The problem with this issue, like many social and political issues, as noted earlier, is there are at least two opinions, with half the people trying to turn a matter into law, and the other half trying to stop it. For example, in Florida in 2011 the legislation to put drug testing in place when applying for welfare went into action. However, that order was very short lived. One reason was that the state of Florida was not able to prove, using research data, that there was a drug abuse problem in that state in general. The order was taken to court by the opposition and a three judge panel in charge of the case wrote “The State has presented no evidence, that simply because an applicant for TANF benefits is having financial problems, he is also drug addicted or prone to fraudulent neglectful behavior." (Delany2). The American Civil Liberties Union sued the state of Florida to stop the law using the Constitution 's ruling against search without reason, to show that the law goes against the principles of the constitution. Using those principles to make the point that if there is no connection between drugs and the welfare recipient prior to applying to welfare then it is unconstitutional to drug test the applicant. …show more content…
The people arguing for drug tests for welfare recipients use the argument that if the government is going to help those who meet the requirements for welfare, and give them the tax payers money, then the tax payers should have a say on how that money is spent. After the state of Florida was sued for approving drug tests for welfare recipients in legislation, Florida Governor Rick Scott called the ruling "disturbing" and said the state would take it up with the U.S. Supreme Court. (Delany 1). Governor Scott also stating "Welfare is taxpayer money to help people looking for jobs who have children, illegal drug use by anyone with children looking for a job is totally destructive. This is fundamentally about protecting the wellbeing of Florida families. We will protect children and families in our state, and this decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court." (Delany 1). Many believe as well that drug testing for welfare recipients will actually be a deterrent for illegal drug use by those families who are counting on their welfare checks, giving them a better chance of getting off welfare in the long run and making a better life because of the absence of illegal drug