "that" for a restrictive phrase (or place a comma before "which")] caused a three-day long riot. [A sentence as long as this (50 or more words) can be confusing because it can have logic twists, recursions, or long lists. Cut it into shorter sentences, each with a single idea. Shorter sentences are easier to comprehend] Since then there have been several presidents and businesses that have "come out" as supporters of gay rights. There were ["There were" is an awkward phrase if "there" is not clearly a location] states that started to let gays get married and [Check punctuation--place comma before "and" if what follows is an independent clause (could be a sentence by itself)--See eCampus > Library > Center for Writing Excellence > Grammar Guides > Mechanics > Run-ons] some that started to then took it away such as California recently. One would think that of all the rights that should automatically be given [Passive voice] to the LGBT, the right to openly serve [split infinitive] in the military would be at the top. However, that isn 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] the case. Many men and women have been discharged [Passive voice] from the military for simply being proud of who they are. Some of whom served in the military for years, risking their lives to keep America safe. America 's history has had several different [Redundancy: if you have "several," surely they are "different." Remove "different"] policies when it comes to [Clearer writing suggestion--Since "it" is undefined, "when it comes to" often can be reduced to simply "concerning" ] homosexuals in the military. Before World War II there were no written policies against homosexuals serving in the military, except that sodomy was thought as a crime by military law ever since the Revolutionary War times (Powers,2010 [Leave a space after the comma] ). However, during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, homosexuality was defined [Passive voice] as a mental defect and all homosexuals were barred [Passive voice] from serving based on medical problems (Powers, 2010). In 1982 the Department of Defense actually [Cliché: "actual" and "actually" are weak words whose meaning is nothing more than "in point of fact." They are often used as intensifiers but usually can be deleted with no change in meaning ] came out saying that "homosexuality was incompatible with military service," in a DOD directive causing nearly 17,000 men and women to be discharged [Passive voice] during the 1980s (Powers, 2010). By the end of this decade, several homosexuals of the military publically came out and challenged their discharges through the legal system and by the beginning of 1993 it appeared that the military 's ban on homosexual personnel would soon be overturned [Passive voice] (Powers,2010 [Leave a space after the comma] ). After a long debate and congressional hearings President Clinton and Senator Sam Nunn reached a compromise which [Use "that" for a restrictive phrase (or place a comma before "which")] they called "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell, Don 't Pursue", [A period or comma goes inside the closing quotation mark] under its terms those serving in the military will not be asked about their sexual orientation and would not be discharged [Passive voice] simply for being homosexual. However, having [Clearer writing suggestion--"having" as a transitive verb is vague. Reconsider the sentence using "possessing," "acquiring," "developing," etc. Often "having" can simply be deleted] sexual relations, or displaying any sort of attraction to the same sex, or telling any other military personnel about their sexual orientation is considered "homosexual conduct" under the policy and is a basis for involuntary discharge (Powers, 2010). As of right now "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell" remains in effect, and will [Remove comma before "and" (if the following is not a complete clause or the last element in a series)] continue to for awhile [This word is considered a solecism (something awkward, incorrect, or out of place)--use "a while"] it seems. President Obama is taking a different stance on the issue and instead of facing the problem head-on is putting it aside for a later date (Powers,2010 [Leave a space after the comma] ). I have faith that one day, maybe not in my generation or lifetime, but someday the LGBT community will be given [Passive voice] the rights that they are entitled [Passive voice] to as "free" Americans. Although this essay is focused [Passive voice] mainly on the fight for gay rights in the United States alone, people need to understand that the LGBT is fighting for their rights all over the world. In Spain, where the kings and queens were once the biggest defenders of the Christian religion, the socialist government has launched a reform that will grant gays and lesbians the right to legal get married and adopt (Graff, 2004). Even though Europe has a long tradition of protecting gay rights, Denmark was actually [see above] the first to introduce registered partnerships between homosexual couples in 1989 (Graff, 2004). The Dutch finally legalized same-sex marriage in 2001 (Graff, 2004). So why can 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] the United States? [Unless in a quote or a title, avoid rhetorical questions in academic writing] Why are we [Use "we," "us," or "our" to mean yourself and coauthors, not general humanity (or yourself and the reader)] so far behind in the times? The United States, however, is surprisingly not the worst country when it comes to [concerning] legalizing gay rights. Spain is actually [see above] where the fight is fiercest, even though the government will allow homosexual couples to marry and adopt children, the Church has called on Spanish Catholics to help fight the legislation (Graff, 2004). Which [Check the sentence--beginning with "Which," if it is not a question, it is probably a sentence fragment] isn 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] anywhere near as bad as Italy, where the Italian parliament has passed one of the harshest assisted-fertility laws in Europe that bans donor sperm, donor eggs, and surrogate motherhood, all of which homosexual couples can take advantage of to have children, and limits assisted-fertility treatments to "stable" heterosexual couples (Graff, 2004). [Sentence too long] In the United States, same-sex couples couldn 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] wed anywhere in the country until 2004. But [In academic writing, avoid starting a sentence with a conjunction ] now, same-sex marriage is legal in six states: Vermont, Iowa, Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire (Vestal,2009 [Leave a space after the comma] ). Currently, the United States is divided [Passive voice] on whether or not to redefine marriage. The California Supreme Court approved the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage but in turn allowed the 18,000 homosexual couples that had married before Proposition 8 [Write out numbers under 10] took effect to continue to legally be [split infinitive] married [Passive voice] (Vestal, 2009). On top of this, twenty-nine [Express numbers higher than nine in digits (if not the first word in the sentence)] other states have voter-approved prohibitions that block same-sex marriage in their state 's constitution [If this refers to the United States Constitution, capitalize it, whether or not it is preceded by "the U.S."] to try and [correct usage is "try to"] keep the judges from overturning the bans on same-sex marriage. In polls, a very large amount of Americans are still against equal marriage rights for the LGBT, but these margins are getting smaller (Vestal,2009 [Leave a space after the comma] ). If gays continue to be denied [Passive voice] these rights they miss out on benefits that heterosexual couples are automatically entitled to. [Avoid using "at" or "to" at the end of sentence; this is informal grammar] The National Organization for Women (2003) stated, "Same-sex couples across the country are denied more than 1,000 federal protections and rights. Most states deny committed lesbian and gay couples hundreds of additional benefits. These rights range from the ability to file joint tax returns to the crucial responsibility of making decisions on a partner 's behalf in a medical emergency." In conclusion, some people do think that being homosexual is a perversion or a way for their teen or family member to rebel against their [his or her] parents. This is just not true, loving someone, whether of the same sex or not, is not something that can be controlled [Passive voice] or stopped. Heterosexual couples love without reason, why can 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] same-sex couples? People cannot help who they are attracted to, so why should they be punished [Passive voice] for it? What can be done about this? Getting the word out that acceptance is as simple as keeping religion out of the topic altogether. Some people 's opinions are based [Passive voice] on what they think is written the Bible and use passages from the Bible to back up their case. However, religion is supposed [Passive voice] to be kept out of the courtroom so why is this topic an exception to that rule? If a person has a homosexual man or woman that [Check word usage--If this word refers to a human being, people are never "that" or "which," they are "who"] has recently come out in their [his or her] family, they [he or she] should support them, help them [Check pronoun agreement--if "them" refers to "person" (or a singular subject), it should be singular, too (him or her)] through this difficult time don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] condemn them. In the long run [Cliché--"In the long run" is an old phrase, seen too often, and marks your writing as unoriginal. Try to express the idea in another way] it will do more damage to that person if they [Place comma before this word if this is the end of the introductory phrase (beginning with "In")] [he or she] don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] have someone to support them [him or her] or someone to trust through a change this big.
References: Powers, R.(2010). An Overview of the Don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] Ask Don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] Tell Policy. Don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] Ask Don 't [Contractions are inappropriate in academic writing--write it out] Tell-The Military Policy on Gays. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com/od/millegislation/a/dontask.htm Graff, J.(2004). The Fight Over Gay Rights. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,733764,00.html Head,T.(2010). The American Gay Rights Movement. Retrieved from: [Because the preceding words indicate that a series or "answer" follows, remove colon] http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gendersexuality/tp/History-Gay-Rights-Movement.htm Vestal,C.(2009). Gay Marriage Legal in Six States. Retrieved from http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=347390
* preferences * Help
Turnitin Originality Report * Processed on: 11-07-10 8:25 PM CST * ID: 157528569 * Word Count: 1542 * Submitted: 1
Final Draft 2 By Curtis Little Similarity Index
23%
What 's this?
Similarity by Source
Internet Sources:
23%
Publications:
7%
Student Papers:
N/A
exclude quoted exclude bibliography exclude small matches download print mode: 9% match (Internet from 5/4/10) http://usmilitary.about.com/od/millegislation/a/dontask.htm 5% match (Internet from 2/28/06) http://gemission.org/news/Docs/Ambassador_72.pdf 3% match (Internet from 5/7/10) http://now.org/nnt/fall-2003/marriage.html 1% match (Internet from 1/4/10) http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,733764-2,00.html 1% match (Internet from 10/24/10) http://www.connexion.org/gay-news/news?id=474519 1% match (Internet from 3/27/10) http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/cache/documents/1285/128521.pdf 1% match (Internet from 2/11/10) http://spiderbites.about.com/civilliberty.htm 1% match (Internet from 10/18/09) http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton 1% match (Internet from 11/6/10) http://www.nyclu.org/publications/marriage-recognition-qa-lesbian-and-gay-couples 1% match (Internet from 5/15/09) http://www.ipspr.sc.edu/publication/Transportation%20Infrastructure.pdf < 1% match (Internet from 3/14/10) http://www.helium.com/debates/207614/side_by_side Curtis Little COM/150 Effective Essay Writing Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay November 7th, 2010 Kathryn Geranios Gay Rights Expository Essay Even though some people believe that being homosexual is a choice made by an individual either as a way to rebel or as a perversion, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community (LGBT) deserve the same rights that heterosexuals are entitled to. Rights such as the right to be married in more than just a few states and the right to openly serve in the military without the fear of being discharged. Lately there have been several news stories that involve the LGBT in some way, the biggest being the teens that committed suicide because of bullying in school or over the Internet. It is stories like these that make a person wonder if there will ever be a day that the LGBT are accepted or at least be left alone to live their own lives as they are. So many people are being discharged from the military because the word got out that they are homosexual, including officers that have been in the military for years. This should not be allowed to go on. These men have literally been risking their lives for years for no reason but pride in their country and they are discharged because they are seen unfit to serve the country. Gay rights is a big topic in the United States right now and is the main focus of this expository essay. The LGBT community deserves the same rights that everyone else is entitled to. According to research, in 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed a law on any gay man or gay woman that, if broken, would mean the men would be castrated and the women 's nose cartilage would be mutilated (Head, 2010). The U.S. Supreme Court finally put a stop to laws like these after enforcing them for 224 years (Head, 2010). In 1951 the first national gay rights organization was founded, but because of the times it was too dangerous and not to mention illegal so they had to meet in code (Head, 2010). In 1969 the gay rights movement really accelerated, after raiding a gay bar in Greenwich Village and arresting employees and drag performers the NYPD got more than they bargained for, a crowd of more than 2,000 gay, lesbian, and transgender supporters of the bar took on the police and forced them into the bar which caused a three-day long riot. Since then there have been several presidents and businesses that have "come out" as supporters of gay rights. There were states that started to let gays get married and some that started to then took it away such as California recently. One would think that of all the rights that should automatically be given to the LGBT, the right to openly serve in the military would be at the top. However, that isn 't the case. Many men and women have been discharged from the military for simply being proud of who they are. Some of whom served in the military for years, risking their lives to keep America safe. America 's history has had several different policies when it comes to homosexuals in the military. Before World War II there were no written policies against homosexuals serving in the military, except that sodomy was thought as a crime by military law ever since the Revolutionary War times (Powers,2010). However, during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, homosexuality was defined as a mental defect and all homosexuals were barred from serving based on medical problems (Powers, 2010). In 1982 the Department of Defense actually came out saying that "homosexuality was incompatible with military service," in a DOD directive causing nearly 17,000 men and women to be discharged during the 1980s (Powers, 2010). By the end of this decade, several homosexuals of the military publically came out and challenged their discharges through the legal system and by the beginning of 1993 it appeared that the military 's ban on homosexual personnel would soon be overturned (Powers,2010). After a long debate and congressional hearings President Clinton and Senator Sam Nunnreached a compromise which they called "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell, Don 't Pursue", under its terms those serving in the military will not be asked about their sexual orientation and would not be discharged simply for being homosexual. However, having sexual relations, or displaying any sort of attraction to the same sex, or telling any other military personnel about their sexual orientation is considered "homosexual conduct" under the policy and is a basis for involuntary discharge (Powers, 2010). As of right now "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell" remains in effect, and will continue to for awhile it seems. President Obama is taking a different stance on the issue and instead of facing the problem head-on is putting it aside for a later date (Powers,2010). I have faith that one day, maybe not in my generation or lifetime, but someday the LGBT community will be given the rights that they are entitled to as "free" Americans. Although this essay is focused mainly on the fight for gay rights in the United States alone, people need to understand that the LGBT is fighting for their rights all over the world. In Spain, where the kings and queens were once the biggest defenders of the Christian religion, the socialist government has launched a reform that will grant gays and lesbians the right to legal get married and adopt (Graff, 2004). Even though Europe has a long tradition of protecting gay rights, Denmark was actually the first to introduce registered partnerships between homosexual couples in 1989 (Graff, 2004). The Dutch finally legalized same-sex marriage in 2001 (Graff, 2004). So why can 't the United States? Why are we so far behind in the times? The United States, however, is surprisingly not the worst country when it comes to legalizing gay rights. Spain is actually where the fight is fiercest, even though the government will allow homosexual couples to marry and adopt children, the Church has called on Spanish Catholics to help fight the legislation (Graff, 2004). Which isn 't anywhere near as bad as Italy, where the Italian parliament has passed one of the harshest assisted-fertility laws in Europe that bans donor sperm, donor eggs, and surrogate motherhood, all of which homosexual couples can take advantage of to have children, and limits assisted-fertility treatments to "stable" heterosexual couples (Graff, 2004). In the United States, same-sex couples couldn 't wed anywhere in the country until 2004. But now, same-sex marriage is legal in six states: Vermont, Iowa, Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire (Vestal,2009). Currently, the United States is divided on whether or not to redefine marriage. The California Supreme Court approved the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage but in turn allowed the 18,000 homosexual couples that had married before Proposition 8 took effect to continue to legally be married (Vestal, 2009). On top of this, twenty-nine other states have voter-approved prohibitions that block same-sex marriage in their state 's constitution to try and keep the judges from overturning the bans on same-sex marriage. In polls, a very large amount of Americans are still against equal marriage rights for the LGBT, but these margins are getting smaller (Vestal,2009). If gays continue to be denied these rights they miss out on benefits that heterosexual couples are automatically entitled to. The National Organization for Women (2003) stated, "Same-sex couples across the country are denied more than 1,000 federal protections and rights. Most states deny committed lesbian and gay couples hundreds of additional benefits. These rights range from the ability to file joint tax returns to the crucial responsibility of making decisions on a partner 's behalf in a medical emergency." In conclusion, some people do think that being homosexual is a perversion or a way for their teen or family member to rebel against their parents. This is just not true, loving someone, whether of the same sex or not, is not something that can be controlled or stopped. Heterosexual couples love without reason, why can 't same-sex couples? People cannot help who they are attracted to, so why should they be punished for it? What can be done about this? Getting the word out that acceptance is as simple as keeping religion out of the topic altogether. Some people 's opinions are based on what they think is written the Bible and use passages from the Bible to back up their case. However, religion is supposed to be kept out of the courtroom so why is this topic an exception to that rule? If a person has a homosexual man or woman that has recently come out in their family, they should support them, help them through this difficult time don 't condemn them. In the long run it will do more damage to that person if they don 't have someone to support them or someone to trust through a change this big. References: Powers, R.(2010). An Overview of the Don 't Ask Don 't Tell Policy. Don 't Ask Don 't Tell- The Military Policy on Gays. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com/od/millegislation/a/dontask.htm Graff, J.(2004). The Fight Over Gay Rights. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171, 733764 ,00.html Head ,T.( 2010). The American Gay Rights Movement. Retrieved from: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gendersexuality/tp/History- Gay-Rights-Movement .htm Vestal,C.(2009). Gay Marriage Legal in Six States. Retrieved from http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId= 347390 Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 1 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 2 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 3 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 4 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 5 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 6 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 7 Curtis Little
References: Powers, R.(2010). An Overview of the Don 't Ask Don 't Tell Policy. Don 't Ask Don 't Tell- The Military Policy on Gays. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com/od/millegislation/a/dontask.htm Graff, J.(2004). The Fight Over Gay Rights. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171, 733764 ,00.html Head ,T.( 2010). The American Gay Rights Movement. Retrieved from: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gendersexuality/tp/History- Gay-Rights-Movement .htm Vestal,C.(2009). Gay Marriage Legal in Six States. Retrieved from http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId= 347390 Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 1 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 2 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 3 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 4 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 5 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 6 Curtis Little Week 9 Day 7 Final Expository Essay 7 Curtis Little
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I am writing this letter to you to inform you about work related stress and to make suggestions to you on how to handle this problem. Being the head of the Oncology department I am sure that you would like your department to run as smooth as possible. Having a policy in place to deal with stress at work that should focus on six areas such as demands, control, support, relationships, role and change.…
- 514 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It was on December 21, 1993, that “Don’t ask, don’t tell” became the official United States policy on homosexuals who wanted to serve in the United States Military. This was just another step toward the direction of “change” that Clinton had promised the American people and accomplished.…
- 2016 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Something is better than nothing; this was evidently ex-President Clinton’s attitude when he drafted the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell policy”, commonly known as DADT. DADT allowed gays to serve in the military as long as they were not open about their sexual orientations. This policy proved to be a quick fix that solely masked an inherently discriminatory law. Gays were still not allowed to serve openly. President Clinton ideally hoped for gays to be able to freely serve in the military. However, this proved to be too liberal for the conservatives sitting in the White House in the 1990s. Under pressure, Clinton scrambles for a solution and in his press conference titled “Gays in the Military”, he unveils the DADT. It was critical for Clinton to persuade the public and elude that although the DADT is neither what he envisioned nor what he promised millions of Americans; it was a step in the right direction. This critique examines precisely that. It examines how Clinton uses, logos, pathos and ethos during his ceremonial announcement of the DADT, to convince the public that the DADT was for the better good of Americans.…
- 1617 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Equality for soldiers of different sexual orientations has come slowly. In 1993 President Clinton enacted a policy which is known as “Don’t ask, don’t tell”. This rule allowed soldiers who did not openly discuss their homosexuality to legally serve in the military. Before that just being discovered as being gay was enough to get you an immediate dishonorable discharge. Some people were very worried that gay soldiers would pursue unwanted romantic relationships with their straight fellow soldiers and cause lots of discomfort in the barracks and in combat situations. Others worried that gay soldiers would be targets of harassment by straight soldiers. Both of these worries turned out to be unfounded and in 2010 soldiers of all sexual orientations…
- 155 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
During the 1940s through 1960s, many LGBT struggle through their lifestyle, they were eventually seen as threat to the American security,Homosexuality was not condoned in the military, that homosexual soldiers were dishonorably discharged.However small group began stepping forward by expanding the cultural knowledge of the gay world, exposing people who may have never known of its existence.…
- 80 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to understand the pressures homosexual students in ROTC experienced prior and post repeal of the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy that banned gay men and women from serving in the military. Specifically focusing on how it affected these students academic experience and the dynamics of the relationships they had with their fellow cadets. By expressing my personal experience as a gay cadet in army ROTC at the University of Kansas I hope to provide an alternative point of view from those that have already been studied. As my research is different from others in this way, I can come closer to the truth of my research question. The military has a history of asserting discriminatory policies like DADT that segregate and deprive minorities. How do these policies affect the academic and social prosperity of the students facing this issue? In the following research proposal I will examine peer reviewed articles and books that support my claims and arguments. I will then describe the method and strategy in which I will carry out the research. And finally, I will specify my intended audiences and the goals of my research.…
- 1112 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The homosexual community raised up for their right when AIDS was pointed to them as their fault. Many people stood up for what they believed in for the rights of all humans. The discrimination toward the homosexuals was not only in america, but around the world. At least 76 countries in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean “have anti-homosexual laws”(Picard). Not only did this give the community right, but those with diseases and with disabilities…
- 1991 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…
- 1566 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The article “When evidence is a crime” by Elizabeth Goitein is a case study about a Federal court decision to uphold the “don’t ask, don’t tell policy (DADT)” and violation of The First and Fifth Amendments. The court decision in “Holmes vs. California Army Nation Guard took place in 1997, which was fairly recent after the decision by former President Clinton who implemented the “Don’t ask Don’t Tell policy”. The case study argues that the continuing to ignore the rights of Homosexuals in the courts will result in a trend of continued dismissal of Homosexual rights in the Armed Forces; specifically the First Amendment. This case was published in the Yale Law Journal in 1998 which Goitein analyses one specific case’s violation of Homosexual rights by providing evidence from other similar cases of Homosexual conduct and criminal cases. The Yale Law Journal is the most widely cited and one of the oldest law reviews in the nation. The Journal’s mission is to disseminate legal scholarship to the world.…
- 1838 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
First off homosexuals in the military have been a nationwide issue since the crusades, and as for the U.S. military, it’s been unconstitutional since George Washington commanded the army in 1778. And in 1916 the U.S military explicitly prohibited homosexuality in the Articles of War of 1916, even though the ban wasn’t heavily enforced until WW 2. During this era millions of men conscripted for the war effort were rejected for being gay. In 1992 governor Bill Clinton promised to lift the ban on gays in the military if elected president, thus entered the “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy. Although this was a bit of an upgrade from before Congress still passed a law to keep opening gay men and women from serving in the military. Therefore gays were allowed to serve as long as they didn’t tell about their sexual orientation. And although the Pentagon agreed to stop asking about sexuality in recruitment forms and interviews (apart of the Military Personnel Eligibility Act of 1993), it never agreed to stop investigating whether those serving in the military were gay. Hence, since 1994 more than 12000 service members have been dismissed because of homosexuality.…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
While it is true that the institution of the military is largely based on fraternal bonding that should not be cleaved by social factionalism, the call of the modern changing times have rendered the U.S. military ready for the open—not un-manifested—gay presence.…
- 1229 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This essay will be a slightly different assignment from our others. There will not be a class workshop. While this is still a formal writing assignment, I’m kind of sneaking in one extra essay this semester to give us something “fun” to do amidst our other writing projects.…
- 345 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Defying some laws of physics, and the laws of sequels, “Fast Five” is the fourth sequel to 2001’s “The Fast and the Furious” that’s worth watching and isn’t an embarrassment to the original picture. “Fast Five” promises us more exhilarating action sequences, fast vintage muscle cars, lots of cold cash and let’s not forget some hot compliant cuties.…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Thesis Statement: The Gay Rights Movement dates back to the 19th century. By 1970 gay and lesbian organizations existed all over the United States and in other countries all over the world. Some supporters of the movement would say that our society as a whole has made great strides towards acceptance of homosexuality. However, gays and lesbians are still fighting for equality in 2009. The issues are vast and widespread, with same-sex marriage at the top of the list. In the world that we live in today one might be surprised to learn how many countries are accepting of gay and lesbians, as well as how many are not. The world has made progress within the last decade regarding this issue, but definitely not enough. We need to take steps to protect and balance Gay rights.…
- 3319 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
A hot topic in the news these days is whether gays should be allowed to serve openly in the military. Many issues have arisen from allowing or not allowing gays to serve openly. Those opposed are concerned that gays would cause a break down in unit cohesion, a rise in assaults or violence, a drop in recruitment or retention, and feel that since America is currently fighting two wars that right now is not a good time to implement a new policy when it is felt that the current one is working just fine. Numerous studies have been conducted on this issue. Through poll, surveys, observing other countries that allow gays to serve openly and even by checking history it is felt that this would not be the case. Given all the evidence that points to allowing gays to serve openly outweigh any negatives that would possibly come about. Gays make up a portion of key personnel that is sorely needed in this time of war especially with a all volunteer force. The fact that military personal are being lost due to this law not only is harmful to military it also wrong on that these gays are having their basic human rights violated by the very country they are trying to protect.…
- 2957 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays